ImageImageImageImageImage

2025 Draft Thread

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

User avatar
SUPERBALLMAN
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,549
And1: 1,278
Joined: Aug 08, 2006
     

Re: 2025 Draft Thread 

Post#1761 » by SUPERBALLMAN » Thu Apr 17, 2025 9:44 pm

dckingsfan wrote:
The Consiglieri wrote:Hugely disappointing if it happens. Currently Dallas is +222, so for those of you convinced Dallas should win, it presents a prime betting opportunity. They aren't heavy underdogs, but they are clear underdogs in the Vegas markets (+6.5 last time I checked, -110). But if you think they'll win, you could play both sides, or just go ML. Either way, if we get heartbreak, at least you can win some money.

Ja is the variable. If he can play the entire game - that is one thing. If not, quite another.

The trio of our guy Gafford, Lively and AD will dominate the big guy game. Ja would dominate that part of the game. No Ja and no win, IMO.




If we lose the Memphis pick, I suspect Dawkins will work to add another pick via trade. With Poole & Kispert, the 2nds the Memphis pick converts to, the late '26 1st we got from Philly, our 2nd rounder this year (40) as potentially moveable assets.


With that said, Thiero is a player I'd love to get later in the 1st...

"I love it when a plan comes together" - Colonel John "Hannibal" Smith
The Consiglieri
Veteran
Posts: 2,823
And1: 1,013
Joined: May 09, 2007

Re: 2025 Draft Thread 

Post#1762 » by The Consiglieri » Thu Apr 17, 2025 9:47 pm

Kanyewest wrote:
The Consiglieri wrote:Why do you think the tanking effort will be smaller? The sense I get is that the '26 class is viewed as more talented (at least 1-3) than '25 is. I think the Suns will probably either tank from the jump, or start after the deadline. I'm not sure what Milwaukee or Philly would do, but I'd suspect both will try to compete, at least through the winter trade deadline, but the core group of horror show teams remains: Utah, Washington, Charlotte, not really sure what will happen with Brooklyn and Toronto.

But man, you have Dybantsa, and Peterson vying for 1.01, you've got Boozer, and then you have some dude named Ament whose apparently exploded up the rankings since winter '23-'24 and may make it a 4 player class.

I don't know, it's hard for me to see any of the above teams fighting hard to miss out on that group, especially if they end up on the outside looking in, in terms of the big 2 of this class. Tanking, admittedly, may be the wrong word for what I think I could see, maybe more jokeying for development of kids while keeping the losses piling up is a better way of saying it. I don't think any of those teams save Philly, Phoenix, and Milwaukee would be sad about sitting bottom 3 in losses in April of '26.

Btw, thanks for the win breakdown, I had no idea it was that scale of disparity, kind of opposite side of the coin of us rarely losing in close fashion, kind of makes more sense as a whole that typically we got pounded, and the rare times we didnt were nearly uniformally playing tanking/outright bad teams.


The Suns have no incentive to tank since they don't control their pick until 2032.


When I talk about the Sun's tanking, I'm not talking about them trying to suck, I'm talking about them deciding to trade booker, and Durant because they aren't contending, are only getting worse, and have to get something for them if they want to avoid a total collapse inside that law of diminishing returns. By trading those guys, they are tanking indirectly, but also trying to recoup assets, and if they decide the assets to recoup are pick swaps, or future firsts from bad teams or likely to be bad teams, they would I think, do that, at some point, I just do not know when.

Phoenix is not going to be getting any better in a general sense, just older. Do they sell this summer or this winter, or just slowly decline?

