ImageImage

LaMelephant: The LaMelo Ball Thread (#2)

Moderators: BigSlam, yosemiteben, fatlever, JDR720, Diop

Rich4114
RealGM
Posts: 11,352
And1: 4,688
Joined: Mar 11, 2004
Location: PA
   

Re: LaMelephant: The LaMelo Ball Thread (#2) 

Post#1041 » by Rich4114 » Fri Mar 14, 2025 6:02 pm

HornetJail wrote:
JDR720 wrote:We traded for Nurk because we thought we traded Mark. So unless we also plan on trading Mark again, I don't think we'll keep Nurk. He's too expensive to be a backup.

i don't even think it's that. we traded for Nurk because there was a 1st round pick attached and we gave up raw sewage to get it. I'd be quite surprised to see Nurk on the team at all next year


I'd be surprised to NOT see him on the team next year since he has a guaranteed $19m contract nobody seems to want. How could we move off of him without waiving/stretching? Maybe by the deadline he can be moved as an expiring for something of value but it might be hard to do that in the off-season when teams still have hopes and dreams and health.
User avatar
fatlever
Senior Mod - Hornets
Senior Mod - Hornets
Posts: 59,457
And1: 16,005
Joined: Jun 04, 2001
Location: Terrapin Station
     

Re: LaMelephant: The LaMelo Ball Thread (#2) 

Post#1042 » by fatlever » Thu Mar 20, 2025 8:05 pm

Read on Twitter


Very fair point here by plow But he also discussed in his recent podcast. Sometimes life gets in the way of basketball. And there's no doubt that his father going through all this had an impact on his energy and focus over the past few months.
User avatar
fatlever
Senior Mod - Hornets
Senior Mod - Hornets
Posts: 59,457
And1: 16,005
Joined: Jun 04, 2001
Location: Terrapin Station
     

Re: LaMelephant: The LaMelo Ball Thread (#2) 

Post#1043 » by fatlever » Thu Mar 20, 2025 8:08 pm

Read on Twitter


Top/Bottom 4 guards in FG% within 5 feet of the basket this season (min 100 FGA):

76.4 — Gary Payton II
72.1 — Tyrese Haliburton
72.0 — Josh Hart
70.4 — Shai Gilgeous-Alexander

50.5 — Talen Horton-Tucker
50.0 — LaMelo Ball
50.0 — Keon Johnson
47.6 — Fred VanVleet
User avatar
HornetJail
RealGM
Posts: 46,638
And1: 14,316
Joined: Feb 05, 2012
     

Re: LaMelephant: The LaMelo Ball Thread (#2) 

Post#1044 » by HornetJail » Thu Mar 20, 2025 8:16 pm

fatlever wrote:
Read on Twitter


Top/Bottom 4 guards in FG% within 5 feet of the basket this season (min 100 FGA):

76.4 — Gary Payton II
72.1 — Tyrese Haliburton
72.0 — Josh Hart
70.4 — Shai Gilgeous-Alexander

50.5 — Talen Horton-Tucker
50.0 — LaMelo Ball
50.0 — Keon Johnson
47.6 — Fred VanVleet

I'd be curious to know where that was 15 games into the season when LaMelo was actually at full strength. because he definitely hasn't looked anywhere near himself since then, and it showed first in his ability to get to the basket
investigate Adam Silver
User avatar
yosemiteben
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 22,478
And1: 15,677
Joined: Mar 20, 2013
   

Re: LaMelephant: The LaMelo Ball Thread (#2) 

Post#1045 » by yosemiteben » Thu Mar 20, 2025 8:29 pm

HornetJail wrote:
fatlever wrote:
Read on Twitter


Top/Bottom 4 guards in FG% within 5 feet of the basket this season (min 100 FGA):

76.4 — Gary Payton II
72.1 — Tyrese Haliburton
72.0 — Josh Hart
70.4 — Shai Gilgeous-Alexander

50.5 — Talen Horton-Tucker
50.0 — LaMelo Ball
50.0 — Keon Johnson
47.6 — Fred VanVleet

