knicks94 wrote:If Thibs had to choose between Kolek and Mitch to play the PG he would choose the latter.
Wrong. PJ would get the nod.
Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23
knicks94 wrote:If Thibs had to choose between Kolek and Mitch to play the PG he would choose the latter.
Wildcat wrote:knicks94 wrote:If Thibs had to choose between Kolek and Mitch to play the PG he would choose the latter.
Wrong. PJ would get the nod.
Fat wrote:College ball or this
god shammgod wrote:
is our roster better than the celtics ? answer the question
Luv those Knicks wrote:god shammgod wrote:
is our roster better than the celtics ? answer the question
Healthy and 5 on 5 . . . we might be close. The problem is, they have a bench. We have Mitch and McBride.
Maury2423 wrote:We win tonight and everybody forgets how unprepared we are for the playoffs
robillionaire wrote:Towns basically got horse collar tackled and no call f this league
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:Guano wrote:MrDollarBills wrote:
The criticisms of Tom are valid though, I dunno why people are pretending that he's doing a great job when he is consistently outclassed by opposing coaches who aren't stuck in 2004.
Cause some believe changing coaches is like throwing new paint on a house with bad bones.
Also thibs is the coach who lead us out of the mud. Credit due or not.
Guan0, as your psychotic running mate would say, be better.
We all know this comes down to, we're not kids. People unhappy with the roster want to absolve Tom of any blame, because it hurts their point to say the coach isn't maximizing the roster. You can shove data, clips, minutes, history etc into the discussion and it all gets tossed out the window. The previous argument was that minutes didn't matter until Mikal blew the whistle and we've seen that one quiet down. It's why you see wild strawmans, like saying we need a new coach means you think the roster as is could win a title this year, no but I don't want to retool the team and go into next season with the same brain-dead coach that plays 8 guys every single season.
The biggest hole in the "keep Thibs" argument is the losing record against .500 or better teams since he's been here, multiple rosters, with the only constant being him, and the same problems persisting - Short rotations, no offensive scheme, not enough threes, INJURIES AROUND PLAYOFF time. Who gives a damn who gets you out the mud, they aren't retiring JB Bickerstaff's track suit in Cleveland.
Never forget the "minutes don't matter" arguments from the very same people. Thank you again Mikal
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
god shammgod wrote:they shouldn't hold a draft. a bunch of experts should get together and determine who should get the 1st pick based on a lack of talent. and nobody deserves it more than this franchise. it's not even close. lol
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
god shammgod wrote:they shouldn't hold a draft. a bunch of experts should get together and determine who should get the 1st pick based on a lack of talent. and nobody deserves it more than this franchise. it's not even close. lol
god shammgod wrote:Luv those Knicks wrote:god shammgod wrote:
is our roster better than the celtics ? answer the question
Healthy and 5 on 5 . . . we might be close. The problem is, they have a bench. We have Mitch and McBride.
no
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
robillionaire wrote:god shammgod wrote:they shouldn't hold a draft. a bunch of experts should get together and determine who should get the 1st pick based on a lack of talent. and nobody deserves it more than this franchise. it's not even close. lol
Nobody ever gave us anything. F those bums
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.