ImageImageImageImageImage

PG Knicks/Pistons

Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

User avatar
Gravy
Head Coach
Posts: 7,079
And1: 9,538
Joined: Jun 25, 2015
     

Re: PG Knicks/Pistons 

Post#201 » by Gravy » Fri Apr 11, 2025 3:42 pm

Guano wrote:
Knicksfan1992 wrote:The Knicks tanked this game..

Brunson's ankle will be "sore" tomorrow.

KAT will have injury management.

We're trying to get to Cleveland's side of the bracket.

Wonder if Indiana recognizes and tanks themselves?


This is weak af and embarrassing if true.

Tankers get a small victory in the Thibs era
User avatar
TheGreenArrow
RealGM
Posts: 27,742
And1: 43,313
Joined: Sep 13, 2017

Re: PG Knicks/Pistons 

Post#202 » by TheGreenArrow » Fri Apr 11, 2025 3:42 pm

Guano wrote:
TheGreenArrow wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g

This is our captain and no runs in to defend him or push schroder out of the way???!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Smfh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


What the hell happened to the knicks we loved.


This sums up this season and our teams new culture perfectly.


Super soft man!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I’ve been trying to fight it but it’s too obvious now!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Last offseason was a disaster from the bridges trade to the Kat trade!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Just an unmitigated disaster!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
spree2kawhi
RealGM
Posts: 12,610
And1: 5,742
Joined: Mar 01, 2005

Re: PG Knicks/Pistons 

Post#203 » by spree2kawhi » Fri Apr 11, 2025 3:43 pm

MrDollarBills wrote:
DOT wrote:
MrDollarBills wrote:Not having KAT and Mitch play enough minutes together concerns me

KAT and Mitch together defeats the purpose of having KAT

Might as well have just kept Randle at that point.


KAT is defensively is a PF to me, Mitch is the guy who anchors and works better at the 5 in Tom's scheme.

Mitch/KAT/OG/Bridges/Brunson should be the play. If I'm gonna have a non shooter out there, let it be Mitch who defends and is a threat to finish.

Absolutely. This has nothing to do with Randle…
User avatar
TheGreenArrow
RealGM
Posts: 27,742
And1: 43,313
Joined: Sep 13, 2017

Re: PG Knicks/Pistons 

Post#204 » by TheGreenArrow » Fri Apr 11, 2025 3:44 pm

TheGreenArrow wrote:
Guano wrote:
TheGreenArrow wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g

This is our captain and no runs in to defend him or push schroder out of the way???!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Smfh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


What the hell happened to the knicks we loved.


This sums up this season and our teams new culture perfectly.


Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g

Super soft man!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I’ve been trying to fight it but it’s too obvious now!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Last offseason was a disaster from the bridges trade to the Kat trade!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Just an unmitigated disaster!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
User avatar
Guano
RealGM
Posts: 39,400
And1: 66,651
Joined: Dec 16, 2010
Location: any port

Re: PG Knicks/Pistons 

Post#205 » by Guano » Fri Apr 11, 2025 3:45 pm

Gravy wrote:
Guano wrote:
Knicksfan1992 wrote:The Knicks tanked this game..

Brunson's ankle will be "sore" tomorrow.

KAT will have injury management.

We're trying to get to Cleveland's side of the bracket.

Wonder if Indiana recognizes and tanks themselves?


This is weak af and embarrassing if true.

Tankers get a small victory in the Thibs era


Im cool with tanking for talent. Tanking to duck a team - that's bįtch sht. I cant respect it.
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
JayTWill
Veteran
Posts: 2,703
And1: 1,770
Joined: May 14, 2011

Re: PG Knicks/Pistons 

Post#206 » by JayTWill » Fri Apr 11, 2025 3:46 pm

Gravy wrote:They said Deuce in the starting lineup would fix the shooting. If Deuce is going to shoot as bad as Hart then you may as well leave Hart in the sl to get you a triple double.