I'd be curious to know where that was 15 games into the season when LaMelo was actually at full strength. because he definitely hasn't looked anywhere near himself since then, and it showed first in his ability to get to the basket

Scrolling through the stats by month is kinda nuts:

October = 44.4% on 4.5 attempts per game
November = 55.4% on 6.6 attempts per game
December = 66.7% on 3.0 attempts per game
January = 55.6% on 4.0 attempts per game
February = 28.6% on 1.6 attempts per game
March = 31.4% on 4.4 attempts per game

Stats from the NBA stats site - https://www.nba.com/stats/players/shooting
User avatar
JMAC3
RealGM
Posts: 13,357
And1: 6,301
Joined: May 22, 2010
     

Re: LaMelephant: The LaMelo Ball Thread (#2) 

Post#1046 » by JMAC3 » Thu Mar 20, 2025 8:37 pm

yosemiteben wrote:
HornetJail wrote:
fatlever wrote:
Read on Twitter


Top/Bottom 4 guards in FG% within 5 feet of the basket this season (min 100 FGA):

76.4 — Gary Payton II
72.1 — Tyrese Haliburton
72.0 — Josh Hart
70.4 — Shai Gilgeous-Alexander

50.5 — Talen Horton-Tucker
50.0 — LaMelo Ball
50.0 — Keon Johnson
47.6 — Fred VanVleet

I'd be curious to know where that was 15 games into the season when LaMelo was actually at full strength. because he definitely hasn't looked anywhere near himself since then, and it showed first in his ability to get to the basket

Scrolling through the stats by month is kinda nuts:

October = 44.4% on 4.5 attempts per game
November = 55.4% on 6.6 attempts per game
December = 66.7% on 3.0 attempts per game
January = 55.6% on 4.0 attempts per game
February = 28.6% on 1.6 attempts per game
March = 31.4% on 4.4 attempts per game

Stats from the NBA stats site - https://www.nba.com/stats/players/shooting


I have pretty much quit trying to take any stat from this season mattering. When you have 3 Gleague players on the floor 60% of the time it is going to negatively affect everyone.

Tyrese Maxey efficiency is down.
Dejounte Murray efficiency is down.
Scottie Barnes efficiency is down.
DeAron Fox efficiency went down when he went to Spurs.

It is almost like having good players around you makes the game easier, having pathetic teammates around you makes the game way harder.
User avatar
HornetJail
RealGM
Posts: 46,638
And1: 14,316
Joined: Feb 05, 2012
     

Re: LaMelephant: The LaMelo Ball Thread (#2) 

Post#1047 » by HornetJail » Thu Mar 20, 2025 8:37 pm

yeah that tracks. lower percentage than i would've expected in October and November, but on the attempts alone, you can tell he hasn't been right these last couple months

(fair warning on the December stats... that's a 4 game sample size, so he made 8/12 shots)
investigate Adam Silver
User avatar
HornetJail
RealGM
Posts: 46,638
And1: 14,316
Joined: Feb 05, 2012
     

Re: LaMelephant: The LaMelo Ball Thread (#2) 

Post#1048 » by HornetJail » Thu Mar 20, 2025 8:39 pm

JMAC3 wrote:I have pretty much quit trying to take any stat from this season mattering. When you have 3 Gleague players on the floor 60% of the time it is going to negatively affect everyone.

Tyrese Maxey efficiency is down.
Dejounte Murray efficiency is down.
Scottie Barnes efficiency is down.
DeAron Fox efficiency went down when he went to Spurs.

It is almost like having good players around you makes the game easier, having pathetic teammates around you makes the game way harder.

same but the problem is we've had THREE CONSECUTIVE seasons of this ****. I can't believe two different front offices have managed to put pure toxic waste around Melo, for more than half his career.
investigate Adam Silver
User avatar
JMAC3
RealGM
Posts: 13,357
And1: 6,301
Joined: May 22, 2010
     

Re: LaMelephant: The LaMelo Ball Thread (#2) 

Post#1049 » by JMAC3 » Thu Mar 20, 2025 8:50 pm

HornetJail wrote:
JMAC3 wrote:I have pretty much quit trying to take any stat from this season mattering. When you have 3 Gleague players on the floor 60% of the time it is going to negatively affect everyone.

