Lillard+ Bucks 31 for....
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Lillard+ Bucks 31 for....
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,394
- And1: 907
- Joined: May 02, 2020
-
Lillard+ Bucks 31 for....
I don't believe the Bucks or GA are going to part ways this offseason... not by their own will and not yet... before they do, they'll use every last round trying to avoid... the inevitable... That last round would be Lillard (assuming and praying he returns soon and fully healthy) + 31% RRP (projected, very valuable) + whatever salary/value they can attach...
What kind of trade do you think they could make that would give them the desire to try again?
What kind of trade do you think they could make that would give them the desire to try again?
Old Mike Lorenzo
Re: Lillard+ Bucks 31 for....
-
- King of the Trade Board
- Posts: 20,827
- And1: 7,794
- Joined: Aug 05, 2012
Re: Lillard+ Bucks 31 for....
I like Miami trading for Dame still. And like New Orleans if they want to keep trying to win with Zion..
So then you just need to find the third team that has a player worth “Miami asset / expirings” + Milwaukee first .. that helps Milwaukee more than just keeping Dame and trading the 2031 first else where with other matching salary..
I’d definitely put top 5-6 protection on that 2031 first though.. at that point the protection would be able to roll over to 2032.
So then you just need to find the third team that has a player worth “Miami asset / expirings” + Milwaukee first .. that helps Milwaukee more than just keeping Dame and trading the 2031 first else where with other matching salary..
I’d definitely put top 5-6 protection on that 2031 first though.. at that point the protection would be able to roll over to 2032.
Re: Lillard+ Bucks 31 for....
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 57,301
- And1: 18,402
- Joined: Jun 23, 2001
-
Re: Lillard+ Bucks 31 for....
No, thanks for Miami. Our timeline has reset. Dame is great, but I'm deadset against paying a fortune for older players in cash or assets. We need an early to mid-career guy...
Re: Lillard+ Bucks 31 for....
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,917
- And1: 13,852
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: Lillard+ Bucks 31 for....
i like orlando. Dame for Suggs/KCP as the core framework
Re: Lillard+ Bucks 31 for....
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,747
- And1: 2,269
- Joined: Jan 25, 2025
-
Re: Lillard+ Bucks 31 for....
Godaddycurse wrote:i like orlando. Dame for Suggs/KCP as the core framework
Dame isn't returning a Suggs-caliber player (a Good Starter on a long-term deal and still in the first 3rd of their career timeline).
Re: Lillard+ Bucks 31 for....
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,747
- And1: 2,269
- Joined: Jan 25, 2025
-
Re: Lillard+ Bucks 31 for....
Here are the teams I like for a Lillard acquisition (Not all including the Bucks '31 1st)
Detroit Pistons - Harris + Ivey + Filler
Dallas Mavericks - Kyrie + Marshall or Gafford + 1st
Minnesota Timberwolves (3-Team for Randle) - Randle + Conley + DDV
New Orleans Pelicans- CJ + Herb + Filler
Toronto Raptors - Quickley + RJ
Detroit Pistons - Harris + Ivey + Filler
Dallas Mavericks - Kyrie + Marshall or Gafford + 1st
Minnesota Timberwolves (3-Team for Randle) - Randle + Conley + DDV
New Orleans Pelicans- CJ + Herb + Filler
Toronto Raptors - Quickley + RJ
Re: Lillard+ Bucks 31 for....
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,394
- And1: 907
- Joined: May 02, 2020
-
Re: Lillard+ Bucks 31 for....
ReggiesKnicks wrote:Here are the teams I like for a Lillard acquisition (Not all including the Bucks '31 1st)
Detroit Pistons - Harris + Ivey + Filler
Dallas Mavericks - Kyrie + Marshall or Gafford + 1st
Minnesota Timberwolves (3-Team for Randle) - Randle + Conley + DDV
New Orleans Pelicans- CJ + Herb + Filler
Toronto Raptors - Quickley + RJ
I understand it would shorten Denver's window (something with Murray), but doesn't a Jokic/Dame combo look great? The Bucks get GA a younger co-star to convince him to stay... and the Kings? Monk/Lavine for Dame/Connaughton?
Old Mike Lorenzo
Re: Lillard+ Bucks 31 for....
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 797
- And1: 52
- Joined: Mar 13, 2003
- Location: The Steel City, PA
Re: Lillard+ Bucks 31 for....