I believe the argument was it would provide better spacing. Swapping OG with Precious kind of prevented the opportunity to see if it made a difference but lets come to a conclusion after 1 game missing 3 rotation players and other key players getting limited minutes. :D
User avatar
Guano
RealGM
Posts: 39,400
And1: 66,651
Joined: Dec 16, 2010
Location: any port

Re: PG Knicks/Pistons 

Post#207 » by Guano » Fri Apr 11, 2025 3:48 pm

TheGreenArrow wrote:
Guano wrote:
TheGreenArrow wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g

This is our captain and no runs in to defend him or push schroder out of the way???!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Smfh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


What the hell happened to the knicks we loved.


This sums up this season and our teams new culture perfectly.


Super soft man!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I’ve been trying to fight it but it’s too obvious now!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Last offseason was a disaster from the bridges trade to the Kat trade!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Just an unmitigated disaster!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


I cant believe we let Schroeder stand over Brunson like that.

Precious needs to be cut and everyone else on the floor disgust me.

Im disgusted and embarrassed.

Shameful display from our team.
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
User avatar
MrDollarBills
RealGM
Posts: 77,455
And1: 54,313
Joined: Feb 15, 2008
       

Re: PG Knicks/Pistons 

Post#208 » by MrDollarBills » Fri Apr 11, 2025 3:50 pm

DOT wrote:
MrDollarBills wrote:
DOT wrote:KAT and Mitch together defeats the purpose of having KAT

Might as well have just kept Randle at that point.


KAT is defensively is a PF to me, Mitch is the guy who anchors and works better at the 5 in Tom's scheme.

Mitch/KAT/OG/Bridges/Brunson should be the play. If I'm gonna have a non shooter out there, let it be Mitch who defends and is a threat to finish.

Like I said

You might as well have just kept Randle at that point.


KAT is the better talent though and Mitch was not available to start the season, and the only other bigs were Sims and Huk.

I don't disagree that KAT should not be anchoring the defense but I don't think trading Randle for him was a bad move at all. But Tom continuing to play him at the 5 and in drop is just asinine.
Please consider donating blood: https://www.nybc.org/

2025-2026 Indiana Pacers

C: J. Valanciunas/C. Castleton
PF: K. Kuzma/J. Robinson-Earl
SF: T. Evbuomwan/J. Howard
SG: T. Hardaway Jr./C. Williams
PG: C. Payne/J. Springer
User avatar
god shammgod
RealGM
Posts: 138,633
And1: 137,507
Joined: Feb 18, 2006

Re: PG Knicks/Pistons 

Post#209 » by god shammgod » Fri Apr 11, 2025 3:56 pm

pj out here calling the team soft now....sad


They just out-toughed us. They did. The whole fourth quarter,” said PJ Tucker, the veteran who received rotation minutes for the first time this season. “We kept it close but they just out-toughed us. That’s something we got to address. Obviously, not having OG [Anunoby], not having Josh [Hart], getting those guys back will help a lot.

“I just feel like down in the trenches like that in the playoffs this year, they’re not calling nothing. They’re letting a lot of stuff go right now and I like it. The refs are letting a lot of stuff go both ways. With that happening, guys got to play differently. We got to play different. We got to toughen up. It’s more physical. We got to toughen up.


https://nypost.com/2025/04/10/sports/knicks-fail-to-lock-up-no-3-seed-in-loss-to-pesky-pistons/?utm_campaign=iphone_nyp&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social
User avatar
Guano
RealGM
Posts: 39,400
And1: 66,651
Joined: Dec 16, 2010
Location: any port

Re: PG Knicks/Pistons 

Post#210 » by Guano » Fri Apr 11, 2025 4:00 pm

god shammgod wrote:pj out here calling the team soft now....sad


They just out-toughed us. They did. The whole fourth quarter,” said PJ Tucker, the veteran who received rotation minutes for the first time this season. “We kept it close but they just out-toughed us. That’s something we got to address. Obviously, not having OG [Anunoby], not having Josh [Hart], getting those guys back will help a lot.