Trend line is 45-49-36, and players are going to eventually be 3 years older than they were in that 45 win season of '22-'23. I don't know how they're gonna play it. We, for instance, lived in denial from January 2019 until June '22 when Beal finally pulled the rug out. Will they act preemptively, or go down with the sinking ship like we did? They don't own their own picks, that's true, but their assets are declining in value, and WILL NOT increase in value over the coming years. Do they ride the ship slowly into the ground and blow apart, or do they throw off their assets for the best return? That's the question....I'm not saying they will tank deliberately, but honestly, whats the difference between tanking deliberately, and them trading Durant and Booker for futures? I can't see any. I could see it if they tried a lateral trade for younger, in prime say 24-27 year old vets, that would be different and might not cause a tanking effect, but generally historically speaking, unless you're the Lakers, or Miami, when you age out, you age out, and that's a wrap, and the Sun's are aging out, and have to make these trades, or just suck, suck even worse, and then totally suck. Something's gonna happen, we just don't know when or what.
The Consiglieri
Veteran
Posts: 2,823
And1: 1,013
Joined: May 09, 2007

Re: 2025 Draft Thread 

Post#1763 » by The Consiglieri » Thu Apr 17, 2025 9:52 pm

J-Ves wrote:
The Consiglieri wrote:Hugely disappointing if it happens. Currently Dallas is +222, so for those of you convinced Dallas should win, it presents a prime betting opportunity. They aren't heavy underdogs, but they are clear underdogs in the Vegas markets (+6.5 last time I checked, -110). But if you think they'll win, you could play both sides, or just go ML. Either way, if we get heartbreak, at least you can win some money.

Might drop $100 on Dallas to hedge my sadness. If we lose that pick I’ll be beside myself as Buckhantz used to say


It's what I've always done, it's my only stupid form of betting, but its also logical. If you are going to be crushed by a result, and can at least have an avenue to take advantage of such fore knowlege, why not do it? Like if there are betting odds on which teams will get screwed in the lottery, why not try to double your money by betting on the Wizards to land at 5 or 6, at least in a worst case scenario you have money in your pocket. I get that some people say that will motivate you to desire a crappy result, but it's not really true, what you want is the good pick, what you can tolerate is if things go south, at least you get some misery money. I take that every time.

In this context its quite simple, we are getting screwed royally if Dallas wins, at this point I'll note that the odds have moved towards Dallas, it's now +200 on some sites. Might as well get paid. This is fandom, it's not being a financial sucker, betting should always be business, not homerism.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,124
And1: 22,552
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: 2025 Draft Thread 

Post#1764 » by nate33 » Thu Apr 17, 2025 9:54 pm

The Consiglieri wrote:
Kanyewest wrote:
The Consiglieri wrote:Why do you think the tanking effort will be smaller? The sense I get is that the '26 class is viewed as more talented (at least 1-3) than '25 is. I think the Suns will probably either tank from the jump, or start after the deadline. I'm not sure what Milwaukee or Philly would do, but I'd suspect both will try to compete, at least through the winter trade deadline, but the core group of horror show teams remains: Utah, Washington, Charlotte, not really sure what will happen with Brooklyn and Toronto.

But man, you have Dybantsa, and Peterson vying for 1.01, you've got Boozer, and then you have some dude named Ament whose apparently exploded up the rankings since winter '23-'24 and may make it a 4 player class.

I don't know, it's hard for me to see any of the above teams fighting hard to miss out on that group, especially if they end up on the outside looking in, in terms of the big 2 of this class. Tanking, admittedly, may be the wrong word for what I think I could see, maybe more jokeying for development of kids while keeping the losses piling up is a better way of saying it. I don't think any of those teams save Philly, Phoenix, and Milwaukee would be sad about sitting bottom 3 in losses in April of '26.

Btw, thanks for the win breakdown, I had no idea it was that scale of disparity, kind of opposite side of the coin of us rarely losing in close fashion, kind of makes more sense as a whole that typically we got pounded, and the rare times we didnt were nearly uniformally playing tanking/outright bad teams.


The Suns have no incentive to tank since they don't control their pick until 2032.


When I talk about the Sun's tanking, I'm not talking about them trying to suck, I'm talking about them deciding to trade booker, and Durant because they aren't contending, are only getting worse, and have to get something for them if they want to avoid a total collapse inside that law of diminishing returns. By trading those guys, they are tanking indirectly, but also trying to recoup assets, and if they decide the assets to recoup are pick swaps, or future firsts from bad teams or likely to be bad teams, they would I think, do that, at some point, I just do not know when.

