clyde21 wrote:this FO loves these types, the toolsy types with traits who they think might be undervalued because they didn't play as well in college. they drafted Robert Beal and the dude started 10 games in 5 years in college, all based primarily on his traits
which means it wouldn't be surprise me at all if they take a Shemar Stewart or something at 11, just an athletic freak they think they can mold and develop into something more than he was in college.
There has been some of that. I think Kinlaw fits that mold, though he had one productive year. Lance obviously, though again he had the one good year. It seems like the Lance pick may have jarred them out of that, though. They haven't taken many risky players early since then.
Beal was a late fifth-rounder, so I don't think he's a great comparison point. At that point, your choice is usually the unathletic grinder or the athletic underachiever (or injury/character concerns, size concerns, etc.). I don't think there's necessarily a wrong pick - at least in terms of types - that late in the draft. Sometimes those picks hit, usually they don't. Only three DEs were taken after Beal: Ochaun Mathis, Andre Jones, Moro Ojomo. Only Mathis has really made any impact at all, and he is on his third team and has no career sacks. Beal has been a really good STs player and has been solid against the run, but he needs to improve his pass rush. He'll have a chance to show some growth this year. I was and am fine with that pick.