Jarrett Allen availability, value, offers
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Re: Jarrett Allen availability, value, offers
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,246
- And1: 7,514
- Joined: Sep 05, 2023
-
Re: Jarrett Allen availability, value, offers
In order for the Cavs to reach their full potential, what they really need is a backup big for Mobley/Allen. Other than that, I don’t think they should make any moves at all.
LakerLegend wrote:LeBron was literally more athletic at 35 than he was at 20
Re: Jarrett Allen availability, value, offers
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,707
- And1: 3,616
- Joined: Jul 31, 2009
Re: Jarrett Allen availability, value, offers
I would THINK about the Hartenstein & 1st idea, with the 1st I'd target being the BEST of 26 picks they have, with the view of drafting Dash Daniels. NO has the Indy and Bucks picks, neither of which will be high enough for Daniels, and Indy have NOTHING in 26, draft-wise. If OKC balked at the "best of", and tried to make it "2nd best of", absolutely NO deal. Daniels is the prize I want for this core...
Re: Jarrett Allen availability, value, offers
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,012
- And1: 12,821
- Joined: Jul 15, 2013
- Location: Ogden, UT
-
Re: Jarrett Allen availability, value, offers
Astaluego wrote:I think that even though he's a very good player,
I think if the Cavs want to maximize their team, they'll eventually have to use Mobley as their starting 5.
He's 26 years old (he turns 27 in a month). He has four more years on his contract (after this one), earning $20/$28/$30/$32 million.
He's averaging 13.5 ppg/10rb/2ast in 28.6 minutes.
What do you think it is worth? And what would you offer for it?
or not available
I would guess he is not available. He is a top 20 impact guy. Fundamentally great defensive big.
Good contract.
If he were to be traded I think he is worth a good prospect coming back and a couple firsts.
Jordan Walsh > Lonnie Walker
Re: Jarrett Allen availability, value, offers
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,789
- And1: 35,868
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Jarrett Allen availability, value, offers
The premise is flawed. Mobley is not now, and may never be, a full time center. I don't know that he has the constitution for it, and I don't see how him starting him against the biggest centers does anything other than exacerbate the problem.
Allen does fine against bigger centers so long as a second opponent isn't also pinning him. Approximately 90% of Cavs recent rebounding issues come off of long rebounds from missed 3s and perimeter players leaking out before we've ended the possession. There were improvements on that front last night, but there's still a couple of guys who need to be willing to sacrifice their fast break points.
Allen does fine against bigger centers so long as a second opponent isn't also pinning him. Approximately 90% of Cavs recent rebounding issues come off of long rebounds from missed 3s and perimeter players leaking out before we've ended the possession. There were improvements on that front last night, but there's still a couple of guys who need to be willing to sacrifice their fast break points.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Jarrett Allen availability, value, offers
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,336
- And1: 9,882
- Joined: Oct 27, 2016
Re: Jarrett Allen availability, value, offers
I think simply signing a guy like Mo Wagner would do wonders for them. They dont need to break up Mobley / Allen.
Re: Jarrett Allen availability, value, offers
-
- Forum Mod - Mavericks
- Posts: 19,368
- And1: 17,158
- Joined: Aug 20, 2020
Re: Jarrett Allen availability, value, offers
Gafford to ATL into TPE
Lively to the Cavs
JAFRO to the Mavs
Cavs get 2 years of cost controled rookie scale contract with highet upside, they also drop salary enough to signed their vet min FAs and use TPMLE, Mavs get a vet center with better health record and higher floor.
Lively to the Cavs
JAFRO to the Mavs
Cavs get 2 years of cost controled rookie scale contract with highet upside, they also drop salary enough to signed their vet min FAs and use TPMLE, Mavs get a vet center with better health record and higher floor.
Defense wins draft lotteries!
Re: Jarrett Allen availability, value, offers
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 92,371
- And1: 98,216
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: Jarrett Allen availability, value, offers
I want to see the playoffs again. If Cleveland finds they can't compete against the elite teams with both bigs on the court, then I think you explore moving Allen. But I'm making no decisions to split the core after a dominant regular season until I'm convinced it won't translate.
And no interest in trading him for a risk just to save some salary unless the governor comes out and just says we have to trim salary. I would definitely want a dependable replacement plus incentive towards upgrading somewhere else.