Phoenix is not going to be getting any better in a general sense, just older. Do they sell this summer or this winter, or just slowly decline?

Trend line is 45-49-36, and players are going to eventually be 3 years older than they were in that 45 win season of '22-'23. I don't know how they're gonna play it. We, for instance, lived in denial from January 2019 until June '22 when Beal finally pulled the rug out. Will they act preemptively, or go down with the sinking ship like we did? They don't own their own picks, that's true, but their assets are declining in value, and WILL NOT increase in value over the coming years. Do they ride the ship slowly into the ground and blow apart, or do they throw off their assets for the best return? That's the question....I'm not saying they will tank deliberately, but honestly, whats the difference between tanking deliberately, and them trading Durant and Booker for futures? I can't see any. I could see it if they tried a lateral trade for younger, in prime say 24-27 year old vets, that would be different and might not cause a tanking effect, but generally historically speaking, unless you're the Lakers, or Miami, when you age out, you age out, and that's a wrap, and the Sun's are aging out, and have to make these trades, or just suck, suck even worse, and then totally suck. Something's gonna happen, we just don't know when or what.

A team in their situation doesn't trade away current talent for picks. What they would try to do is trade an older player for a younger player and try to at least remain competitive enough to fill seats. So they will likely trade Durant, but they will be looking to get back a decent younger player(s). Something like Durant to Houston for Jabari Smith and Cam Whitmore would be the type of deal to make. Although a lot of that is complicated by their 2nd Apron status.

What I'm saying is that Phoenix may be bad just because they can't control their decline, but they won't be awful because being awful does NOTHING for them except lose fan support.
The Consiglieri
Veteran
Posts: 2,823
And1: 1,013
Joined: May 09, 2007

Re: 2025 Draft Thread 

Post#1765 » by The Consiglieri » Thu Apr 17, 2025 9:54 pm

Jay81 wrote:we have to tank next year because if we lose our pick to the knicks, we also lose our pick sway from Pheonix. its a no brainer to have to tank

We will. Even with Flagg I don't think it would matter much, we were the worst team by a considerable stretch this year, Utah record or not, by really any reasonable measure. I don't think Flagg is likely to turn us into a 27-32 win team. More likely we actaully win 21-25 if we land Flagg and we have to sweat it a bit, but no more than that.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,124
And1: 22,552
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: 2025 Draft Thread 

Post#1766 » by nate33 » Thu Apr 17, 2025 10:01 pm

The Consiglieri wrote:
Jay81 wrote:we have to tank next year because if we lose our pick to the knicks, we also lose our pick sway from Pheonix. its a no brainer to have to tank

We will. Even with Flagg I don't think it would matter much, we were the worst team by a considerable stretch this year, Utah record or not, by really any reasonable measure. I don't think Flagg is likely to turn us into a 27-32 win team. More likely we actaully win 21-25 if we land Flagg and we have to sweat it a bit, but no more than that.

All true. But Jay81's point is still valid. Falling to 9th worst and losing the 2026 pick isn't just bad because we miss out on the 17.3% lotto odds of landing a top 4 pick. We would also miss out on the opportunity to swap with Phoenix if Phoenix happens to land a top 4 pick.

If we assume that Phoenix is, say, the 8th-worst team, we would be missing out on their 26.2% odds of landing a top 4 pick in addition to our 17.3% odds. It would be like missing out on a 43.5% chance at a top 4 pick. It would feel like being the 5th worst team in the league but not even getting a pick to show for it.
The Consiglieri
Veteran
Posts: 2,823
And1: 1,013
Joined: May 09, 2007

Re: 2025 Draft Thread 

Post#1767 » by The Consiglieri » Thu Apr 17, 2025 10:03 pm

nate33 wrote:
The Consiglieri wrote:
Kanyewest wrote:
The Suns have no incentive to tank since they don't control their pick until 2032.


