1. Archetype we needDriguez wrote:Weltman a going for Poole? Right
2. Michigan ties
3. Possible chemistry with our players
Moderators: Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior, UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird

1. Archetype we needDriguez wrote:Weltman a going for Poole? Right
eyriq wrote:VFX wrote:Get it?
Bad roster construction and a "broken system", OR a young team hit with injuries to their best players that is still developing.
You are investing so much energy and angst into a critique of a rebuilding team that hasn't even started their playoff contention phase of the build. Talk to me in 2027 when Paolo is in the first year of his max deal.
VFX wrote:
No, you are just willfully dense.
Suggs as a SG played spectacularly well. The issue with this team is solved with a competent point guard, which he would have shown at this point as being capable.
VFX wrote:Wrong. That’s your quote two posts ago. Regardless of what was “intended” doesn’t matter. Your initial gripe was saying you “didn’t like” the narrative that Paolo wanted a point guard and gave me a Weltman rationale as to why.
VFX wrote:So you are either playing dumb or buy into this idea that Weltmans intentions outweigh the outcomes. I don’t care about the intentions whether that emotionally matters to you or not.
VFX wrote:I haven’t brought up any of your previous posts in this exchange. You make it seem like you’ve earned some level of respect discussing things here with me. You haven’t. It’s not personal. Your takes vary from Front Office apologist to player contrarian. Can’t say I respect either of those opinions whether it comes from you or not. You let nothing go if someone calls you out. Saying stupid crap like “reading comprehension” in responses doesn’t help your case. It makes your arguments look weak, so I WILL be talking down to you when you respond that way.
VFX wrote:What is it that you don’t understand?
Are you saying that the roster, that you agree needs an overhaul, isn’t a contribution to poor performances even if injured at various stages? The point guard experiment failed but that has nothing to do with the way the system is run? OK bud.
VFX wrote:You say they need a system then think it’s “ridiculous” not having one isn’t a factor. OK.
VFX wrote:You have a hard time differentiating what Weltman says and what the rest of the league says. I understand that from someone that buys everything the FO tells them.
VFX wrote:Windhorst said “nobody hears from Orlando about trades” point blank. Weltman hasn’t made a trade since March 2021. Then WELTMAN SAYS “teams wanted to squeeze us for assets because of our current position”. A position he created himself despite probably lying anyway. We have his track record on trades. It doesn’t matter what he claims. Was Mike Miller caught discussing the weather with him in a heated exchange?![]()
Get it?
The money is not ideal at all..... But at some point we're going to need to sacrifice some defense for offense.... Poole would be the most dynamic offensive guard we've had in quite a whileeyriq wrote:1. Archetype we needDriguez wrote:Weltman a going for Poole? Right
2. Michigan ties
3. Possible chemistry with our players

JF5 wrote:thelead wrote:shadrock wrote:Just basic competent PG play has taken this teams shooting up a level. Simply incomprehensible how it took this long to realise it.
Now imagine if we had a good PG... GM malpractice after Paolo publicly called for it after the playoff loss.
I never really liked this specific narrative... They signed Suggs to a big contract so they hoped he could develop into a PG to certain degree without having to sign one that would get in his way.
Also, they wanted Paolo and Franz to develop playmaking skills aswell. And look who was the beneficiary of not having a PG during that time. It was Franz who took a bigger leap than most here probably imagined.
You don't see this version of Franz with a healthy Paolo and a PG who has the ball in their hands a lot. This is why this season was a success to me. You got a definitive second guy or 1b. who can carry your offense when Paolo is struggling or hurt.
This is what we say about this year not being being about this year. This was a crucial developmental year that has essentially set this team up for the next 7-10 years. It was definitely a win.
JF5 wrote:VFX wrote:
No, you are just willfully dense.
Suggs as a SG played spectacularly well. The issue with this team is solved with a competent point guard, which he would have shown at this point as being capable.
You're only looking at this one way, lmao... So if they purposely put Suggs as the starting PG and have Anthony Black running the second unit as the main playmaker. What do you think the Front Office is trying to accomplish with those roster decisions?
Again, I don't care if it worked or not. There is a clear science and objectives that you're ignoring here as well.
