Image ImageImage Image

Josh Giddey - Conundrum Killer

Moderators: HomoSapien, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man

MissileMike
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,479
And1: 1,283
Joined: Feb 25, 2002

Re: Josh Giddey - Conundrum Killer 

Post#1841 » by MissileMike » Fri Apr 4, 2025 5:33 pm

WindyCityBorn wrote:
KissedByaRose1 wrote:I like Kumana's ceiling more than Giddeys probably but he's clearly delusional. If you're butting heads on a team with Kerr/Steph then you're likely going to be a headache anywhere.

I liked Giddey a ton more a month ago when he was 20-25 a year. At the end of the day i like his playmaking and size so much that i would be ok for 4 and 120. But man oh man, he really needs to strive to improve as a defender. He's ever going to shut his guy down but the last 3 games i've watched have been pretty pathetic even from an effort level.

Not running back in transition/late on rotations costs your team lots of points fast in todays modern NBA. Not nearly as humiliating as getting blown by on the perimeter over and over again I don't think casuals understand how damaging guys like Giddey/Lavine can be structurally to your defense. We need an Ime or Thibs as our head coach really badly.


Kuminga will not have a better career than Giddey.


I hope the nets disagree.
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,394
And1: 9,088
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Josh Giddey - Conundrum Killer 

Post#1842 » by Chi town » Fri Apr 4, 2025 5:45 pm

Jcool0 wrote:
Read on Twitter


Boys are white as wonder bread but they can hoop!
MrSparkle
RealGM
Posts: 23,371
And1: 11,179
Joined: Jul 31, 2003
Location: chicago

Re: Josh Giddey - Conundrum Killer 

Post#1843 » by MrSparkle » Fri Apr 4, 2025 5:48 pm

Giddey is a bit of an enigma, but you can’t say his ceiling is dismissible after this season. He’s almost averaging a triple-double while having positive BPMs on both ends on a sub-500 team.

Kuminga is a fringe net-negative/neutral on a winning team. His percentages kinda suck. This said he’s been a project. When he’s on, he’s a star caliber 2-way wing. Could be a Barnes, Marvin, Aminu type of journey-man tweener… short peak. But his on-ball skills have improved. Who knows- could be very different in a #1 role. Higher volume, more confidence. Just don’t think he’s worth big money based on his 4y rookie contract.

Giddey’s got his risks. I still think ankle/knee health and athleticism are the biggest ones, despite not having had a major injury yet. His running gait and hops look risky. He’s only 22, but he moves like Brad Miller at the end of his career. His skill set (sans 3P shooting) is elite, though. And Jokic (and Luka) defied all odds for their weight and lateral foot-speed. Difference being those were iso shooting/scoring machines on top of everything.
sco
RealGM
Posts: 27,349
And1: 9,177
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: Josh Giddey - Conundrum Killer 

Post#1844 » by sco » Fri Apr 4, 2025 9:25 pm

MrSparkle wrote:Giddey is a bit of an enigma, but you can’t say his ceiling is dismissible after this season. He’s almost averaging a triple-double while having positive BPMs on both ends on a sub-500 team.

Kuminga is a fringe net-negative/neutral on a winning team. His percentages kinda suck. This said he’s been a project. When he’s on, he’s a star caliber 2-way wing. Could be a Barnes, Marvin, Aminu type of journey-man tweener… short peak. But his on-ball skills have improved. Who knows- could be very different in a #1 role. Higher volume, more confidence. Just don’t think he’s worth big money based on his 4y rookie contract.

Giddey’s got his risks. I still think ankle/knee health and athleticism are the biggest ones, despite not having had a major injury yet. His running gait and hops look risky. He’s only 22, but he moves like Brad Miller at the end of his career. His skill set (sans 3P shooting) is elite, though. And Jokic (and Luka) defied all odds for their weight and lateral foot-speed. Difference being those were iso shooting/scoring machines on top of everything.

I know he plays physical, but I like that his game is not about juking or jumping. It's north/south/ground-bound, which IMO bodes better for staying healthy.
:clap:
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,138
And1: 11,823
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Josh Giddey - Conundrum Killer 

Post#1845 » by WindyCityBorn » Fri Apr 4, 2025 9:29 pm

MrSparkle wrote:Giddey is a bit of an enigma, but you can’t say his ceiling is dismissible after this season. He’s almost averaging a triple-double while having positive BPMs on both ends on a sub-500 team.

Kuminga is a fringe net-negative/neutral on a winning team. His percentages kinda suck. This said he’s been a project. When he’s on, he’s a star caliber 2-way wing. Could be a Barnes, Marvin, Aminu type of journey-man tweener… short peak. But his on-ball skills have improved. Who knows- could be very different in a #1 role. Higher volume, more confidence. Just don’t think he’s worth big money based on his 4y rookie contract.

Giddey’s got his risks. I still think ankle/knee health and athleticism are the biggest ones, despite not having had a major injury yet. His running gait and hops look risky. He’s only 22, but he moves like Brad Miller at the end of his career. His skill set (sans 3P shooting) is elite, though. And Jokic (and Luka) defied all odds for their weight and lateral foot-speed. Difference being those were iso shooting/scoring machines on top of everything.


The last thing I would consider Giddey is a major injury risk. Guy has been incredibly durable so far. Every basketball player going to have ankle and knee injuries. Landing on someone’s foot 70 games into the season doesn’t make you injury prone.
MrSparkle
RealGM
Posts: 23,371
And1: 11,179
Joined: Jul 31, 2003
Location: chicago

Re: Josh Giddey - Conundrum Killer 

Post#1846 » by MrSparkle » Fri Apr 4, 2025 9:38 pm

WindyCityBorn wrote:
MrSparkle wrote:Giddey is a bit of an enigma, but you can’t say his ceiling is dismissible after this season. He’s almost averaging a triple-double while having positive BPMs on both ends on a sub-500 team.

Kuminga is a fringe net-negative/neutral on a winning team. His percentages kinda suck. This said he’s been a project. When he’s on, he’s a star caliber 2-way wing. Could be a Barnes, Marvin, Aminu type of journey-man tweener… short peak. But his on-ball skills have improved. Who knows- could be very different in a #1 role. Higher volume, more confidence. Just don’t think he’s worth big money based on his 4y rookie contract.

Giddey’s got his risks. I still think ankle/knee health and athleticism are the biggest ones, despite not having had a major injury yet. His running gait and hops look risky. He’s only 22, but he moves like Brad Miller at the end of his career. His skill set (sans 3P shooting) is elite, though. And Jokic (and Luka) defied all odds for their weight and lateral foot-speed. Difference being those were iso shooting/scoring machines on top of everything.


The last thing I would consider Giddey is a major injury risk. Guy has been incredibly durable so far. Every basketball player going to have ankle and knee injuries. Landing on someone’s foot 70 games into the season doesn’t make you injury prone.


Eh. I dunno. This was literally the first game I ever watched of his (I tuned in). Maybe it made a lasting impression:

https://youtu.be/pEMD1RE8Zng?si=w40rt3SWD6mFs-Jw

Didn’t help that he also hurt himself badly on a drive in the Olympics.
User avatar
nomorezorro
RealGM
Posts: 13,197
And1: 10,295
Joined: Jun 22, 2006
Location: bfk

Re: Josh Giddey - Conundrum Killer 

Post#1847 » by nomorezorro » Sat Apr 5, 2025 12:54 am

are we sure that coundrum is dead
WookieOnRitalin wrote:Game 1. It's where the series is truly 0-0.
Dez
General Manager
Posts: 7,707
And1: 9,263
Joined: Jul 23, 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
 

Re: Josh Giddey - Conundrum Killer 

Post#1848 » by Dez » Sat Apr 5, 2025 3:36 am

nomorezorro wrote:are we sure that coundrum is dead

Yes.
User avatar
NecessaryEvil
RealGM
Posts: 10,237
And1: 7,631
Joined: Jun 12, 2014
 

Re: Josh Giddey - Conundrum Killer 

Post#1849 » by NecessaryEvil » Sat Apr 5, 2025 3:50 am

Chi town wrote:
Jcool0 wrote:
Read on Twitter


Boys are white as wonder bread but they can hoop!


lol
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,138
And1: 11,823
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Josh Giddey - Conundrum Killer 

Post#1850 » by WindyCityBorn » Sat Apr 5, 2025 4:15 am

nomorezorro wrote:are we sure that coundrum is dead


Yes.

