Mattya wrote:I don’t see how he slips to the second round looking at some of the players mocked at the end of the first.
I was personally talking about using the DET pick on him, not the UTA pick.
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Mattya wrote:I don’t see how he slips to the second round looking at some of the players mocked at the end of the first.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Klomp wrote:Mattya wrote:I don’t see how he slips to the second round looking at some of the players mocked at the end of the first.
I was personally talking about using the DET pick on him, not the UTA pick.
winforlose wrote:I talked about the is elsewhere but here is our roster situation heading into next season
Guaranteed contracts
1. Ant
2. Rudy
3. Jaden
4. DDV
5. Mike
6. Dilly
7. TSJ
8. Clark
Non guaranteed contracts
9. Minott
10. Garza
11. Miller
UFAs
12. Randle
13. NAW
14. Naz
Picks
15. Detroit first
16. Pick 31 from Utah (not guaranteed, but likely a Hinkie special.)
Even if we drop Garza and trade Minott for picks (a risky move given that he has shown flashes of a legit NBA player,) we don’t have room for moves to balance the roster, we don’t have room for a tax payer MLE, or even for our 2nd. Either we are going to consolidate the picks, or make roster room for at least 2.
shrink wrote:winforlose wrote:I talked about the is elsewhere but here is our roster situation heading into next season
Guaranteed contracts
1. Ant
2. Rudy
3. Jaden
4. DDV
5. Mike
6. Dilly
7. TSJ
8. Clark
Non guaranteed contracts
9. Minott
10. Garza
11. Miller
UFAs
12. Randle
13. NAW
14. Naz
Picks
15. Detroit first
16. Pick 31 from Utah (not guaranteed, but likely a Hinkie special.)
Even if we drop Garza and trade Minott for picks (a risky move given that he has shown flashes of a legit NBA player,) we don’t have room for moves to balance the roster, we don’t have room for a tax payer MLE, or even for our 2nd. Either we are going to consolidate the picks, or make roster room for at least 2.
Two things. Just to address the youth side of the roster building equation.
1. Most successful teams carry a certain percentage of youth, for sustainability and for financial reasons. Connelly has done this as well, steering more towards youth that can provide some help now, rather than distant prospects. Clark, Dilly, TSJ and maybe even the DET 1st if we don’t take a project, could be helpful. But that takes minutes, minutes we might not have available depending on who we retain and our season goals. I like the balance.
2. Just a note, that I don’t think we would get even a single 2nd for Minott. It’s not that he’s not a better prospect than a 2nd, but teams can keep their 2nd and still get him with little more than a vet min offer. Players like Minott will be the 14th or 15th priority on most rosters, one of dozens and dozens of borderline NBA players that have some potential. If a team misses out on him, there are many other names on the list that they can roll the dice with.
I’m reminded of Bronnie James. When critics would say he’s only in the NBA because of his father, that isn’t quite true. Many teams have a couple young kids who have shown flashes of potential, and Bronnie isn’t the worst of them with NBA contracts. However, of the 40-50 that are in the NBA, there are probably 200 equally deserving players in the G-League, college or playing internationally that could take that spot. Minott is like that - he’s got potential, but now, after four seasons, there are many others with potential that could be alternatives. I’d be surprised if we could trade Josh for any pick at this point.
winforlose wrote:In a waiver situation Minott could land anywhere. If he clears waivers then he could be signed dirt cheap. But, I disagree that there are enough 6’8 high motor, high athleticism, 3 point capable, prospects out there not to risk a 2nd for his RFA rights. Again those rights help secure additional cheap years, and Minott had some good looking stints against some good teams this year. Personally I could see him being a black eye for Finch and TC because he is likely a rotation ready player on a good team. He looked like it in the preseason, in the regular season (before Finch destroyed his confidence,) and again towards the end of the regular season (10 points in 12 minutes against Denver.) If it’s not Minott dumped it could be Miller (another black eye for Finch and TC if he plays well elsewhere,) and that is before you even talk about how Garza is not an NBA player. My point in posting the roster situation was to ask the question are we looking for 2-3 picks, or do we consolidate?
