"These next few weeks," one NBA executive said, "could be the worst tanking stretch we've ever seen."
https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/44378503/can-nba-fix-tanking-why-worse-season-plus-5-solutions
Moderators: fatlever, JDR720, Diop, BigSlam, yosemiteben
"These next few weeks," one NBA executive said, "could be the worst tanking stretch we've ever seen."
Snidely FC wrote:"These next few weeks," one NBA executive said, "could be the worst tanking stretch we've ever seen."
https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/44378503/can-nba-fix-tanking-why-worse-season-plus-5-solutions
yosemiteben wrote:Here's my tanking proposal - before the season starts, teams can elect to count all their games for the season as losses. If any teams do that, they are grouped together and given equal lotto odds, and they are exclusive so no one else can get in the top X (where X is the number of teams that elect to count all their games as losses before the season starts).
My thought process in that is that it will disincentivize tanking teams from trying to be bad because they can just elect to get all losses at the beginning of the season and thus during the season they can truly try to develop and build their team without worrying about being too good. It also would serve to help message expectations to fans.
This will also disincentivize teams who get injuries or just have randomly bad starts from completely mailing it in, because they'll be boxed out of the top picks unless no other team elected to tank before the season
I actually don't see a down side to this approach. Curious to hear thoughts on it.
Diop wrote:yosemiteben wrote:Here's my tanking proposal - before the season starts, teams can elect to count all their games for the season as losses. If any teams do that, they are grouped together and given equal lotto odds, and they are exclusive so no one else can get in the top X (where X is the number of teams that elect to count all their games as losses before the season starts).
My thought process in that is that it will disincentivize tanking teams from trying to be bad because they can just elect to get all losses at the beginning of the season and thus during the season they can truly try to develop and build their team without worrying about being too good. It also would serve to help message expectations to fans.
This will also disincentivize teams who get injuries or just have randomly bad starts from completely mailing it in, because they'll be boxed out of the top picks unless no other team elected to tank before the season
I actually don't see a down side to this approach. Curious to hear thoughts on it.
thats interesting, so you can start the season forfeiting the possibility of making the playoffs but you automatically go into the lottery at a certain %. So the win loss is meaningless for the year apart that its more fun to watch your team win.
I don't hate it.
fatlever wrote:kai jones
- has he figured it out
- meaningless march games, he's still a one trick pony
- hornets were correct in moving on given his bizarre behavior
- hornets gave up too soon
JMAC3 wrote:fatlever wrote:kai jones
- has he figured it out
- meaningless march games, he's still a one trick pony
- hornets were correct in moving on given his bizarre behavior
- hornets gave up too soon
Same Kai Jones as ever.
JMAC3 wrote:fatlever wrote:kai jones
- has he figured it out
- meaningless march games, he's still a one trick pony
- hornets were correct in moving on given his bizarre behavior
- hornets gave up too soon
Same Kai Jones as ever.
KembaWalker wrote:funny how a consistently good overachieving coach gets fired from a WC playoff team and people here are happy with Mr Rogers togetherness and youtube guru catch phrases
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
yosemiteben wrote:KembaWalker wrote:funny how a consistently good overachieving coach gets fired from a WC playoff team and people here are happy with Mr Rogers togetherness and youtube guru catch phrases
Yeah it would almost take actually trying to understand what's going on to understand it.