ImageImage

LaMelephant: The LaMelo Ball Thread (#2)

Moderators: BigSlam, yosemiteben, fatlever, JDR720, Diop

User avatar
SWedd523
RealGM
Posts: 13,594
And1: 6,543
Joined: Jul 07, 2009
   

Re: LaMelephant: The LaMelo Ball Thread (#2) 

Post#1061 » by SWedd523 » Fri Mar 21, 2025 12:15 am

yosemiteben wrote:
SWedd523 wrote:could've easily said "deserves credit"

I wasn't the one who added the operative term

Yes, you just parachuted into the discussion to criticize me for being too complimentary of the FO.

Glad to have the adjective police on the case!

Certainly doubt I'm the only one who would question the notion of finding Diabetes to be worthy of significant credit.

In fact, JDR just made a similar statement.

So perhaps I'm not looking for an excuse to criticize you, but instead using a forum for it's intended purpose. perhaps getting defensive over it isn't needed. I dunno.

Point stands. Good FOs aren't judged by finding a cheap second/third string Center..... unless you have incredibly low standards...... which was my point.
Image
KembaWalker
RealGM
Posts: 11,955
And1: 13,582
Joined: Dec 22, 2011

Re: LaMelephant: The LaMelo Ball Thread (#2) 

Post#1062 » by KembaWalker » Fri Mar 21, 2025 12:38 am

Imagine trying to pitch the vision to LaMelo for **** year 6 of his career in the exit interview based on your big Moussa Diabate acquisition lmao.
EmpireFalls
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,320
And1: 8,678
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
   

Re: LaMelephant: The LaMelo Ball Thread (#2) 

Post#1063 » by EmpireFalls » Fri Mar 21, 2025 1:18 am

LaMelo is absolutely a star player when locked in and playing with physicality like tonight.
User avatar
yosemiteben
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 22,476
And1: 15,675
Joined: Mar 20, 2013
   

Re: LaMelephant: The LaMelo Ball Thread (#2) 

Post#1064 » by yosemiteben » Fri Mar 21, 2025 2:32 pm

KembaWalker wrote:Imagine trying to pitch the vision to LaMelo for **** year 6 of his career in the exit interview based on your big Moussa Diabate acquisition lmao.

Yeah, you should really go get whoever said that was what they should do.
User avatar
HornetJail
RealGM
Posts: 46,636
And1: 14,314
Joined: Feb 05, 2012
     

Re: LaMelephant: The LaMelo Ball Thread (#2) 

Post#1065 » by HornetJail » Fri Mar 21, 2025 2:34 pm

yosemiteben wrote:
KembaWalker wrote:Imagine trying to pitch the vision to LaMelo for **** year 6 of his career in the exit interview based on your big Moussa Diabate acquisition lmao.

Yeah, you should really go get whoever said that was what they should do.

that's where we'd be at if the Mark trade went through (and if Peterson tries to trade Mark in the offseason for even less than the first time)
investigate Adam Silver
KembaWalker
RealGM
Posts: 11,955
And1: 13,582
Joined: Dec 22, 2011

Re: LaMelephant: The LaMelo Ball Thread (#2) 

Post#1066 » by KembaWalker » Fri Mar 21, 2025 3:05 pm

yosemiteben wrote:
KembaWalker wrote:Imagine trying to pitch the vision to LaMelo for **** year 6 of his career in the exit interview based on your big Moussa Diabate acquisition lmao.

Yeah, you should really go get whoever said that was what they should do.


to be fair thats only a small piece of the pitch. the other half of the poster generated pitch from what i remember was "well youre always hurt so you have no right to be miserable playing here and the league backed checks cleared so what else do you want"

hard to imagine why nobody good ever wants to play here with pitches like these
User avatar
Liver_Pooty
RealGM
Posts: 41,043
And1: 17,086
Joined: Dec 29, 2008
Location: Asheville, NC
   

Re: LaMelephant: The LaMelo Ball Thread (#2) 

Post#1067 » by Liver_Pooty » Sat Mar 22, 2025 4:38 pm

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8248L9P/


I don’t know if tik tok links work on here. But Brian Windhorst laid into Lamelo pretty good here.
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
User avatar
SWedd523
RealGM
Posts: 13,594
And1: 6,543
Joined: Jul 07, 2009
   

Re: LaMelephant: The LaMelo Ball Thread (#2) 

Post#1068 » by SWedd523 » Sat Mar 22, 2025 4:59 pm

I'm over 30 so I don't go on tik tok and I don't listen to nor respect anything Brian Windhorst has to say.