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Klomp wrote:winforlose wrote:In a waiver situation Minott could land anywhere. If he clears waivers then he could be signed dirt cheap. But, I disagree that there are enough 6’8 high motor, high athleticism, 3 point capable, prospects out there not to risk a 2nd for his RFA rights. Again those rights help secure additional cheap years, and Minott had some good looking stints against some good teams this year. Personally I could see him being a black eye for Finch and TC because he is likely a rotation ready player on a good team. He looked like it in the preseason, in the regular season (before Finch destroyed his confidence,) and again towards the end of the regular season (10 points in 12 minutes against Denver.) If it’s not Minott dumped it could be Miller (another black eye for Finch and TC if he plays well elsewhere,) and that is before you even talk about how Garza is not an NBA player. My point in posting the roster situation was to ask the question are we looking for 2-3 picks, or do we consolidate?
"Black eye" has to be a joke, right?! If that's a black eye for him then so is Jarred Vanderbilt.
Sometimes opportunities don't come for a player on the team that drafted them....especially when you're talking about second round picks. But the talent evaluation was spot on. That to me is more important than whether or not that talent is realized as a member of the franchise that drafted the player.
Think about the talents that Tim Connelly has identified in the second round....heck, I'll even leave Nikola Jokic out of this discussion because that just makes it unfair.
2017: Monte Morris, Vlatko Cancar
2018: Jarred Vanderbilt
2019: Bol Bol
2022: Josh Minott
2023: Leonard Miller, Jaylen Clark
As far as second round draft records go for executives, that's a pretty successful run.
winforlose wrote:JV and Bol Bol both have had serious injury issues. I could be wrong but aren’t both centered around the feet? Minott has shown flashes and cannot get run. Miller was a high 2nd we traded up for who cannot get on the court. Even when guys were out Finch said that Garza in a slump was so much better than Miller, that Miller does not deserve the opportunity to even play 1 real minute. Clark was a defensive player of the year who slipped because of injury, not exactly a great find, more of a league wide blunder in not grabbing him higher. I guess in Clark’s case people thought he would be slower off the injury and never amount to anything. Still in the context of this discussion Minott could be a rotation player somewhere else because we knew what we had but didn’t give him opportunities. Clark is gonna be in the same boat if we keep NAW in that we are too heavy on 1-3 and Clark cannot play 4-5. Miller has not shown to be worth anything and if he does show it elsewhere that is an indictment on both Finch and TC on playing Garza over him.
Your point is that TC is great at finding talent, but if that talent doesn’t play for us or develop here that suggests something else. It suggests that Finch is a really bad coach, and TC is a bad GM for allowing a bad coach to fail to develop talented players.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Klomp wrote:winforlose wrote:JV and Bol Bol both have had serious injury issues. I could be wrong but aren’t both centered around the feet? Minott has shown flashes and cannot get run. Miller was a high 2nd we traded up for who cannot get on the court. Even when guys were out Finch said that Garza in a slump was so much better than Miller, that Miller does not deserve the opportunity to even play 1 real minute. Clark was a defensive player of the year who slipped because of injury, not exactly a great find, more of a league wide blunder in not grabbing him higher. I guess in Clark’s case people thought he would be slower off the injury and never amount to anything. Still in the context of this discussion Minott could be a rotation player somewhere else because we knew what we had but didn’t give him opportunities. Clark is gonna be in the same boat if we keep NAW in that we are too heavy on 1-3 and Clark cannot play 4-5. Miller has not shown to be worth anything and if he does show it elsewhere that is an indictment on both Finch and TC on playing Garza over him.
Your point is that TC is great at finding talent, but if that talent doesn’t play for us or develop here that suggests something else. It suggests that Finch is a really bad coach, and TC is a bad GM for allowing a bad coach to fail to develop talented players.
This isn't the Charlotte Bobcats. They're not stuck getting DNP-CDs behind Primoz Brezec or Adam Morrison.
This is what happens while building a good roster. Talented players do not get into the regular rotation. It doesn't mean the young players are busts or not developing.
younggunsmn wrote:Pistons beat the Raptors tonight and that pick will officially convey as they will clinch a top=6 seed.
Klomp wrote:Looking at Sorber, I get Gorgui Dieng vibes from hm. And that's not necessarily a bad thing.
winforlose wrote:Klomp wrote:winforlose wrote:JV and Bol Bol both have had serious injury issues. I could be wrong but aren’t both centered around the feet? Minott has shown flashes and cannot get run. Miller was a high 2nd we traded up for who cannot get on the court. Even when guys were out Finch said that Garza in a slump was so much better than Miller, that Miller does not deserve the opportunity to even play 1 real minute. Clark was a defensive player of the year who slipped because of injury, not exactly a great find, more of a league wide blunder in not grabbing him higher. I guess in Clark’s case people thought he would be slower off the injury and never amount to anything. Still in the context of this discussion Minott could be a rotation player somewhere else because we knew what we had but didn’t give him opportunities. Clark is gonna be in the same boat if we keep NAW in that we are too heavy on 1-3 and Clark cannot play 4-5. Miller has not shown to be worth anything and if he does show it elsewhere that is an indictment on both Finch and TC on playing Garza over him.