When I talk about the Sun's tanking, I'm not talking about them trying to suck, I'm talking about them deciding to trade booker, and Durant because they aren't contending, are only getting worse, and have to get something for them if they want to avoid a total collapse inside that law of diminishing returns. By trading those guys, they are tanking indirectly, but also trying to recoup assets, and if they decide the assets to recoup are pick swaps, or future firsts from bad teams or likely to be bad teams, they would I think, do that, at some point, I just do not know when.

Phoenix is not going to be getting any better in a general sense, just older. Do they sell this summer or this winter, or just slowly decline?

Trend line is 45-49-36, and players are going to eventually be 3 years older than they were in that 45 win season of '22-'23. I don't know how they're gonna play it. We, for instance, lived in denial from January 2019 until June '22 when Beal finally pulled the rug out. Will they act preemptively, or go down with the sinking ship like we did? They don't own their own picks, that's true, but their assets are declining in value, and WILL NOT increase in value over the coming years. Do they ride the ship slowly into the ground and blow apart, or do they throw off their assets for the best return? That's the question....I'm not saying they will tank deliberately, but honestly, whats the difference between tanking deliberately, and them trading Durant and Booker for futures? I can't see any. I could see it if they tried a lateral trade for younger, in prime say 24-27 year old vets, that would be different and might not cause a tanking effect, but generally historically speaking, unless you're the Lakers, or Miami, when you age out, you age out, and that's a wrap, and the Sun's are aging out, and have to make these trades, or just suck, suck even worse, and then totally suck. Something's gonna happen, we just don't know when or what.

A team in their situation doesn't trade away current talent for picks. What they would try to do is trade an older player for a younger player and try to at least remain competitive enough to fill seats. So they will likely trade Durant, but they will be looking to get back a decent younger player(s). Something like Durant to Houston for Jabari Smith and Cam Whitmore would be the type of deal to make. Although a lot of that is complicated by their 2nd Apron status.

What I'm saying is that Phoenix may be bad just because they can't control their decline, but they won't be awful because being awful does NOTHING for them except lose fan support.


I get your reasoning, i just don't know if such a trade (which I also think is distinctly possible, indeed probable, especially if they're sane) really makes much of a difference. If I'm hired on to clean up the mess they made, that is the kind of trades I'd put together, but I'd probably pursue trades to create a kind of golden loom scenario where I flip attractive young assets acquired for more picks and more young players kind of like a reverse Deni trade, where I'm moving Booker for a Deni in '25 level guy and a 1st kind of thing and Durant for some talent who hits in the 7th-12th zone, isn't a star, and flip him and on and on, because none of the roads they can pursue will go in a positive direction long term other than piling up picks from soon to be crappy teams in reverse. That's the best you can do. You probably end up giving great picks up over and over to teams you owe swaps to and direct pick transactions for years, but if the picks acquired are worthwhile, it may give you the ammo eventually to pile up an actual build indirectly.

Sticking with the guys is a non-starter long term.

Trading laterally is largely a non-starter unless you get genuine mystery pick bags back.

For me personally, I'd eat the ---- show disaster that was '25-31 or whatever, and just working on golden looming mystery first opportunities through perpetually flipping.

I get that owners and fans might hate this, but every other move left is a move to 30-40 win irrelevance in an absolutely loaded conference for a decade, at least the mystery loom option presents the possibility of a 1 in 20 kind of miracle, the just trying to stay relevant angle just leaves them totally screwed far past 2032. I will totally say so, and I think a lot of us said it even last year, that what the Suns had done was in many ways build a far worse situation that anything we've been in the past four decades. We've had very little hope, but there were always distant possiblities with lotto access to '92-'96, and '10-'13 and '18-'25 or whatever, it didn't work out, so far, but there was at least a chance. The Suns literally are like the Nets were circa 2013, just totally screwed for a decade running or nearly so, there are no outs other than breaking it up.