”they wanted Paolo and Franz to develop playmaking skills aswell. And look who was the beneficiary of not having a PG during that time.”VFX wrote:Wrong. That’s your quote two posts ago. Regardless of what was “intended” doesn’t matter. Your initial gripe was saying you “didn’t like” the narrative that Paolo wanted a point guard and gave me a Weltman rationale as to why.
So you can't read, clearly... How do you correlate my quote here saying them having them improve their playmaking skills, to the Magic not needing a PG. Did you not pay attention to my preference of the Magic going after Quickley from the Raptors?
See, you find a quote where you essentially miss the context and attempt to say put that in my post. I have clearly said in multiple post that this team needs a Starting. But you somehow make up the fact that said this.you're absolutely unhinged
I've said this about your post in the past. You don't read thoroughly and just make up quotes or misread them when you get mad. It makes you look ridiculous.VFX wrote:So you are either playing dumb or buy into this idea that Weltmans intentions outweigh the outcomes. I don’t care about the intentions whether that emotionally matters to you or not.
I'm not playing dumb this is young team that is still going through a development process that you want to jump over like its NBA 2K... Also, you just want this team to built so quickly in your specific way that it's pissing you off to no end. You wanted Tyus Jones, and the Magic didn't get him. They didn't do it now you want them to fail or be fired. It's clear as day that's why you're so angry. Nevemind you this team drafted Paolo and Franz in back to back seasons. They're apparently a "terrible Front Office".VFX wrote:I haven’t brought up any of your previous posts in this exchange. You make it seem like you’ve earned some level of respect discussing things here with me. You haven’t. It’s not personal. Your takes vary from Front Office apologist to player contrarian. Can’t say I respect either of those opinions whether it comes from you or not. You let nothing go if someone calls you out. Saying stupid crap like “reading comprehension” in responses doesn’t help your case. It makes your arguments look weak, so I WILL be talking down to you when you respond that way.
Buddy, the reason I'm talking that way is because you are literally misquoting me. I'm telling you one thing straight away and all of a sudden you're telling me this is what I truly meant.
At one point of this convo I'm saying Paolo and Franz need to improve their playmaking skills, AND I'm also saying they need an actual PG. You're telling me I never said that even though I said it in 2 reply post and even had my preference for Immanuel Quickley, which indicates I want an actual PG.
That is absolutely a reading comprehension issue if I'm having to clarify what I've said for the 4th time now.
VFX wrote:What is it that you don’t understand?
Are you saying that the roster, that you agree needs an overhaul, isn’t a contribution to poor performances even if injured at various stages? The point guard experiment failed but that has nothing to do with the way the system is run? OK bud.
Well, if the team stays healthy and the continuity, familiarity, and talent composition doesn't get compromised and isn't having to be shuffled every other game. I'm confident this team would've won 45+ games. But obviously should've, would've, could've doesn’t matter in this league.VFX wrote:You say they need a system then think it’s “ridiculous” not having one isn’t a factor. OK.
The master of misquoting and making up quotes! Find me the quote where I said this team "doesn't need a system". Should be a dozy...VFX wrote:You have a hard time differentiating what Weltman says and what the rest of the league says. I understand that from someone that buys everything the FO tells them.
This makes me chuckle... NBA LEAGUE SOURCES had stated the Magic were talking to multiple teams about trades during the most deadline.
You do realize this is independent of the Magic brass/Front Office, right? So independent sources are stating that Weltman is making calls to teams about PGs or certain talent. It's most likely happening
On top of that a quick Google search and also going back to our own Orlando Magic Deadline Trade thread fron a few months ago backs-up this claim too. This isn't fictitious at all.VFX wrote:Windhorst said “nobody hears from Orlando about trades” point blank. Weltman hasn’t made a trade since March 2021. Then WELTMAN SAYS “teams wanted to squeeze us for assets because of our current position”. A position he created himself despite probably lying anyway. We have his track record on trades. It doesn’t matter what he claims. Was Mike Miller caught discussing the weather with him in a heated exchange?![]()
Get it?
This is just more of an editorial at this point rather than facts. If you're frustrated about how the Magic are building the team or just sit on their hands that's fine.