Your point is that TC is great at finding talent, but if that talent doesn’t play for us or develop here that suggests something else. It suggests that Finch is a really bad coach, and TC is a bad GM for allowing a bad coach to fail to develop talented players.
This isn't the Charlotte Bobcats. They're not stuck getting DNP-CDs behind Primoz Brezec or Adam Morrison.
This is what happens while building a good roster. Talented players do not get into the regular rotation. It doesn't mean the young players are busts or not developing.
You saw talented players getting minutes on winning teams to develop them this season. You saw rookie Wells starting for Memphis, you saw rookies and young players in the rotation for GSW. Finding minutes is sometimes about playing the best players less and still winning. We are so poorly coached we lost to a lot of bad teams with our best players. This held back Dilly, TSJ, and Minott from developing. As for the decision to keep and use Garza over Miller, that is inexcusable. Especially If you believe Miller has a higher ceiling than Garza and you understand the roster crunch next year. Developing young players to then leave and play against you while you bring in more expensive talent is not a winning formula. Your point is he hit on many 2nd round guys for us (Miller, Minott, Clark,) but if Miller and Minott blow up elsewhere how did drafting them benefit us?
minimus wrote:Klomp wrote:Looking at Sorber, I get Gorgui Dieng vibes from hm. And that's not necessarily a bad thing.
I get Dieng vibes when I look at Maluachi
shrink wrote:winforlose wrote:Klomp wrote:This isn't the Charlotte Bobcats. They're not stuck getting DNP-CDs behind Primoz Brezec or Adam Morrison.
This is what happens while building a good roster. Talented players do not get into the regular rotation. It doesn't mean the young players are busts or not developing.
You saw talented players getting minutes on winning teams to develop them this season. You saw rookie Wells starting for Memphis, you saw rookies and young players in the rotation for GSW. Finding minutes is sometimes about playing the best players less and still winning. We are so poorly coached we lost to a lot of bad teams with our best players. This held back Dilly, TSJ, and Minott from developing. As for the decision to keep and use Garza over Miller, that is inexcusable. Especially If you believe Miller has a higher ceiling than Garza and you understand the roster crunch next year. Developing young players to then leave and play against you while you bring in more expensive talent is not a winning formula. Your point is he hit on many 2nd round guys for us (Miller, Minott, Clark,) but if Miller and Minott blow up elsewhere how did drafting them benefit us?
Yeah if you play undeveloped youth over vets, it may only cost you 2-3 games this year .. not important in the standings, right?
MEM and GSW played some of their youth when they had injuries - exactly what Finch did, and discovered Jaylen Clark.
I don’t know if it’s your dislike for Finch, or specific love for Minott that leads you to this opinion. I read the exact opposite opinion from a neutral fan on the General board, praising how Finch has developed young players over the last three years.
minimus wrote:Latest mock from BR:
https://www.nba.com/news/bleacher-report-2025-nba-mock-draft-final-four19. Minnesota Timberwolves (via Pistons): Nolan Traore
31. Minnesota Timberwolves (via Jazz): Maxime Raynaud
But I rather take Sorber (22) or Wolf (21) or Rasheer Fleming (25) AND Bennett Stirtz (33) or Milos Uzan (35) or Adou Thiero (40)
winforlose wrote:I talked about the is elsewhere but here is our roster situation heading into next season
Guaranteed contracts
1. Ant
2. Rudy
3. Jaden
4. DDV
5. Mike
6. Dilly
7. TSJ
8. Clark
Non guaranteed contracts
9. Minott
10. Garza
11. Miller
UFAs
12. Randle
13. NAW
14. Naz
Picks
15. Detroit first
16. Pick 31 from Utah (not guaranteed, but likely a Hinkie special.)
Even if we drop Garza and trade Minott for picks (a risky move given that he has shown flashes of a legit NBA player,) we don’t have room for moves to balance the roster, we don’t have room for a tax payer MLE, or even for our 2nd. Either we are going to consolidate the picks, or make roster room for at least 2.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves