boozapalooza wrote:WindyCityBorn wrote:Infinity2152 wrote:Jokic makes $55 mill next year. Our expensive players are Vucevic, Williams, Collins and Huerter. Then we don't have the defensive rim protecting PF next to him Denver you need next to Jokic, same problem we've had with Vuc. Maybe a trade of a re-signed Giddey, Vucevic and 6 firsts and 6 pick swaps would have some interest. Hopefully they don't make us include Coby too.
We're left basically with Coby, Matas and Jokic as the replacements for Jamal Murray and Aaron Gordon.
Jokic is 30, and has a player option in 2027. Have no idea how his body will hold up the next few years, but we're certainly looking at a max extension probably in 2026. Or max contract for a 32 yr old in 2027. We've given up our draft capital for years, so there's no adding rookies to help. Would be great to get 25 yr old Jokic, not giving up a 23 yr old Giddey and our best picks for the next 12 years for a 30 year old Jokic. Most NBA players retire in their early to mid 30's, especially centers.
This is exactly the type of move people have been complaining AK does. Trade future draft picks and young assets for older win now players. If Jokic is injured or leaves in free agency, we have very little left and our future sucks. The number of picks this would cost should be a deal killer to anybody who really believes in build through the draft.
I have zero interest in Jokic. Yes he is an all-time great, but he’s on the wrong side of 30 and we would have to gut our team to get him. It’s not like he guarantees championships by himself.
We need to stick with our youth movement. Stop looking for quick fixes.
You’d have to be insane to have ZERO interest in Jokic. I’d give up our entire team, Matas included, and toss in The Bean and Willis Tower if needed.
No chance Denver moves him. I do think he leaves once his deal is up and joins Luka in LA, unfortunately.
Ahem, it's the Sears Tower.














