Game 79: Utah Jazz (16-62) @ Atlanta Hawks (36-41)
Moderators: Inigo Montoya, FJS
Game 79: Utah Jazz (16-62) @ Atlanta Hawks (36-41)
-
Inigo Montoya
- Forum Mod - Jazz
- Posts: 17,143
- And1: 8,417
- Joined: May 31, 2012
Game 79: Utah Jazz (16-62) @ Atlanta Hawks (36-41)
This feels like a trap game where the Jazz might surprise. The Wizards, on the other hand, are playing the Celtics in Boston and there is little chance there for a W.
Draft Nate Wolters - FAILED
Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED
Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED
KqWIN wrote:Why are we talking about Middleton, Harris, and Porter?
The real decision the Jazz FO is making is between Continuity, Cap Flexibility, and Cash Considerations.
Re: Game 79: Utah Jazz (16-62) @ Atlanta Hawks (36-41)
-
AGE1207
- Senior
- Posts: 616
- And1: 155
- Joined: Jan 13, 2017
-
Re: Game 79: Utah Jazz (16-62) @ Atlanta Hawks (36-41)
Not much of a trap game now was it? 
Re: Game 79: Utah Jazz (16-62) @ Atlanta Hawks (36-41)
-
Inigo Montoya
- Forum Mod - Jazz
- Posts: 17,143
- And1: 8,417
- Joined: May 31, 2012
Re: Game 79: Utah Jazz (16-62) @ Atlanta Hawks (36-41)
AGE1207 wrote:Not much of a trap game now was it?
A 12 point loss is almost like a 5 point win at this point
Draft Nate Wolters - FAILED
Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED
Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED
KqWIN wrote:Why are we talking about Middleton, Harris, and Porter?
The real decision the Jazz FO is making is between Continuity, Cap Flexibility, and Cash Considerations.