I think they will end up tanking indirectly because of the moves made, if they're smart anyway that's what they'll do, and take all the bad press, if they're stupid, they'll keep doing lateral moves to tread 30-40 win water for no apparent reason, same as the idiot Mavs.
User avatar
SUPERBALLMAN
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,549
And1: 1,278
Joined: Aug 08, 2006
     

Re: 2025 Draft Thread 

Post#1768 » by SUPERBALLMAN » Thu Apr 17, 2025 10:03 pm

Good stuff here from Dawkins!


"I love it when a plan comes together" - Colonel John "Hannibal" Smith
The Consiglieri
Veteran
Posts: 2,823
And1: 1,013
Joined: May 09, 2007

Re: 2025 Draft Thread 

Post#1769 » by The Consiglieri » Thu Apr 17, 2025 10:08 pm

nate33 wrote:
The Consiglieri wrote:
Jay81 wrote:we have to tank next year because if we lose our pick to the knicks, we also lose our pick sway from Pheonix. its a no brainer to have to tank

We will. Even with Flagg I don't think it would matter much, we were the worst team by a considerable stretch this year, Utah record or not, by really any reasonable measure. I don't think Flagg is likely to turn us into a 27-32 win team. More likely we actaully win 21-25 if we land Flagg and we have to sweat it a bit, but no more than that.

All true. But Jay81's point is still valid. Falling to 9th worst and losing the 2026 pick isn't just bad because we miss out on the 17.3% lotto odds of landing a top 4 pick. We would also miss out on the opportunity to swap with Phoenix if Phoenix happens to land a top 4 pick.

If we assume that Phoenix is, say, the 8th-worst team, we would be missing out on their 26.2% odds of landing a top 4 pick in addition to our 17.3% odds. It would be like missing out on a 43.5% chance at a top 4 pick. It would feel like being the 5th worst team in the league but not even getting a pick to show for it.


I am curious and maybe a little crazy. Would the NBA just rip our pick, if we violated all of their subtle bull---- rules about tanking? Would they just take our first away if we were like 20-40 at the start of March, and played our best players like 10 minutes a night and rolled our bench out primarily? Do they have the power to do that, or is it just fines?

Because if I'm the owner, and it's just fines, I full on 100% don't give a ----, I'd start scalpers outside before I'd play our best guys 30 mins a night in such a scenario.

But the league does appear to have all manner of bull---- power in forcing teams to not deliberately shrink minutes over and over, theathletic seemed to imply that in their Utah-Wizards story from a month ago. I found/find such power, totally and completely unacceptable and absolutely ridiculous. Anyway, I would absolutely flout the rules 1000% as long as it didn't harm my ability to lock in a lottery spot.
User avatar
SUPERBALLMAN
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,549
And1: 1,278
Joined: Aug 08, 2006
     

Re: 2025 Draft Thread 

Post#1770 » by SUPERBALLMAN » Fri Apr 18, 2025 12:29 am

No Ceilings just posted new Mock Draft!


"I love it when a plan comes together" - Colonel John "Hannibal" Smith
AFM
RealGM
Posts: 12,438
And1: 8,659
Joined: May 25, 2012
   

Re: 2025 Draft Thread 

Post#1771 » by AFM » Fri Apr 18, 2025 12:35 am

Did Austin Rivers really say that? Dude can suck my doodool.
User avatar
SUPERBALLMAN
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,549
And1: 1,278
Joined: Aug 08, 2006
     

Re: 2025 Draft Thread 

Post#1772 » by SUPERBALLMAN » Fri Apr 18, 2025 12:41 am

I might be jumping the gun, but I'm going to say it right now, if the Wizards fall out of the top 3 the player I would take is Carter Bryant.


https://tucson.com/sports/arizonawildcats/basketball/article_e44cfd94-2bf2-4c54-ba56-0539bb1affe1.html


"I love it when a plan comes together" - Colonel John "Hannibal" Smith
User avatar
SUPERBALLMAN
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,549
And1: 1,278
Joined: Aug 08, 2006
     

Re: 2025 Draft Thread 

Post#1773 » by SUPERBALLMAN » Fri Apr 18, 2025 12:57 am

AFM wrote:Did Austin Rivers really say that? Dude can suck my doodool.