However, Melo has played like ass for a while now and it deserves mention
Image
User avatar
yosemiteben
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 22,476
And1: 15,675
Joined: Mar 20, 2013
   

Re: LaMelephant: The LaMelo Ball Thread (#2) 

Post#1069 » by yosemiteben » Sat Mar 22, 2025 5:00 pm

We've never had a more proactive FO, and we've never had more clarity about our goals and our plans to get there. I don't think we need to pitch Melo on anything, but I also would bet he's very aware of what our plans are.
User avatar
HornetJail
RealGM
Posts: 46,636
And1: 14,314
Joined: Feb 05, 2012
     

Re: LaMelephant: The LaMelo Ball Thread (#2) 

Post#1070 » by HornetJail » Sat Mar 22, 2025 5:16 pm

SWedd523 wrote:I'm over 30 so I don't go on tik tok and I don't listen to nor respect anything Brian Windhorst has to say.


However, Melo has played like ass for a while now and it deserves mention

i honestly think Melo should've been shut down weeks ago
investigate Adam Silver
KembaWalker
RealGM
Posts: 11,955
And1: 13,582
Joined: Dec 22, 2011

Re: LaMelephant: The LaMelo Ball Thread (#2) 

Post#1071 » by KembaWalker » Sat Mar 22, 2025 6:08 pm

yosemiteben wrote:We've never had a more proactive FO, and we've never had more clarity about our goals and our plans to get there. I don't think we need to pitch Melo on anything, but I also would bet he's very aware of what our plans are.


lolwut

half the board is still saying "wait till next year" while the team is actively trading away its best players for 2030 picks. if there is clarity to what their plan is, its definitely not clear to most people here
Braggins
RealGM
Posts: 14,636
And1: 9,376
Joined: Jan 05, 2014

Re: LaMelephant: The LaMelo Ball Thread (#2) 

Post#1072 » by Braggins » Sat Mar 22, 2025 6:38 pm

I thought I had a pretty clear idea of what their plan was... until they randomly tried to trade Mark Williams. Now I'm not so sure. I'm still leaning towards thinking the plan is similar to what I initially thought, but I don't have much confidence at all about it.
User avatar
yosemiteben
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 22,476
And1: 15,675
Joined: Mar 20, 2013
   

Re: LaMelephant: The LaMelo Ball Thread (#2) 

Post#1073 » by yosemiteben » Sat Mar 22, 2025 10:04 pm

KembaWalker wrote:
yosemiteben wrote:We've never had a more proactive FO, and we've never had more clarity about our goals and our plans to get there. I don't think we need to pitch Melo on anything, but I also would bet he's very aware of what our plans are.


lolwut

half the board is still saying "wait till next year" while the team is actively trading away its best players for 2030 picks. if there is clarity to what their plan is, its definitely not clear to most people here

I think it's because people don't want to pay attention to what the FO is saying or doing and are generally looking at things without actually trying to piece together a logical framework that the FO may be using. It's not like they're hiding what they're doing. Since new management came on, we've acquired 4 first round picks and like 8 second round picks.

It is kind of funny that a lot of national guys are complimentary of our FO and their willingness to be proactive and make moves with an eye towards the future, but a lot of folks on here are like "I don't know there's no logical connection between anything that has happened in the last 12 months, the FO has no plan and isn't doing anything."

And to be clear, I'm not saying anyone has to like the moves we made or the plan our FO is executing, but it's pretty obvious that there is one.
KembaWalker
RealGM
Posts: 11,955
And1: 13,582
Joined: Dec 22, 2011

Re: LaMelephant: The LaMelo Ball Thread (#2) 

Post#1074 » by KembaWalker » Tue Mar 25, 2025 2:51 pm

yosemiteben wrote:
KembaWalker wrote:
yosemiteben wrote:We've never had a more proactive FO, and we've never had more clarity about our goals and our plans to get there. I don't think we need to pitch Melo on anything, but I also would bet he's very aware of what our plans are.


lolwut

half the board is still saying "wait till next year" while the team is actively trading away its best players for 2030 picks. if there is clarity to what their plan is, its definitely not clear to most people here

I think it's because people don't want to pay attention to what the FO is saying or doing and are generally looking at things without actually trying to piece together a logical framework that the FO may be using. It's not like they're hiding what they're doing. Since new management came on, we've acquired 4 first round picks and like 8 second round picks.

It is kind of funny that a lot of national guys are complimentary of our FO and their willingness to be proactive and make moves with an eye towards the future, but a lot of folks on here are like "I don't know there's no logical connection between anything that has happened in the last 12 months, the FO has no plan and isn't doing anything."