Tyrese Maxey efficiency is down.
Dejounte Murray efficiency is down.
Scottie Barnes efficiency is down.
DeAron Fox efficiency went down when he went to Spurs.

It is almost like having good players around you makes the game easier, having pathetic teammates around you makes the game way harder.

same but the problem is we've had THREE CONSECUTIVE seasons of this ****. I can't believe two different front offices have managed to put pure toxic waste around Melo, for more than half his career.


I mean I can, the current front office traded away half our rotation players for future draft picks. The most obvious outcome in that scenario would be worse, then double down on that with our good players never being healthy.

I still stand by that adding two guys in the Rui Hachimura, Colin Sexton talent level range and this team probably puts up a Bulls type of season even with the injuries. In that alternate universe maybe we don't end up bottom 3 and we actually are trying to win games instead of outright tanking and resting guys.
User avatar
fatlever
Senior Mod - Hornets
Senior Mod - Hornets
Posts: 59,457
And1: 16,005
Joined: Jun 04, 2001
Location: Terrapin Station
     

Re: LaMelephant: The LaMelo Ball Thread (#2) 

Post#1050 » by fatlever » Thu Mar 20, 2025 9:05 pm

Which rotation players are you referring to?
rozier = has been awful for heat
hayward = retired, and we got mann
pj = traded for grant, curry = wash if not for injury = bad luck, not reduction of talent
nick = essentially for moose/nurk - Yes I realize it was a separate trade
cody = hurt = plus we got okogie = equal talent, but again, bad luck
micic = has played 1 min for suns
cap space = green
cap space = jefferies

So if not for injuries that core of players we traded would be out of rotation for including the following players in the rotation:
mann, grant, okogie, curry, nurkic, moose, green, jefferies

It's the injuries that destroyed the depth on this roster, not the trading away of our old rotation players for draft picks and equally talented players. Green has been a massive disappointment, but other than that the rest is injuries.
User avatar
fatlever
Senior Mod - Hornets
Senior Mod - Hornets
Posts: 59,457
And1: 16,005
Joined: Jun 04, 2001
Location: Terrapin Station
     

Re: LaMelephant: The LaMelo Ball Thread (#2) 

Post#1051 » by fatlever » Thu Mar 20, 2025 9:12 pm

on paper
melo / mann / kj
green / nsj / curry
miller / okogie / jefferies
miles / grant / salaun
mark / nurk / moose

vs

melo / kj
rozier / nsj
miller / cody
miles / pj / salaun
mark / nick / moose

I'd rather have the roster on the top. Not to mention the numerous picks that came with it.
User avatar
JDR720
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 44,321
And1: 45,968
Joined: Jul 09, 2013
     

Re: LaMelephant: The LaMelo Ball Thread (#2) 

Post#1052 » by JDR720 » Thu Mar 20, 2025 9:22 pm

The main trades (PJ and Rozier and Hayward) technically happened with Mitch in charge. So this new front office has yet to really do much of anything in regards to team building.

The Mark trade was their first big attempt.
User avatar
yosemiteben
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 22,478
And1: 15,677
Joined: Mar 20, 2013
   

Re: LaMelephant: The LaMelo Ball Thread (#2) 

Post#1053 » by yosemiteben » Thu Mar 20, 2025 9:24 pm

JDR720 wrote:The main trades (PJ and Rozier and Hayward) technically happened with Mitch in charge. So this new front office has yet to really do much of anything in regards to team building.

The Mark trade was their first big attempt.