"I love it when a plan comes together" - Colonel John "Hannibal" Smith
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 54,548
And1: 10,312
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: 2025 Draft Thread 

Post#1774 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Fri Apr 18, 2025 1:18 am

AFM wrote:Would you trade #1 for #2 and Queen?
Yes.
Tre Johnson is the future of the Wizards.
User avatar
Kanyewest
RealGM
Posts: 10,349
And1: 2,721
Joined: Jul 05, 2004

Re: 2025 Draft Thread 

Post#1775 » by Kanyewest » Fri Apr 18, 2025 1:49 am

The Consiglieri wrote:
Kanyewest wrote:
The Consiglieri wrote:Why do you think the tanking effort will be smaller? The sense I get is that the '26 class is viewed as more talented (at least 1-3) than '25 is. I think the Suns will probably either tank from the jump, or start after the deadline. I'm not sure what Milwaukee or Philly would do, but I'd suspect both will try to compete, at least through the winter trade deadline, but the core group of horror show teams remains: Utah, Washington, Charlotte, not really sure what will happen with Brooklyn and Toronto.

But man, you have Dybantsa, and Peterson vying for 1.01, you've got Boozer, and then you have some dude named Ament whose apparently exploded up the rankings since winter '23-'24 and may make it a 4 player class.

I don't know, it's hard for me to see any of the above teams fighting hard to miss out on that group, especially if they end up on the outside looking in, in terms of the big 2 of this class. Tanking, admittedly, may be the wrong word for what I think I could see, maybe more jokeying for development of kids while keeping the losses piling up is a better way of saying it. I don't think any of those teams save Philly, Phoenix, and Milwaukee would be sad about sitting bottom 3 in losses in April of '26.

Btw, thanks for the win breakdown, I had no idea it was that scale of disparity, kind of opposite side of the coin of us rarely losing in close fashion, kind of makes more sense as a whole that typically we got pounded, and the rare times we didnt were nearly uniformally playing tanking/outright bad teams.


The Suns have no incentive to tank since they don't control their pick until 2032.


When I talk about the Sun's tanking, I'm not talking about them trying to suck, I'm talking about them deciding to trade booker, and Durant because they aren't contending, are only getting worse, and have to get something for them if they want to avoid a total collapse inside that law of diminishing returns. By trading those guys, they are tanking indirectly, but also trying to recoup assets, and if they decide the assets to recoup are pick swaps, or future firsts from bad teams or likely to be bad teams, they would I think, do that, at some point, I just do not know when.

Phoenix is not going to be getting any better in a general sense, just older. Do they sell this summer or this winter, or just slowly decline?

Trend line is 45-49-36, and players are going to eventually be 3 years older than they were in that 45 win season of '22-'23. I don't know how they're gonna play it. We, for instance, lived in denial from January 2019 until June '22 when Beal finally pulled the rug out. Will they act preemptively, or go down with the sinking ship like we did? They don't own their own picks, that's true, but their assets are declining in value, and WILL NOT increase in value over the coming years. Do they ride the ship slowly into the ground and blow apart, or do they throw off their assets for the best return? That's the question....I'm not saying they will tank deliberately, but honestly, whats the difference between tanking deliberately, and them trading Durant and Booker for futures? I can't see any. I could see it if they tried a lateral trade for younger, in prime say 24-27 year old vets, that would be different and might not cause a tanking effect, but generally historically speaking, unless you're the Lakers, or Miami, when you age out, you age out, and that's a wrap, and the Sun's are aging out, and have to make these trades, or just suck, suck even worse, and then totally suck. Something's gonna happen, we just don't know when or what.


