dremill24 wrote:Ghost of Kleine wrote:dremill24 wrote:
(for the record I am pro trading Booker, but)
Whats the best we could realistically expect in return from Houston for KD? Could we get Green, Smith, Eason, and one of our picks? Part of me feels like we probly only get three of those four assets or its Whitmore instead of Eason, but maybe? I can think of a few places to reroute Green and maybe even Eason if all that was on the table.
For KD to Houston, the best realistic package we could get would be some combination of D Brooks or J Green ( *due to his 30 million salary increase being a sizable trade filler)/ Maybe J Smith Jr/ Whitmore/ 2 of our picks back.
Or maybe D Brooks/ Sheppard/ J Smith Jr/ Whitmore/ 3 1sts. With Eason, it'd be an either or scenario of either JSmith Jr or Eason but not both. And if getting KD, they'd prefer to keep Eason and give up Smith Jr be the KD will be filling that spot anyways.
And they're strength is predicated upon their incredible defensive versatility at multiple positions. They'd most likely prefer to surround KD with high end defenders.
Also with Houston, it'd be all three picks and large mediocre fillers like Van Vleet/ Landale/ Whitmore and our 25, 27, and 29 1sts back.
Or 2-3 young core players and fillers and only one of our 1sts back. Maybe two if lucky?? Overall the very best value package we could possibly pull would be:
KD for J Green/ J Smith Jr/ Landale/ Whitmore/ PHX 25' 1st/ PHX 27' 1st.
Or
KD for D Brooks/ Sheppard/ J Smith Jr/ Eason/ PHX 25' 1st.................Maybe???

I think all that might be a little rich for Houston, but as an aside, Im curious why you think moving Brooks instead of Green as principal salary would make them willing to part with so much more? I know Green is younger but I'd have Brooks as a significantly better player right now and a much better fit with KD.
Because for Houston, they're already loaded with wing defenders. And need more dynamic scoring to help make them more competitively potent. Now by moving D Brooks, it allows them two key things ( in terms of fit):
First offensively, they'd have an offensive duo of J Green and Durant for more frontcourt/ backcourt scoring balance. Similar to our strategy around Booker and KD in having two dynamic scoring option/ shot creators, but also having multiple defenders as well.
And although J Green isn't nearly as efficient as Booker from the midrange, he's still a very potent 3 level scorer that could play well off off of Durant.
And second, defensively. D Brooks is obviously a good wing defender, but again, they're already loaded with high end/ elite defenders, like Thompson, Eason, Van Vleet, Adams, etc. So in moving D Brooks over Green, they can have:
PG- Van Vleet- Good defender.
SG - J Green- Potent scorer/ shot creator.
SF- Amen Thompson- Elite defender.
PF- KD - Elite scorer/ creator.
C- Sengun- Versatile scorer/ playmaker with solid defense and rim protection.
Again better balance between offense and defense throughout the lineup. This would allow them to surround KD with high end defenders.
And by keeping J Green over Brooks, that would also give them an explosive backcourt scoring option ( shot creator) so that the opposition couldn't focus in on KD as easily as if it were D Brooks who's a good spot up shooter but not really a creator.
Van Vleet/ J Green/ Thompson/ KD / Sengun.
Holiday/ Sheppard/ Eason/ Landale/ Adams? I'm sure they'd like to move J Green's salary though ( to your point) and honestly I'd much rather have him in the deal because I see him having star potential ( maybe not superstar though)?? And would prioritize keeping him to see what he could become for us.
But I think the rockets will strongly consider the alternative too for the reasons that I've mentioned above.