As a Bucks fan for Dame I would look to Orlando, or Houston or maybe Miami.
Re: Lillard+ Bucks 31 for....
- babyjax13
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,011
- And1: 17,526
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Occupied Los Angeles
-
Re: Lillard+ Bucks 31 for....
zimpy27 wrote:I like Dame on the Rockets
I don't think there is anything here if the idea is to contend. If it isn't, something like FVV + an asset or two, with FVV being routed to a third team and an additional asset to Milwaukee makes sense.
TBH, I don't think there is a single trade involving Dame outgoing that would improve the Bucks. Instead they should be thinking about Kuzma + that 2031 1st, or some other filler. I could imagine a few teams offering up a good, non all-star player for that package (with other assets and/or roleplayers added to balance). I'm thinking players like: Nic Claxton/Cam Johnson/Malik Monk/Jakob Poeltl, etc.
Kuzma + 2031 MIL 1st
for
Johnson + 2025 HOU 1st (27)
Brooklyn turns Johnson into a high-upside pick. Milwaukee turns Kuzma into a much better player and gets a late pick to help back-fill the roster.
Lopez
Giannis
Johnson
Jackson
Dame

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.
JColl
Re: Lillard+ Bucks 31 for....
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,243
- And1: 3,904
- Joined: Jan 18, 2013
-
Re: Lillard+ Bucks 31 for....
Sexton, Collins, and filler if Utah gets the #1 pick. I don’t hate Dame, Lauri, Kessler, and Flagg.
Re: Lillard+ Bucks 31 for....
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,747
- And1: 2,269
- Joined: Jan 25, 2025
-
Re: Lillard+ Bucks 31 for....
Lillard + Bucks 31 for Ja Morant
Re: Lillard+ Bucks 31 for....
- babyjax13
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,011
- And1: 17,526
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Occupied Los Angeles
-
Re: Lillard+ Bucks 31 for....
AingesBurner wrote:Sexton, Collins, and filler if Utah gets the #1 pick. I don’t hate Dame, Lauri, Kessler, and Flagg.
That's horrible for Milwaukee, though.

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.
JColl
Re: Lillard+ Bucks 31 for....
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,789
- And1: 35,868
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: Lillard+ Bucks 31 for....
Can Dame even pass a physical right now? I think talks of trading him are premature. This isn't an injury. His medical issue needs to resolve.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Lillard+ Bucks 31 for....
- babyjax13
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,011
- And1: 17,526
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Occupied Los Angeles
-
Re: Lillard+ Bucks 31 for....
jbk1234 wrote:Can Dame even pass a physical right now? I think talks of trading him are premature. This isn't an injury. His medical issue needs to resolve.
He's supposed to come back this season (whether that happens or not...) so if true, he probably wouls be able to.

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.
JColl
Re: Lillard+ Bucks 31 for....
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,406
- And1: 1,436
- Joined: May 20, 2015
-
Re: Lillard+ Bucks 31 for....
Why? The Rockets are built on defense and Dame can't stay healthy at this point. Investing in over the hill stars is a bad idea for a team that is thriving with young pieces.
zimpy27 wrote:I like Dame on the Rockets
Re: Lillard+ Bucks 31 for....
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,747
- And1: 2,269
- Joined: Jan 25, 2025
-
Re: Lillard+ Bucks 31 for....
Jody Smokz wrote:Why? The Rockets are built on defense and Dame can't stay healthy at this point. Investing in over the hill stars is a bad idea for a team that is thriving with young pieces.zimpy27 wrote:I like Dame on the Rockets
Houston wouldn't need to invest much, that's the point.
Re: Lillard+ Bucks 31 for....
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,406
- And1: 1,436
- Joined: May 20, 2015
-
Re: Lillard+ Bucks 31 for....
You're thinking about the asset cost what about the on floor cost? Dame can't defend a dead body or move his feet well. They already don't have great rim protection. You add Dame to the mix you have to change things up defensively that takes away what makes the current team pretty good. It ain't the end of world to get him I don't think Dame moves the needle at all at this juncture.
As a younger team on the come up they have to think about matching up with OKC and San Antonio. Why hamstring your young team to 55M and 58M to a 35, 36 year old that can't stay healthy? Dame doesn't even make a team a for sure contender at this point.