They made three trades that would have yielded 3 1sts and an unprotected swap while returning rotation worthy players and churning the back end of the roster. Not exactly sitting around doing nothing.
User avatar
fatlever
Senior Mod - Hornets
Senior Mod - Hornets
Posts: 59,457
And1: 16,005
Joined: Jun 04, 2001
Location: Terrapin Station
     

Re: LaMelephant: The LaMelo Ball Thread (#2) 

Post#1054 » by fatlever » Thu Mar 20, 2025 9:41 pm

JDR720 wrote:The main trades (PJ and Rozier and Hayward) technically happened with Mitch in charge. So this new front office has yet to really do much of anything in regards to team building.

The Mark trade was their first big attempt.


Mitch was technically general manager during those trades. But Mitch was under directions from the new owners and they brought in some outside consultants to facilitate some of those trades. So I'm not really sure how involved Mitch was in those trades. I think all of that was pushed from the new owners.
User avatar
yosemiteben
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 22,478
And1: 15,677
Joined: Mar 20, 2013
   

Re: LaMelephant: The LaMelo Ball Thread (#2) 

Post#1055 » by yosemiteben » Thu Mar 20, 2025 9:43 pm

Feels like the FO should get some pretty significant credit for finding Diabate and then locking him down for uber cheap.
User avatar
SWedd523
RealGM
Posts: 13,595
And1: 6,544
Joined: Jul 07, 2009
   

Re: LaMelephant: The LaMelo Ball Thread (#2) 

Post#1056 » by SWedd523 » Thu Mar 20, 2025 11:18 pm

when finding Moussa Diabate deserves "significant" credit then you must have "significantly" low standards
Image
User avatar
yosemiteben
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 22,478
And1: 15,677
Joined: Mar 20, 2013
   

Re: LaMelephant: The LaMelo Ball Thread (#2) 

Post#1057 » by yosemiteben » Thu Mar 20, 2025 11:24 pm

SWedd523 wrote:when finding Moussa Diabate deserves "significant" credit then you must have "significantly" low standards

We found a viable backup center and signed him to a 3 year deal for barely above league minimum.

That's just objectively good work.

But sure let's workshop "significant" so we make sure we're not being too positive.
User avatar
SWedd523
RealGM
Posts: 13,595
And1: 6,544
Joined: Jul 07, 2009
   

Re: LaMelephant: The LaMelo Ball Thread (#2) 

Post#1058 » by SWedd523 » Thu Mar 20, 2025 11:26 pm

could've easily said "deserves credit"

I wasn't the one who added the operative term
Image
User avatar
JDR720
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 44,321
And1: 45,968
Joined: Jul 09, 2013
     

Re: LaMelephant: The LaMelo Ball Thread (#2) 

Post#1059 » by JDR720 » Thu Mar 20, 2025 11:30 pm

fatlever wrote:
JDR720 wrote:The main trades (PJ and Rozier and Hayward) technically happened with Mitch in charge. So this new front office has yet to really do much of anything in regards to team building.

The Mark trade was their first big attempt.


Mitch was technically general manager during those trades. But Mitch was under directions from the new owners and they brought in some outside consultants to facilitate some of those trades. So I'm not really sure how involved Mitch was in those trades. I think all of that was pushed from the new owners.

The new owners may've wanted the trades and the consultants may've helped find them, but Mitch still had to put them together. So my point still stands, this new FO hasn't really done anything of significance.

Their big move would've been trading Mark, but the Lakers pulled out and we got a pie in our faces.

Finding Diabate was nice... but he's a backup PF/C and ideally the useful 3rd stringer (and he is this unless we trade Mark again or Nurk). This can't be your big achievement if you want to be a serious team.
User avatar
yosemiteben
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 22,478
And1: 15,677
Joined: Mar 20, 2013
   

Re: LaMelephant: The LaMelo Ball Thread (#2) 

Post#1060 » by yosemiteben » Thu Mar 20, 2025 11:32 pm

SWedd523 wrote:could've easily said "deserves credit"

I wasn't the one who added the operative term

Yes, you just parachuted into the discussion to criticize me for being too complimentary of the FO.

Glad to have the adjective police on the case!

Return to Charlotte Hornets