“I just feel like down in the trenches like that in the playoffs this year, they’re not calling nothing. They’re letting a lot of stuff go right now and I like it. The refs are letting a lot of stuff go both ways. With that happening, guys got to play differently. We got to play different. We got to toughen up. It’s more physical. We got to toughen up.


https://nypost.com/2025/04/10/sports/knicks-fail-to-lock-up-no-3-seed-in-loss-to-pesky-pistons/?utm_campaign=iphone_nyp&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social


Rightfully so - relying on gramps to be the inforcer is embarrassing in of itself
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
User avatar
rajajackal
General Manager
Posts: 7,657
And1: 9,788
Joined: Nov 04, 2013

Re: PG Knicks/Pistons 

Post#211 » by rajajackal » Fri Apr 11, 2025 4:01 pm

3toheadmelo wrote:
rajajackal wrote:
MrDollarBills wrote:
KAT is defensively is a PF to me, Mitch is the guy who anchors and works better at the 5 in Tom's scheme.

Mitch/KAT/OG/Bridges/Brunson should be the play. If I'm gonna have a non shooter out there, let it be Mitch who defends and is a threat to finish.

also, kat was doing things like blocking out for mitch. he may suck at defense, but he puts in a more consistent effort than randle. having those two 7 footers down low is a totally different presence than mitch/randle gave us. i hoped kat at c would suffice, but i'm all in on the twin towers at this point

Yeah idk about KAT giving effort. Too many times he is ball watching and does the laziest close outs ever. Thats why he’s literally graded at the bottom of centers on defense on metrics. We never had that problem before.

like i said, he sucks (feet and awareness) but he does give effort. that's why he makes so many stupid defensive fouls. if i didn't compare the effort level to randle's you would have let it rock :lol: but i'm saying if your starting PF is gonna suck at defense (whether due to ability like kat or due to feeling exempt from it like randle) him being 7 ft down low just makes mitch's job much easier than 6'9 does
User avatar
god shammgod
RealGM
Posts: 138,633
And1: 137,507
Joined: Feb 18, 2006

Re: PG Knicks/Pistons 

Post#212 » by god shammgod » Fri Apr 11, 2025 4:03 pm

Guano wrote:
god shammgod wrote:pj out here calling the team soft now....sad


They just out-toughed us. They did. The whole fourth quarter,” said PJ Tucker, the veteran who received rotation minutes for the first time this season. “We kept it close but they just out-toughed us. That’s something we got to address. Obviously, not having OG [Anunoby], not having Josh [Hart], getting those guys back will help a lot.

“I just feel like down in the trenches like that in the playoffs this year, they’re not calling nothing. They’re letting a lot of stuff go right now and I like it. The refs are letting a lot of stuff go both ways. With that happening, guys got to play differently. We got to play different. We got to toughen up. It’s more physical. We got to toughen up.


https://nypost.com/2025/04/10/sports/knicks-fail-to-lock-up-no-3-seed-in-loss-to-pesky-pistons/?utm_campaign=iphone_nyp&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social


Rightfully so - relying on gramps to be the inforcer is embarrassing in of itself


everybody wondered why he was here. now you know. :lol:
User avatar
rajajackal
General Manager
Posts: 7,657
And1: 9,788
Joined: Nov 04, 2013

Re: PG Knicks/Pistons 

Post#213 » by rajajackal » Fri Apr 11, 2025 4:04 pm

god shammgod wrote:pj out here calling the team soft now....sad


They just out-toughed us. They did. The whole fourth quarter,” said PJ Tucker, the veteran who received rotation minutes for the first time this season. “We kept it close but they just out-toughed us. That’s something we got to address. Obviously, not having OG [Anunoby], not having Josh [Hart], getting those guys back will help a lot.

“I just feel like down in the trenches like that in the playoffs this year, they’re not calling nothing. They’re letting a lot of stuff go right now and I like it. The refs are letting a lot of stuff go both ways. With that happening, guys got to play differently. We got to play different. We got to toughen up. It’s more physical. We got to toughen up.


https://nypost.com/2025/04/10/sports/knicks-fail-to-lock-up-no-3-seed-in-loss-to-pesky-pistons/?utm_campaign=iphone_nyp&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social

there's a white boy summer factor to brunson & co that we as a community have been avoiding
spree2kawhi
RealGM
Posts: 12,610
And1: 5,742
Joined: Mar 01, 2005

