HornetJail wrote:JDR720 wrote:We traded for Nurk because we thought we traded Mark. So unless we also plan on trading Mark again, I don't think we'll keep Nurk. He's too expensive to be a backup.
i don't even think it's that. we traded for Nurk because there was a 1st round pick attached and we gave up raw sewage to get it. I'd be quite surprised to see Nurk on the team at all next year
I'd be surprised to NOT see him on the team next year since he has a guaranteed $19m contract nobody seems to want. How could we move off of him without waiving/stretching? Maybe by the deadline he can be moved as an expiring for something of value but it might be hard to do that in the off-season when teams still have hopes and dreams and health.






















