ImNotMcDiSwear wrote:Saberestar wrote:Giddey for Caruso is one of the funniest trades of the last few years. 
People that want to lie to themselves would say that is a win-win for both the Bulls and the Thunder....but it's not.  No one will remember Caruso in a year or two. Giddey will be an All-Star pretty soon.
Giddey was a hidden treasure on the market and sadly we couldn't get him when his value was at all time low in the past summer. 
As a PG he is a big time player and this is the new version of James Harden traded for Kevin Martin + #12 pick all over again lol.
I remember about a year ago I was all aboard with grabbing Miles Bridges, and even KPJ (though he did not meet my expectations with LAC). Would have gone after Giddey as well. 
Ordinarily, I wouldn't have considered a guy like Miles Bridges, but Ishbia said he wanted to win at all costs. When you're in a position like ours, talent is the only thing that matters.
 
With the way the league has been trending,  high end athleticism and young  talent reigns supreme. And physicality is becoming prominent again too as everything in life is ultimately cyclical. 
 So as the league trends this way again more, adding players that fit that dynamic such as Miles Bridges and KPJr only make logical sense if we truly intend to be competitive and not the league's perennial joke and punching bag for all the bigger,  stronger and more physical teams. 
I get the social morality implications involved.  And we've experienced the outcome of prioritizing the high character,  "choir boy" soft, passive, intellectually focused foundation.  It's admirable but leaves us as the metaphoric little kid on the playground trying to play with the bigger,  stronger older kids and getting embarrassed and being the joke of the school.
Or like children from the chess and science club trying to compete against varsity football state champions. It's a nice hallmark premise. But not at all functionally logical.  We need to meet somewhere in the middle maintaining our high character values as an important foundational principle.
  But also not be afraid or averse to actually adding tough, edgy, physically dominant possibly even controversial or abrasive players to replace our passivity with tenacity and testicular fortitude and mental strength/ killer instinct. 
It's a similar premise ( again cyclical in nature) as when we added Charles Barkley to change our soft image and get tougher and edgier.  And obviously that paid off significantly.  We haven't really done anything close to that since. Just tried other random half measures. It might be time to reconsider everything??  
