Hal14 wrote:playa-hater wrote:Hal14 wrote:Ok Smart2Nesmith..your guy Raynaud is growing on me as a potential C's target.
I think we need a big. And we know the C's prefer shooters.
Raynaud has solid shooting indicators. 6.6 3PA/30 mins which is a very high number for a big. 77% FT this season and 34% from 3.
Kind of a funky looking shot, how he brings the ball back behind himself like that and then shoots it, but it seems to work for him..some of the shots I've seen he still manages to catch and shoot it fairly quickly. And other guys (like Bird) shot it in a similar way by bringing the ball back and then shooting it..
He plays hard, seems to have good feel. And I've mentioned usage % as a good indicator. Raynaud had a 31% usage which is VERY high for a big.
He checks a lot of boxes. And is likely to go in the 2nd round..possibly late in the 1st.
We gotta at least bring him in for a workout. The more I watch him play..man, he could really learn some stuff from KP..
He'll be 22.2 on draft day. So that means he's a little older, less of a development project..more of a ready to contribute guy which are guys who seem to work out better for us (Pritchard, Hauser, Scheierman)
Trade down, snag Raynaud with like the 35th pick and call it a day.
And what is your take on defense etc.. and what about vertical spacing? Smart2Nesmith or Hal14?? or anyone who has seen him?
As for where he may be drafted, very hard to say. If he impresses teams at workouts or does bad, would it really surprise anyone that he may go late teens or even late 2nd rd??
Right now, I am all about a good Bigman draft. preferably nice skill versatility with reasonable defense of course.
Decent defense. Not elite but not terrible.
Same with the vertical spacing.
The sell w/ Raynaud is being a 7'1" big who can shoot, pass and put the ball on the floor. And at age 22, he's more plug and play, less of a development project. He's got good toughness, plays hard, has good basketball IQ.
A guy like that in the late 1st/early 2nd round could turn out to be good value.
I think he might a little underrated as a roll man. He just doesn't get a ton of opportunity to showcase it. Obviously when you are the number one offensive option, there just aren't going a lot of time when you get a free roll to the rim. But if you give him a lane he can get up there:
The defense isn't amazing but I can't see a guy as big and as smart(*) as he is not eventually figuring it out (*before going to Stanford he graduated from one of the top 2 most academically demanding high schools in France).