1) Amen and Jalen Green improving next year
2) Upgrading their lead guard to someone better than Green and/or FVV but younger than Dame if possible.
These are better scenarios than chasing an old Dame
As a younger team on the come up they have to think about matching up with OKC and San Antonio. Why hamstring your young team to 55M and 58M to a 35, 36 year old that can't stay healthy? Dame doesn't even make a team a for sure contender at this point.
1) Amen and Jalen Green improving next year
2) Upgrading their lead guard to someone better than Green and/or FVV but younger than Dame if possible.
These are better scenarios than chasing an old Dame
ReggiesKnicks wrote:Jody Smokz wrote:Why? The Rockets are built on defense and Dame can't stay healthy at this point. Investing in over the hill stars is a bad idea for a team that is thriving with young pieces.zimpy27 wrote:I like Dame on the Rockets
Houston wouldn't need to invest much, that's the point.
Re: Lillard+ Bucks 31 for....
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,747
- And1: 2,269
- Joined: Jan 25, 2025
-
Re: Lillard+ Bucks 31 for....
Jody Smokz wrote:You're thinking about the asset cost what about the on floor cost? Dame can't defend a dead body or move his feet well. They already don't have great rim protection. You add Dame to the mix you have to change things up defensively that takes away what makes the current team pretty good. It ain't the end of world to get him I don't think Dame moves the needle at all at this juncture.
As a younger team on the come up they have to think about matching up with OKC and San Antonio. Why hamstring your young team to 55M and 58M to a 35, 36 year old that can't stay healthy? Dame doesn't even make a team a for sure contender at this point.
1) Amen and Jalen Green improving next year
2) Upgrading their lead guard to someone better than Green and/or FVV but younger than Dame if possible.
These are better scenarios than chasing an old DameReggiesKnicks wrote:Jody Smokz wrote:Why? The Rockets are built on defense and Dame can't stay healthy at this point. Investing in over the hill stars is a bad idea for a team that is thriving with young pieces.
Houston wouldn't need to invest much, that's the point.
On Floor cost?
Amen, Jabari, Eason, Tate and Brooks are all + to +++ defenders. We see in OKC they have been one of the best defensive teams in the NBA and they have been lacking true rim protection (Hartenstein isn't much better than Sengun in that regard and plays < 30 MPG as Chet has missed most of the season).
I think Dame clearly moves the needle for Houston. He gives them a go-to scorer and on-ball, High P&R creator, a wrinkle and angle they don't currently have. What you are going to see is Houston is far too limited offensively and they are going to struggle scoring the ball in the post-season aside from fast-break. Dame is still an elite P&R player and him/Amen running the P&R where Amen can catch and go to the rim or kick to the corner would be dynamic offensively.
Houston isn't far from being a contender, and their #1 need is an on-ball creator and go-to scorer in crunch time. Dame is still good enough to score the ball at a high level.
I never said this was the #1 player Houston should acquire. I do think Dame is a lot more realistic (and at a price) to acquire. Like you said, they need to upgrade Green/FVV but find someone younger than Dame. How many players actually fit this criteria and could be available? None? One? Who?
Re: Lillard+ Bucks 31 for....
- zimpy27
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 45,434
- And1: 43,571
- Joined: Jul 13, 2014
Re: Lillard+ Bucks 31 for....
babyjax13 wrote:zimpy27 wrote:I like Dame on the Rockets
I don't think there is anything here if the idea is to contend. If it isn't, something like FVV + an asset or two, with FVV being routed to a third team and an additional asset to Milwaukee makes sense.
TBH, I don't think there is a single trade involving Dame outgoing that would improve the Bucks. Instead they should be thinking about Kuzma + that 2031 1st, or some other filler. I could imagine a few teams offering up a good, non all-star player for that package (with other assets and/or roleplayers added to balance). I'm thinking players like: Nic Claxton/Cam Johnson/Malik Monk/Jakob Poeltl, etc.
Kuzma + 2031 MIL 1st
for
Johnson + 2025 HOU 1st (27)
Brooklyn turns Johnson into a high-upside pick. Milwaukee turns Kuzma into a much better player and gets a late pick to help back-fill the roster.
Lopez
Giannis
Johnson
Jackson
Dame
Well it would be Dame+Kuzma for FVV+Green
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Return to Trades and Transactions