And no interest in trading him for a risk just to save some salary unless the governor comes out and just says we have to trim salary. I would definitely want a dependable replacement plus incentive towards upgrading somewhere else.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: Jarrett Allen availability, value, offers
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,789
- And1: 35,868
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Jarrett Allen availability, value, offers
Texas Chuck wrote:I want to see the playoffs again. If Cleveland finds they can't compete against the elite teams with both bigs on the court, then I think you explore moving Allen. But I'm making no decisions to split the core after a dominant regular season until I'm convinced it won't translate.
And no interest in trading him for a risk just to save some salary unless the governor comes out and just says we have to trim salary. I would definitely want a dependable replacement plus incentive towards upgrading somewhere else.
All of this. The Cavs won't even begin the clock on the repeater tax until next season.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Jarrett Allen availability, value, offers
- mcfly1204
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,911
- And1: 2,558
- Joined: Oct 31, 2008
Re: Jarrett Allen availability, value, offers
jbk1234 wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:I want to see the playoffs again. If Cleveland finds they can't compete against the elite teams with both bigs on the court, then I think you explore moving Allen. But I'm making no decisions to split the core after a dominant regular season until I'm convinced it won't translate.
And no interest in trading him for a risk just to save some salary unless the governor comes out and just says we have to trim salary. I would definitely want a dependable replacement plus incentive towards upgrading somewhere else.
All of this. The Cavs won't even begin the clock on the repeater tax until next season.
To add to that, had Cleveland not traded for Hunter, I could see a need where you'd consider moving Allen. At this point, what does Cleveland actually need?
Well at least we're not Detroit!
Re: Jarrett Allen availability, value, offers
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,258
- And1: 9,742
- Joined: Feb 04, 2005
- Location: San Francisco, CA
-
Re: Jarrett Allen availability, value, offers
mcfly1204 wrote:jbk1234 wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:I want to see the playoffs again. If Cleveland finds they can't compete against the elite teams with both bigs on the court, then I think you explore moving Allen. But I'm making no decisions to split the core after a dominant regular season until I'm convinced it won't translate.
And no interest in trading him for a risk just to save some salary unless the governor comes out and just says we have to trim salary. I would definitely want a dependable replacement plus incentive towards upgrading somewhere else.
All of this. The Cavs won't even begin the clock on the repeater tax until next season.
To add to that, had Cleveland not traded for Hunter, I could see a need where you'd consider moving Allen. At this point, what does Cleveland actually need?
Greater playoff success, and another quality big. That’s it, really.
(and maybe a bigger starting guard, but that’s risky, messing with your offense, so probably not)
Re: Jarrett Allen availability, value, offers
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,398
- And1: 7,500
- Joined: Feb 22, 2008
Re: Jarrett Allen availability, value, offers
Jarrett Allen is a very good basketball player. If Cleveland decides to trade him, it’s because they’ve realized that in the most important games of the season, they prefer not to play him down the stretch and instead move Mobley to the 5 for better spacing. With that in mind, you don’t trade Allen for a lesser center and a random draft pick. You’d want to trade him for a talented 3/4 that can close games for the Cavs. Trey Murphy makes sense, and Herb Jones with a decent draft pick could also work.
Of course, all of this depends on the playoff results. If the Cavs go to a Game 7 with Boston and Allen plays a significant role, there’s no reason to make a change. If the Cavs beat Boston, then again, no change is necessary.
Of course, all of this depends on the playoff results. If the Cavs go to a Game 7 with Boston and Allen plays a significant role, there’s no reason to make a change. If the Cavs beat Boston, then again, no change is necessary.
Re: Jarrett Allen availability, value, offers
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,398
- And1: 7,500
- Joined: Feb 22, 2008
Re: Jarrett Allen availability, value, offers
mcfly1204 wrote:jbk1234 wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:I want to see the playoffs again. If Cleveland finds they can't compete against the elite teams with both bigs on the court, then I think you explore moving Allen. But I'm making no decisions to split the core after a dominant regular season until I'm convinced it won't translate.
And no interest in trading him for a risk just to save some salary unless the governor comes out and just says we have to trim salary. I would definitely want a dependable replacement plus incentive towards upgrading somewhere else.
All of this. The Cavs won't even begin the clock on the repeater tax until next season.
To add to that, had Cleveland not traded for Hunter, I could see a need where you'd consider moving Allen. At this point, what does Cleveland actually need?