But I'm not going to go for the straight up lie that they weren't trying to trade for a PG during the deadline when there are literally quotes from our own trade deadline thread, independent league sources, and Weltman saying himself that he did call multiple teams but didn't like the deals.
That amount of cognitive dissonance is not it.


pepe1991 wrote:Slight problem with "two point forwards" hypothesis.
Orlando Magic 22,8 APG. ( 30th)
League's average -26-ish APG
Since all star break, things are even worst- 21,8 apg ( dead last)
Highest usage players in nba.
Franz - 4,7 APG
Banchero 4,8 APG
Giannis 6,5 APG
Lamelo 7,2 APG
SGA- 6,3 APG
Luka 8,5 APG
Cade - 9,2 APG
Ja Morant -7,4 APG
Tatum 5,9 APG
Mitchell 4,8 APG
Edwards 4,6 APG
Victor - 3,9 APG.
As you can see, among 12 highest usage players, our "point forwards" are right there with Edwards & Mitchell ( both play with actual PGs) among lowest APG high usage players in nba.
Mitchell has Garland (6,7 APG); Edwards has Conley ( 4,6 APG in 25 mpg), Victor is damn C.
So can see, whole "point forward" thing is complete and utter BS. They are uber-usage mediocre passers/play makers at best who don't make offense better. They just average some mandatory APG due sheer fact they end every third possession on the floor. And due fact "ending possession" also includes passing to shot, majority of that happens between them.
Things go form ugly to flat out sad when you see shot tendencies from usage. Paolo and SGA with similar usage (0,9 in favor of SGA) are within same %FGA taken with usage. 35%.
Problem? Paolo averages 25 ppg on 19,5 FGA & 54,8% TS.
SGA averages 33 ppg on 21,5 FGA and 64,6% TS.
Basically, for just 2 FGA more, on similar usage, due efficiency, SGA gets 8 points more on 9,8% higher efficiency.
Their current level of offense, in way they play offense is waaaaaaaaaay more similar to Lavine & Derozan than fans want to admit.
Like, we give Franz pass for what? 32% usage rate on 55,8% TS. Just because he plays good defense doesn't mean his offense works.
His eFG% is 3,5% below league's average. That's not acceptable.
We will go nowhere with them playing like this. Most of us wanted to get ACTUAL PLAY MAKER to make ACTUAL EVALUATION of them as players when they work within structure of normal team. Instead we got half of a decade of Marklelle Fultz![]()
And now Weltman will be playing darts in dark, taking team over first apron , to second apron, just to hope one PG can actually make Franz- Paolo duo work.
In single winning season with them, team won because of bench and defense. Not really because of them. Often despite Banchero.
But Weltman did this to ourself, but he will get fired eventually and go home with $10M . I understand him. I don't understand fans who want to defend this nonsense. Post all star break, we are top 10 worst nba team.
Trillen wrote:pepe1991 wrote:Slight problem with "two point forwards" hypothesis.
Orlando Magic 22,8 APG. ( 30th)
League's average -26-ish APG
Since all star break, things are even worst- 21,8 apg ( dead last)
Highest usage players in nba.
Franz - 4,7 APG
Banchero 4,8 APG
Giannis 6,5 APG
Lamelo 7,2 APG
SGA- 6,3 APG
Luka 8,5 APG
Cade - 9,2 APG
Ja Morant -7,4 APG
Tatum 5,9 APG
Mitchell 4,8 APG
Edwards 4,6 APG
Victor - 3,9 APG.
As you can see, among 12 highest usage players, our "point forwards" are right there with Edwards & Mitchell ( both play with actual PGs) among lowest APG high usage players in nba.
Mitchell has Garland (6,7 APG); Edwards has Conley ( 4,6 APG in 25 mpg), Victor is damn C.
So can see, whole "point forward" thing is complete and utter BS. They are uber-usage mediocre passers/play makers at best who don't make offense better. They just average some mandatory APG due sheer fact they end every third possession on the floor. And due fact "ending possession" also includes passing to shot, majority of that happens between them.
Things go form ugly to flat out sad when you see shot tendencies from usage. Paolo and SGA with similar usage (0,9 in favor of SGA) are within same %FGA taken with usage. 35%.