Re: PG Knicks/Pistons 

Post#214 » by spree2kawhi » Fri Apr 11, 2025 4:08 pm

rajajackal wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:
rajajackal wrote:also, kat was doing things like blocking out for mitch. he may suck at defense, but he puts in a more consistent effort than randle. having those two 7 footers down low is a totally different presence than mitch/randle gave us. i hoped kat at c would suffice, but i'm all in on the twin towers at this point

Yeah idk about KAT giving effort. Too many times he is ball watching and does the laziest close outs ever. Thats why he’s literally graded at the bottom of centers on defense on metrics. We never had that problem before.

like i said, he sucks (feet and awareness) but he does give effort. that's why he makes so many stupid defensive fouls. if i didn't compare the effort level to randle's you would have let it rock :lol: but i'm saying if your starting PF is gonna suck at defense (whether due to ability like kat or due to feeling exempt from it like randle) him being 7 ft down low just makes mitch's job much easier than 6'9 does

Towns isn’t worse than Randle defensively.
User avatar
god shammgod
RealGM
Posts: 138,633
And1: 137,507
Joined: Feb 18, 2006

Re: PG Knicks/Pistons 

Post#215 » by god shammgod » Fri Apr 11, 2025 4:12 pm

spree2kawhi wrote:
rajajackal wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:Yeah idk about KAT giving effort. Too many times he is ball watching and does the laziest close outs ever. Thats why he’s literally graded at the bottom of centers on defense on metrics. We never had that problem before.

like i said, he sucks (feet and awareness) but he does give effort. that's why he makes so many stupid defensive fouls. if i didn't compare the effort level to randle's you would have let it rock :lol: but i'm saying if your starting PF is gonna suck at defense (whether due to ability like kat or due to feeling exempt from it like randle) him being 7 ft down low just makes mitch's job much easier than 6'9 does

Towns isn’t worse than Randle defensively.


because he plays center he is
User avatar
Guano
RealGM
Posts: 39,400
And1: 66,651
Joined: Dec 16, 2010
Location: any port

Re: PG Knicks/Pistons 

Post#216 » by Guano » Fri Apr 11, 2025 4:12 pm

god shammgod wrote:
Guano wrote:


Rightfully so - relying on gramps to be the inforcer is embarrassing in of itself


everybody wondered why he was here. now you know. :lol:


It's elder abuse. Sending out an old man to provide toughness. It's so shameful it's comedic.
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
User avatar
TheGreenArrow
RealGM
Posts: 27,742
And1: 43,313
Joined: Sep 13, 2017

Re: PG Knicks/Pistons 

Post#217 » by TheGreenArrow » Fri Apr 11, 2025 4:12 pm

god shammgod wrote:pj out here calling the team soft now....sad


They just out-toughed us. They did. The whole fourth quarter,” said PJ Tucker, the veteran who received rotation minutes for the first time this season. “We kept it close but they just out-toughed us. That’s something we got to address. Obviously, not having OG [Anunoby], not having Josh [Hart], getting those guys back will help a lot.

“I just feel like down in the trenches like that in the playoffs this year, they’re not calling nothing. They’re letting a lot of stuff go right now and I like it. The refs are letting a lot of stuff go both ways. With that happening, guys got to play differently. We got to play different. We got to toughen up. It’s more physical. We got to toughen up.


https://nypost.com/2025/04/10/sports/knicks-fail-to-lock-up-no-3-seed-in-loss-to-pesky-pistons/?utm_campaign=iphone_nyp&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social


I’m not expecting anything from this team this postseason!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Changes need to be made win or lose!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Either fire thibs or change up the core players on the team!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Cant just run it back next season!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
User avatar
god shammgod
RealGM
Posts: 138,633
And1: 137,507
Joined: Feb 18, 2006

Re: PG Knicks/Pistons 

Post#218 » by god shammgod » Fri Apr 11, 2025 4:14 pm

Guano wrote:
god shammgod wrote:
Guano wrote:
Rightfully so - relying on gramps to be the inforcer is embarrassing in of itself


everybody wondered why he was here. now you know. :lol:


It's elder abuse. Sending out an old man to provide toughness. It's so shameful it's comedic.


it's like if we had beef with another forum on here and sent wingo to deal with it :lol:
User avatar
god shammgod
RealGM
Posts: 138,633
And1: 137,507
Joined: Feb 18, 2006

Re: PG Knicks/Pistons 

Post#219 » by god shammgod » Fri Apr 11, 2025 4:16 pm

TheGreenArrow wrote:
god shammgod wrote:pj out here calling the team soft now....sad


They just out-toughed us. They did. The whole fourth quarter,” said PJ Tucker, the veteran who received rotation minutes for the first time this season. “We kept it close but they just out-toughed us. That’s something we got to address. Obviously, not having OG [Anunoby], not having Josh [Hart], getting those guys back will help a lot.