This is impossible to determine until after the playoffs. What if we reach an ECF matchup with Boston and it’s clear that our closing lineup is Garland, Mitchell, Strus, Hunter, and Mobley? If that’s the case, game after game, and the Cavs lose the series in 5 or an uncompetitive 6, I would argue that what Cleveland needs is an upgrade on the perimeter, particularly someone who can defend Boston’s wings. If we see Garland consistently isolated in one-on-one situations with Brown or Tatum, leading to defensive breakdowns, that’s another issue to consider.
I keep saying this, but a best-of-seven series against the top NBA teams is completely different from the regular season. It drives me crazy seeing Cleveland fans constantly arguing for a third big, as if it’s the missing piece. That third big won’t even see the floor in the games that truly matter.
Re: Jarrett Allen availability, value, offers
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,394
- And1: 907
- Joined: May 02, 2020
-
Re: Jarrett Allen availability, value, offers
A defensive forward and a bigger backup center?mcfly1204 wrote:jbk1234 wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:I want to see the playoffs again. If Cleveland finds they can't compete against the elite teams with both bigs on the court, then I think you explore moving Allen. But I'm making no decisions to split the core after a dominant regular season until I'm convinced it won't translate.
And no interest in trading him for a risk just to save some salary unless the governor comes out and just says we have to trim salary. I would definitely want a dependable replacement plus incentive towards upgrading somewhere else.
All of this. The Cavs won't even begin the clock on the repeater tax until next season.
To add to that, had Cleveland not traded for Hunter, I could see a need where you'd consider moving Allen. At this point, what does Cleveland actually need?
OG + Robinson for Allen + Okoro + Struss...
Garland/Mitchell/Hunter/OG/Mobley
*Jerome/FA/Tyson/Wade/Robinson
For the Knicks... well, Towns is almost unplayable defensively at the 5, and they need to improve their depth.
Brunson/Bridges/Hart/KAT/Allen
Mcbridge/Okoro/Struss/*Achiuwa/FA
Old Mike Lorenzo
Re: Jarrett Allen availability, value, offers
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,398
- And1: 7,500
- Joined: Feb 22, 2008
Re: Jarrett Allen availability, value, offers
Astaluego wrote:A defensive forward and a bigger backup center?mcfly1204 wrote:jbk1234 wrote:
All of this. The Cavs won't even begin the clock on the repeater tax until next season.
To add to that, had Cleveland not traded for Hunter, I could see a need where you'd consider moving Allen. At this point, what does Cleveland actually need?
OG + Robinson for Allen + Okoro + Struss...
Garland/Mitchell/Hunter/OG/Mobley
*Jerome/FA/Tyson/Wade/Robinson
For the Knicks... well, Towns is almost unplayable defensively at the 5, and they need to improve their depth.
Brunson/Bridges/Hart/KAT/Allen
Mcbridge/Okoro/Struss/*Achiuwa/FA
I like the idea of an OG for Allen swap, but I’m not including Strus. Strus is a tough defender who can shoot, and I want him come playoff time. I don’t see an OG trade that makes sense for Cleveland. The Cavs would need to add Okoro (I’m fine with that) and Tyson. The Cavs need Tyson to be a rotation player in the coming years, and I think he can fill that role. The Cavs could add Wade in, but I am still high on Wade. I don't view him as a throw-in. To me, he is a 6-9 3/4 that can play good defense and knock down an open 3. OG’s salary is probably just too high for the Cavs to make a serious move.
Re: Jarrett Allen availability, value, offers
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,789
- And1: 35,868
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Jarrett Allen availability, value, offers
Astaluego wrote:A defensive forward and a bigger backup center?mcfly1204 wrote:jbk1234 wrote:
All of this. The Cavs won't even begin the clock on the repeater tax until next season.
To add to that, had Cleveland not traded for Hunter, I could see a need where you'd consider moving Allen. At this point, what does Cleveland actually need?
OG + Robinson for Allen + Okoro + Struss...
Garland/Mitchell/Hunter/OG/Mobley
*Jerome/FA/Tyson/Wade/Robinson
For the Knicks... well, Towns is almost unplayable defensively at the 5, and they need to improve their depth.
Brunson/Bridges/Hart/KAT/Allen
Mcbridge/Okoro/Struss/*Achiuwa/FA
The Cavs issues the last two postseason runs have stemmed from injuries and depleted rosters. I can't see them trading for O.G. and Robinson. I'll let the Knicks run that risk.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Return to Trades and Transactions