And to be clear, I'm not saying anyone has to like the moves we made or the plan our FO is executing, but it's pretty obvious that there is one.


who are the national guys that have been complimentary of our FO anytime in say, 2025 or later?
I know Russillo said we are easily in the worst spot in the NBA in Feb, other than that I haven't seen much
https://www.si.com/nba/hornets/news/nba-insider-claims-charlotte-hornets-are-in-a-pretty-bad-spot

currently in our post mortem thread on the GB we are at 85% to replace the GM, of course nobody even knows who our GM is but I don't think anyone is really out there enamored with what this FO has done in year 1. i don't think too many people are impressed by flipping your previous regimes few good draft picks for future picks and mediocre/bad players and drafting scrubs. Thats not exactly progression
User avatar
yosemiteben
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 22,476
And1: 15,675
Joined: Mar 20, 2013
   

Re: LaMelephant: The LaMelo Ball Thread (#2) 

Post#1075 » by yosemiteben » Tue Mar 25, 2025 3:36 pm

KembaWalker wrote:
yosemiteben wrote:
KembaWalker wrote:
lolwut

half the board is still saying "wait till next year" while the team is actively trading away its best players for 2030 picks. if there is clarity to what their plan is, its definitely not clear to most people here

I think it's because people don't want to pay attention to what the FO is saying or doing and are generally looking at things without actually trying to piece together a logical framework that the FO may be using. It's not like they're hiding what they're doing. Since new management came on, we've acquired 4 first round picks and like 8 second round picks.

It is kind of funny that a lot of national guys are complimentary of our FO and their willingness to be proactive and make moves with an eye towards the future, but a lot of folks on here are like "I don't know there's no logical connection between anything that has happened in the last 12 months, the FO has no plan and isn't doing anything."

And to be clear, I'm not saying anyone has to like the moves we made or the plan our FO is executing, but it's pretty obvious that there is one.


who are the national guys that have been complimentary of our FO anytime in say, 2025 or later?
I know Russillo said we are easily in the worst spot in the NBA in Feb, other than that I haven't seen much
https://www.si.com/nba/hornets/news/nba-insider-claims-charlotte-hornets-are-in-a-pretty-bad-spot

Russillo and Simmons are haters, I tune them out when it comes to the Hornets.

ESPN guys like Marks, and other Ringer guys like the dudes on Group Chat have been singing a different tune. Bontemps wrote a piece late last week where he ranked us 2nd among what he considered to be 11 rebuild teams. His article is paywalled on ESPN+ but here's an SI article giving the gist of it: https://www.si.com/nba/hornets/news/nba-insider-thinks-charlotte-hornets-are-close-to-acing-the-rebuild
Chapelchilla
Starter
Posts: 2,009
And1: 1,434
Joined: Aug 04, 2014
         

Re: LaMelephant: The LaMelo Ball Thread (#2) 

Post#1076 » by Chapelchilla » Tue Mar 25, 2025 5:08 pm

The Williams trade was in line with the stated plan.
They want big guys who can shoot 3's and switch on D.
Post injury Mark is not that.
Maybe he can get back to the D part and work on a shot. Or- Maybe we change the offense and defense schemes up next season if we are gonna keep him after all and he is healthy. Hopefully both.
Being hurt last season and summer meant he never got to play while they were evaluating things. A good off season for him could change things up a lot.
JustBuzzin
RealGM
Posts: 16,349
And1: 13,815
Joined: Jun 10, 2023
 

Re: LaMelephant: The LaMelo Ball Thread (#2) 

Post#1077 » by JustBuzzin » Tue Mar 25, 2025 5:31 pm

NBA we will gift you Flagg, but in return you must trade LaMelo to a major market.

The NBA gets 2 storylines this off-season.
User avatar
JMAC3
RealGM
Posts: 13,357
And1: 6,301
Joined: May 22, 2010
     

Re: LaMelephant: The LaMelo Ball Thread (#2) 

Post#1078 » by JMAC3 » Tue Mar 25, 2025 6:23 pm

fatlever wrote:Which rotation players are you referring to?
rozier = has been awful for heat
hayward = retired, and we got mann
pj = traded for grant, curry = wash if not for injury = bad luck, not reduction of talent
nick = essentially for moose/nurk - Yes I realize it was a separate trade
cody = hurt = plus we got okogie = equal talent, but again, bad luck
micic = has played 1 min for suns
cap space = green
cap space = jefferies

So if not for injuries that core of players we traded would be out of rotation for including the following players in the rotation:
mann, grant, okogie, curry, nurkic, moose, green, jefferies

It's the injuries that destroyed the depth on this roster, not the trading away of our old rotation players for draft picks and equally talented players. Green has been a massive disappointment, but other than that the rest is injuries.


There is a difference between adding talent/removing talent and winning and losing a trade.

1. Rozier Trade. Yes, we won the trade with the pick. However, we got Kyle Lowry, who we bought out. Even with how terrible Terry has been in Miami, he is still better than 3000 minutes we have given Baugh, Simpson, Wong, Micic, Wong, Curry, Moore etc this year. We are clearly a more talented team and better overall with Terry on the roster getting minutes over that group.