Problem? Paolo averages 25 ppg on 19,5 FGA & 54,8% TS.
SGA averages 33 ppg on 21,5 FGA and 64,6% TS.
Basically, for just 2 FGA more, on similar usage, due efficiency, SGA gets 8 points more on 9,8% higher efficiency.
Their current level of offense, in way they play offense is waaaaaaaaaay more similar to Lavine & Derozan than fans want to admit.
Like, we give Franz pass for what? 32% usage rate on 55,8% TS. Just because he plays good defense doesn't mean his offense works.
His eFG% is 3,5% below league's average. That's not acceptable.
We will go nowhere with them playing like this. Most of us wanted to get ACTUAL PLAY MAKER to make ACTUAL EVALUATION of them as players when they work within structure of normal team. Instead we got half of a decade of Marklelle Fultz![]()
And now Weltman will be playing darts in dark, taking team over first apron , to second apron, just to hope one PG can actually make Franz- Paolo duo work.
In single winning season with them, team won because of bench and defense. Not really because of them. Often despite Banchero.
But Weltman did this to ourself, but he will get fired eventually and go home with $10M . I understand him. I don't understand fans who want to defend this nonsense. Post all star break, we are top 10 worst nba team.
Not that I wouldn't be willing to believe the proposal you're making, but I'd love to see a bit more breakdown of some stats like potential assists among these high usage players and, especially, the rate of conversion on those potential assists among high usage players.
I don't have any analytics, so I'm definitely a casual in this argument but my mind jumps to:
A. We probably clang the hell out a lot of potential assists
or
B. Our point forwards shoot more and pass less because we probably clang the hell out a lot of potential assists
KillMonger wrote:The money is not ideal at all..... But at some point we're going to need to sacrifice some defense for offense.... Poole would be the most dynamic offensive guard we've had in quite a whileeyriq wrote:1. Archetype we needDriguez wrote:Weltman a going for Poole? Right
2. Michigan ties
3. Possible chemistry with our players
Sent from my [Sidekick 5G] using RealGM mobile app
cedric76 wrote:JF5 wrote:thelead wrote:
Now imagine if we had a good PG... GM malpractice after Paolo publicly called for it after the playoff loss.
I never really liked this specific narrative... They signed Suggs to a big contract so they hoped he could develop into a PG to certain degree without having to sign one that would get in his way.
Also, they wanted Paolo and Franz to develop playmaking skills aswell. And look who was the beneficiary of not having a PG during that time. It was Franz who took a bigger leap than most here probably imagined.
You don't see this version of Franz with a healthy Paolo and a PG who has the ball in their hands a lot. This is why this season was a success to me. You got a definitive second guy or 1b. who can carry your offense when Paolo is struggling or hurt.
This is what we say about this year not being being about this year. This was a crucial developmental year that has essentially set this team up for the next 7-10 years. It was definitely a win.
And 1, fans r too shortsighted and impatient (and dumb)

AB exists. Your evaluation record is forever blemished.Skybox wrote:KillMonger wrote:The money is not ideal at all..... But at some point we're going to need to sacrifice some defense for offense.... Poole would be the most dynamic offensive guard we've had in quite a whileeyriq wrote:1. Archetype we need
2. Michigan ties
3. Possible chemistry with our players
Sent from my [Sidekick 5G] using RealGM mobile app
And, most importantly, my desire to trade for him 3 years ago, before he went bonkers his first year in WAS, will be hailed as great wisdom and I will once again have a flawless player analysis track record
I can remove my scarlet letter “P”

JoshuaPotter wrote:I notice when we win game threads typically die in terms of how many posts. Just an FYI, I do not login here during the weekend and some days. I am not avoiding a rant ect ect.
Glad the guys won. CoJo is doing what I suspected. Turning this team into a .500+ team. Sad, because we don't need a great PG as much as we need an avg maybe even bellow avg one.
pepe1991 wrote:Slight problem with "two point forwards" hypothesis.
Orlando Magic 22,8 APG. ( 30th)
League's average -26-ish APG
Since all star break, things are even worst- 21,8 apg ( dead last)
Highest usage players in nba.