Even on bad shooting nights he is dropping videogame level triple doubles.
kodo
RealGM
Posts: 21,068
And1: 15,455
Joined: Oct 10, 2006
Location: Northshore Burbs
 

Re: Josh Giddey - Conundrum Killer 

Post#1851 » by kodo » Sat Apr 5, 2025 4:52 am

nomorezorro wrote:are we sure that coundrum is dead


15/19/12 on a bad night is pretty much insanity. Only two players have achieved those #s, one won MVP the other is Luka.
If that's your off night, you might be worth the same salary as Jerami Grant.
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 29,394
And1: 9,088
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Josh Giddey - Conundrum Killer 

Post#1852 » by Chi town » Sat Apr 5, 2025 3:18 pm

Giddey’s competitiveness and constant movement with his elite IQ truly cover for his weaknesses.

Imagine the 3 ball keeps improving with volume.
Imagine the handle takes a step like Coby’s has
Imagine Bulls get a lob threat at C


We are looking at a truly elite offensive engine that gives his team an identity (Running, Passing, 3s) and makes everyone better like True PGs do.

Only have one question left for Giddey…

How can he play better against great athletes? He only struggles when he plays elite athletes that play physical.
Houston_Bulls
Ballboy
Posts: 45
And1: 30
Joined: Dec 29, 2017

Re: Josh Giddey - Conundrum Killer 

Post#1853 » by Houston_Bulls » Sat Apr 5, 2025 3:59 pm

I am 100% on the Giddey hype train. This guy is a winner. He's extremely resilient. The fact that he can immediately recover from being benched and traded to playing at an All-Star level proves it. He also improved his shot, which proves that he actually works on his game.

The only real concern with Giddey is his injuries, but it isn't a huge concern.
User avatar
Jahensle
Veteran
Posts: 2,687
And1: 378
Joined: Nov 24, 2009
Location: Rio Grande Valley, TX
     

Re: Josh Giddey - Conundrum Killer 

Post#1854 » by Jahensle » Sat Apr 5, 2025 4:04 pm

NecessaryEvil wrote:
Chi town wrote:
Jcool0 wrote:
Read on Twitter


Boys are white as wonder bread but they can hoop!


lol


I would love to resign Huerter to an extension. Just wondering what that number would look like. I believe he is currently making like 17 million. 4 / 60 seems like something he might be willing to take after his downtrend in SAC. Similarly, getting Collins back as our backup C for the foreseeable future at a lower number. Would be a solid backup to whatever big we draft this year (assuming we draft a big).
cocktailswith_2short
Head Coach
Posts: 6,945
And1: 459
Joined: May 25, 2002
     

Re: Josh Giddey - Conundrum Killer 

Post#1855 » by cocktailswith_2short » Sat Apr 5, 2025 4:13 pm

Red velvet looks happy to be a bull I think he stays with us on a reasonable deal . He fits the timeline for the team and seems to have good chemistry with our guys.
PJSteven22
Starter
Posts: 2,197
And1: 918
Joined: Feb 04, 2022

Re: Josh Giddey - Conundrum Killer 

Post#1856 » by PJSteven22 » Tue Apr 8, 2025 4:04 pm

Dez wrote:
nomorezorro wrote:are we sure that coundrum is dead

Yes.

We won’t know until the postseason, it’s looks promising.
MrSparkle
RealGM
Posts: 23,371
And1: 11,179
Joined: Jul 31, 2003
Location: chicago

Re: Josh Giddey - Conundrum Killer 

Post#1857 » by MrSparkle » Tue Apr 8, 2025 4:41 pm

Thinking this over… Brooklyn has over $100M to spend, 0.1% win-(chip)-now aspirations as a young team, an incoming top-7 pick, an Australian GM (who has pursued several Aussies): Mills, Simmons, technically Kyrie… and nothing to lose. Giddey is borderline averaging a triple-double.