“I just feel like down in the trenches like that in the playoffs this year, they’re not calling nothing. They’re letting a lot of stuff go right now and I like it. The refs are letting a lot of stuff go both ways. With that happening, guys got to play differently. We got to play different. We got to toughen up. It’s more physical. We got to toughen up.


https://nypost.com/2025/04/10/sports/knicks-fail-to-lock-up-no-3-seed-in-loss-to-pesky-pistons/?utm_campaign=iphone_nyp&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social


I’m not expecting anything from this team this postseason!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Changes need to be made win or lose!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Either fire thibs or change up the core players on the team!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Cant just run it back next season!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


can you blame thibs for the team lacking toughness this year though ? when has a thibs team ever been soft ? it's always been the opposite in his career
User avatar
prophet_of_rage
RealGM
Posts: 18,198
And1: 7,415
Joined: Jan 06, 2005

Re: PG Knicks/Pistons 

Post#220 » by prophet_of_rage » Fri Apr 11, 2025 4:17 pm

JayTWill wrote:
prophet_of_rage wrote:
JayTWill wrote:
But Thibs wouldn't put Hart on Cade. Mikal guarded Cade most of the time this year. Hart spent most of the last Pistons game guarding a limited offensive threat in Ausur Thompson and other off-ball players. Thibs tries to hide Hart off the ball defensively as much as possible. He could have attempted the same thing with Deuce this game but he chose not to.

Every time Cade got off the bench, Deuce got off the bench. That is the role Mikal has had much of the year. Thibs would never put Hart in that position. Cade would have had a length and also a quickness advantage over Hart too.
You can't hide Deuce and Brunson. Cade was cooking evwrybody down low. And then whoever was left had to deal with Harris 6'8 and Thomson 6'6. With 6'6 Beasley coming in.

Sent from my SM-S9080 using RealGM mobile app


Cade went to work on McBride last night. Tatum went to work on Mikal the game before. Booker went to work on OG the game before that. What you won't see is a player going to work on Hart or Brunson very often because Thibs tries to hide them as much as possible off ball although it does feel like he has taken some of the defensive responsibility off of Mikal in the last month or so which may be part of the reason we saw Deuce on Cade all game instead of Mikal. If Thibs did put Hart on Cade, Tatum or Booker I have a strong feeling they would have went to work on him too.

I'm not a fan of undersized backcourts and was one of the few people that thought Grimes should have been placed back in the starting lineup in last January in place of DDV since I thought Grimes was a much better defensive backcourt pairing with Brunson and DDV offense and experience could have been used on the bench. I still wanted a bigger, stronger more versatile defender to pair with Brunson. Deuce is far from my ideal backcourt pairing with Brunson but Hart isn't either. He has plenty of his own defensive issues this year.

https://www.pbpstats.com/wowy-combos/nba?TeamId=1610612752&Season=2024-25&SeasonType=Regular%2BSeason&PlayerIds=1628404&OnlyCommonGames=true

https://www.pbpstats.com/wowy-combos/nba?TeamId=1610612752&Season=2024-25&SeasonType=Regular%2BSeason&PlayerIds=1628973,1630540,1628404&OnlyCommonGames=true

There is no indication that Hart is better defensively for the team especially when paired with Brunson. Hart is stronger but incredibly undersized also with other defensive limitations.
I'm afraid I have quite no idea what you are arguing. My position is simply Deuce is too small to be paired in the backcoirt with Brunson.

Is it your position that the Knicka backcourt players are all small and defensively poor?

Sent from my SM-S9080 using RealGM mobile app

Return to New York Knicks