dougthonus wrote:sco wrote:I think there was a handshake deal with Zach at the start of the season that he'd play nice and keep his mouth shut and we'd take our best offer for him at the deadline. Both sides did their part.
Agreed.I think our goal may have been to tank post trade, but it has become obvious to me anyway that this team wasn't underperforming because Zach was bad, it was because Pat, Terry and Vuc are really horrible, and if you replace their minutes with capable rotation-level players you more than make up for any drop-off in losing Zach. Also, clearly Zach created some sort of psychological barrier for Coby and Josh being more aggressive, which wasn't on Zach, but it was a problem.
I think it is highly suspicious that we're playing well/better at all.
We're 7-11 (32 win pace) since the trade, the wins are all against teams that threw out tanking worthy rosters except perhaps the Magic.
Philadeliphia - absolute free fall
Raptors - actively tanking and required 4point play at the buzzer to force OT
Magic - below .500 but at least trying
Miami - absolute free fall since Butler trade
Pacers - Haliburton sat this game out
Nets - Tanking
Jazz - Tanking
IMO, the return of Pat and Vuc as well as Ball being out (and Giddey) has made it tough to evaluate this group.