I think unless Nets draft a full-time playmaker (namely Harper… VJ, Kasparas to a lesser extent), I’m about 90% expecting them to make that $166M/4Y max offer to Giddey. Which wouldn’t be the end of the world to match (better than giving him the $224M/5Y extension with larger raises). But it’s starting to feel like that max offer is Giddey’s to lose. He really raised his stock last month, and I can’t think of 1 other team in the NBA as potentially interested/fitting as Brooklyn. :oops:
User avatar
Jcool0
RealGM
Posts: 15,301
And1: 9,284
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Location: Illinois
         

Re: Josh Giddey - Conundrum Killer 

Post#1858 » by Jcool0 » Tue Apr 8, 2025 4:45 pm

Jahensle wrote:
NecessaryEvil wrote:
Chi town wrote:
Boys are white as wonder bread but they can hoop!


lol


I would love to resign Huerter to an extension. Just wondering what that number would look like. I believe he is currently making like 17 million. 4 / 60 seems like something he might be willing to take after his downtrend in SAC. Similarly, getting Collins back as our backup C for the foreseeable future at a lower number. Would be a solid backup to whatever big we draft this year (assuming we draft a big).


Alex Caruso just signed for 4/81. So if Huerter stays at his currently level that will be what he is looking for. I am guessing the Bulls will let him walk.
User avatar
DuckIII
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 71,649
And1: 36,991
Joined: Nov 25, 2003
Location: On my high horse.
     

Re: Josh Giddey - Conundrum Killer 

Post#1859 » by DuckIII » Tue Apr 8, 2025 4:48 pm

PJSteven22 wrote:
Dez wrote:
nomorezorro wrote:are we sure that coundrum is dead

Yes.

We won’t know until the postseason, it’s looks promising.


Why? That will likely be 1-6 games. Why would that matter more than 30 games? I’m not saying it’s irrelevant. But the notion that somehow what we’ve seen doesn’t really count or something until we see how he plays in a few postseason games with a woefully incomplete roster doesn’t land.
Once a pickle, never a cucumber again.
MGB8
RealGM
Posts: 18,993
And1: 3,621
Joined: Jul 20, 2001
Location: Philly

Re: Josh Giddey - Conundrum Killer 

Post#1860 » by MGB8 » Tue Apr 8, 2025 5:25 pm

MrSparkle wrote:Thinking this over… Brooklyn has over $100M to spend, 0.1% win-(chip)-now aspirations as a young team, an incoming top-7 pick, an Australian GM (who has pursued several Aussies): Mills, Simmons, technically Kyrie… and nothing to lose. Giddey is borderline averaging a triple-double.

I think unless Nets draft a full-time playmaker (namely Harper… VJ, Kasparas to a lesser extent), I’m about 90% expecting them to make that $166M/4Y max offer to Giddey. Which wouldn’t be the end of the world to match (better than giving him the $224M/5Y extension with larger raises). But it’s starting to feel like that max offer is Giddey’s to lose. He really raised his stock last month, and I can’t think of 1 other team in the NBA as potentially interested/fitting as Brooklyn. :oops:


I doubt it. Not that Giddey wouldn’t fit with Cam Thomas and Cam Johnson - he would. But I also don’t think he would make them a top 4 team in the East. Brooklyn seems to be looking for a complete rebuild, having moved current assets for future ones. They tried to move Cam Johnson, too, but didn’t get a good enough offer. I think Brooklyn is looking for “the guy,” and while I like Giddey, I don’t view him as a legit “the guy” candidate. Don’t forget that Cam Thomas is going to get a big raise - as a guy putting up stats better than Coby’s over the course of a season, and putting up similar level stats for 2 years in a row (and two years younger than Coby).

Don’t forget that the 2nd apron really makes “bad” Max contracts hurt. A lot. Hence Brandon Ingram traded for pennies, and Zach despite rehabbing himself similarly traded for little.

I mean, who knows - they may decide that Giddey-Cam-Cam-Claxton-draft pick wing or guard plus maybe resigned Zaire Williams is the group they want to build around. But like with the Bulls, we’re talking about a group that gives you a punchers chance, at best. Bulls hopes for anything more than play in / low seed are based on Matas exploding. Meanwhile, Cam Johnson is older than Lonzo Ball…

Return to Chicago Bulls