Franz - 4,7 APG
Banchero 4,8 APG
Giannis 6,5 APG
Lamelo 7,2 APG
SGA- 6,3 APG
Luka 8,5 APG
Cade - 9,2 APG
Ja Morant -7,4 APG
Tatum 5,9 APG
Mitchell 4,8 APG
Edwards 4,6 APG
Victor - 3,9 APG.
As you can see, among 12 highest usage players, our "point forwards" are right there with Edwards & Mitchell ( both play with actual PGs) among lowest APG high usage players in nba.
Mitchell has Garland (6,7 APG); Edwards has Conley ( 4,6 APG in 25 mpg), Victor is damn C.
So can see, whole "point forward" thing is complete and utter BS. They are uber-usage mediocre passers/play makers at best who don't make offense better. They just average some mandatory APG due sheer fact they end every third possession on the floor. And due fact "ending possession" also includes passing to shot, majority of that happens between them.
Things go form ugly to flat out sad when you see shot tendencies from usage. Paolo and SGA with similar usage (0,9 in favor of SGA) are within same %FGA taken with usage. 35%.
Problem? Paolo averages 25 ppg on 19,5 FGA & 54,8% TS.
SGA averages 33 ppg on 21,5 FGA and 64,6% TS.
Basically, for just 2 FGA more, on similar usage, due efficiency, SGA gets 8 points more on 9,8% higher efficiency.
Their current level of offense, in way they play offense is waaaaaaaaaay more similar to Lavine & Derozan than fans want to admit.
Like, we give Franz pass for what? 32% usage rate on 55,8% TS. Just because he plays good defense doesn't mean his offense works.
His eFG% is 3,5% below league's average. That's not acceptable.
We will go nowhere with them playing like this. Most of us wanted to get ACTUAL PLAY MAKER to make ACTUAL EVALUATION of them as players when they work within structure of normal team. Instead we got half of a decade of Marklelle Fultz![]()
And now Weltman will be playing darts in dark, taking team over first apron , to second apron, just to hope one PG can actually make Franz- Paolo duo work.
In single winning season with them, team won because of bench and defense. Not really because of them. Often despite Banchero.
But Weltman did this to ourself, but he will get fired eventually and go home with $10M . I understand him. I don't understand fans who want to defend this nonsense. Post all star break, we are top 10 worst nba team.
Skybox wrote:If you think the above is an acceptable explanation for not doing his job…![]()
“I DID make calls but wasn’t able to get a deal done for any of the half dozen, clearly available, suitable combo guard options out there - because the other GMs were hard on me”
That doesn’t impress me very much as a resume builder for Weltman. Why would any GM EVER NOT try to “squeeze you” or vice versa? He’s too determined to not fail or look bad…I think his inaction looks even worse and his leverage will certainly not have improved after several more months of the offense looking even worse with less injured guys out and his young stars pointing out how even Cory Joseph is an improvement. Every day brings more evidence of his poor roster composition and makes the other GMs even “meaner”. I bet Pat Riley snickered at Weltman’s whiny TD story.
JF5 wrote:Skybox wrote:If you think the above is an acceptable explanation for not doing his job…![]()
“I DID make calls but wasn’t able to get a deal done for any of the half dozen, clearly available, suitable combo guard options out there - because the other GMs were hard on me”
That doesn’t impress me very much as a resume builder for Weltman. Why would any GM EVER NOT try to “squeeze you” or vice versa? He’s too determined to not fail or look bad…I think his inaction looks even worse and his leverage will certainly not have improved after several more months of the offense looking even worse with less injured guys out and his young stars pointing out how even Cory Joseph is an improvement. Every day brings more evidence of his poor roster composition and makes the other GMs even “meaner”. I bet Pat Riley snickered at Weltman’s whiny TD story.
I can agree this is very possible. But there were calls that were rumors connecting this team to specifically Anfernee Simons and Coby White during the Trade Deadline.
Maybe teams were asking for a Combo of Black/Carter and this year's first round pick which to me is too much to give. We aren't in those rooms/phone calls to know.
Deals do have to be made in the offseason. They have to be more aggressive.
JoshuaPotter wrote:I notice when we win game threads typically die in terms of how many posts. Just an FYI, I do not login here during the weekend and some days. I am not avoiding a rant ect ect.