2. PJ for Grant has not been a wash.
Off EPM/Def EPM/Overall
PJ 2025 58/78/67
PJ 2024 46/69/53
Grant 2025 52/9/33
Grant 2024 45/23/34

PJ has clearly been the better overall player during the time since the trade and that is before you factor in the health aspect of it.

I would argue we probably lost the Hayward trade if we are being honest. We paid 17 million this year for Mann, Bertans (dead) and Micic contracts and we got 2 2nds (Simpson + 2025 2nd). You can easily make the argument that having the 17 million in cap space would have been more valuable then anything that has come from this deal.

Again, I am fine with both of these outcomes from a trade standpoint, probably make the case that Charlotte won the trade. However, there is no argument we downgraded our talent on the roster from both of these trades and will likely remain the case until we use/trade those picks we acquired. We have not done anything to improve the talent outside of these trades either in any signicant move. We also attempted to do something similar with the Mark Williams trade that fell through, going from Mark to Dalton would again been a talent reduction in the short term and would made the roster worse.

So yeah, it is cool to have the future picks and mock up trades and live in the what if this happens or that happens scenario but those future picks are not helping us win games right now.
User avatar
yosemiteben
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 22,476
And1: 15,675
Joined: Mar 20, 2013
   

Re: LaMelephant: The LaMelo Ball Thread (#2) 

Post#1079 » by yosemiteben » Tue Mar 25, 2025 6:42 pm

JMAC3 wrote:Even with how terrible Terry has been in Miami, he is still better than 3000 minutes we have given Baugh, Simpson, Wong, Micic, Wong, Curry, Moore etc this year. We are clearly a more talented team and better overall with Terry on the roster getting minutes over that group.

Terry is on a bad contract, I'm thrilled to not be looking at paying him $27M next season. With his current production, we would have been better off salary dumping for nothing in return compared to keeping him.

JMAC3 wrote:I would argue we probably lost the Hayward trade if we are being honest. We paid 17 million this year for Mann, Bertans (dead) and Micic contracts and we got 2 2nds (Simpson + 2025 2nd). You can easily make the argument that having the 17 million in cap space would have been more valuable then anything that has come from this deal.

Not tracking how this is your take on Hayward but you don't think $27M in cap space would have been more valuable than Terry's production.

JMAC3 wrote:However, there is no argument we downgraded our talent on the roster from both of these trades and will likely remain the case until we use/trade those picks we acquired.

Well yeah, that's like the entire point of doing the trade in the first place - we obviously plan to use the picks.

JMAC3 wrote:So yeah, it is cool to have the future picks and mock up trades and live in the what if this happens or that happens scenario but those future picks are not helping us win games right now.

Right, we're consolidating assets and focusing on developing. A clear plan that was messaged by ownership and the FO before this season.
User avatar
JMAC3
RealGM
Posts: 13,357
And1: 6,301
Joined: May 22, 2010
     

Re: LaMelephant: The LaMelo Ball Thread (#2) 

Post#1080 » by JMAC3 » Tue Mar 25, 2025 6:52 pm

yosemiteben wrote:
JMAC3 wrote:Even with how terrible Terry has been in Miami, he is still better than 3000 minutes we have given Baugh, Simpson, Wong, Micic, Wong, Curry, Moore etc this year. We are clearly a more talented team and better overall with Terry on the roster getting minutes over that group.

Terry is on a bad contract, I'm thrilled to not be looking at paying him $27M next season. With his current production, we would have been better off salary dumping for nothing in return compared to keeping him.

JMAC3 wrote:I would argue we probably lost the Hayward trade if we are being honest. We paid 17 million this year for Mann, Bertans (dead) and Micic contracts and we got 2 2nds (Simpson + 2025 2nd). You can easily make the argument that having the 17 million in cap space would have been more valuable then anything that has come from this deal.

Not tracking how this is your take on Hayward but you don't think $27M in cap space would have been more valuable than Terry's production.

JMAC3 wrote:However, there is no argument we downgraded our talent on the roster from both of these trades and will likely remain the case until we use/trade those picks we acquired.

Well yeah, that's like the entire point of doing the trade in the first place - we obviously plan to use the picks.

JMAC3 wrote:So yeah, it is cool to have the future picks and mock up trades and live in the what if this happens or that happens scenario but those future picks are not helping us win games right now.

Right, we're consolidating assets and focusing on developing. A clear plan that was messaged by ownership and the FO before this season.


The argument wasn't if we won the trades. It was if the team got less talented.

We could trade LaMelo for 15 1sts in the 2029, 2030 and 2031 draft and we of course win the trade in the long run, but it is not up for debate that we would have downgraded the talent. That is my point. The front office has removed talent from the roster and therefore we should not be surprised we are worse/haven't improved.

Return to Charlotte Hornets