It seems like the Suns are still in denial but we will see. They probably still see Booker as a primary piece to build around (I don't but people around the league seems to overrate him). Yes they could enter the tanking sweepstakes if they somehow manage to trade Durant to the Rockets who control their picks. The Rockets could be incentivized to see if the Suns fall apart given that they would have to give up a large part of their core to get Durant. It will be interesting to see. Still, it seems less likely that the Suns get below 30 wins next season although maybe they could pivot.
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,543
And1: 1,988
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: 2025 Draft Thread 

Post#1776 » by gambitx777 » Fri Apr 18, 2025 8:49 am

For the record if they fall out of the back 15. They do in fact still owe us something

2025 first round draft pick from Memphis
Memphis' 2025 1st round pick to Washington protected for selections 1-14 in 2025; if this pick falls within its protected range and is therefore not conveyed, then Memphis will instead convey (i) the most favorable of Boston's 2026 2nd round pick, Indiana's 2026 2nd round pick, the L.A. Clippers' 2026 2nd round pick and Miami's 2026 2nd round pick and (ii) Atlanta's 2027 2nd round pick to Washington [Memphis-Sacramento-Washington, 2/6/2025]

Sent from my SM-S926U1 using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,259
And1: 5,031
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: 2025 Draft Thread 

Post#1777 » by tontoz » Fri Apr 18, 2025 11:45 am

Film breakdown of Tre's passing.

"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
User avatar
doclinkin
RealGM
Posts: 15,012
And1: 6,767
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: .wizuds.

Re: 2025 Draft Thread 

Post#1778 » by doclinkin » Fri Apr 18, 2025 1:43 pm

The Consiglieri wrote:I am curious and maybe a little crazy. Would the NBA just rip our pick, if we violated all of their subtle bull---- rules about tanking?


All we know is Adam Silver said the competition committee would talk about rules proposals to discourage tanking.

Last time they did that they came up with the modified odds. Do they expand the lotto odds to the bottom 8? Or if the bottom 4 had 10% each but those after that had better odds? Or the two worst teams get the 4&5 pick? These are all ideas floated by Mike Vorkunov of the Athletic to encourage a dogfight even among the teams at the bottom of the standings.

I wouldn’t hate it if the cellar dwellers had to fight it out. A little late season juice to look forward to. Or a mini tournament among those that missed the playoffs where the best of the worst got bettered odds as a reward. Plus cash incentives for the players to encourage participation. I dunno. The toilet bowl. The stupor bowl.

Owners still have to vote on whatever they come up with. But I get the sense that anything that screws Ted wouldn’t entirely be frowned on.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,124
And1: 22,552
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: 2025 Draft Thread 

Post#1779 » by nate33 » Fri Apr 18, 2025 2:20 pm

doclinkin wrote:
The Consiglieri wrote:I am curious and maybe a little crazy. Would the NBA just rip our pick, if we violated all of their subtle bull---- rules about tanking?


All we know is Adam Silver said the competition committee would talk about rules proposals to discourage tanking.

Last time they did that they came up with the modified odds. Do they expand the lotto odds to the bottom 8? Or if the bottom 4 had 10% each but those after that had better odds? Or the two worst teams get the 4&5 pick? These are all ideas floated by Mike Vorkunov of the Athletic to encourage a dogfight even among the teams at the bottom of the standings.

I wouldn’t hate it if the cellar dwellers had to fight it out. A little late season juice to look forward to. Or a mini tournament among those that missed the playoffs where the best of the worst got bettered odds as a reward. Plus cash incentives for the players to encourage participation. I dunno. The toilet bowl. The stupor bowl.

Owners still have to vote on whatever they come up with. But I get the sense that anything that screws Ted wouldn’t entirely be frowned on.

I hope they don't do anything more on the "tanking issue". I think the situation now is about as good as it gets. Flattening the lotto odds further will make it too hard to rebuild. Very few teams are actively trying to lose games. Some teams, like us, recognize that the playoffs are unlikely so we instead focus on youth development. That's not tanking. That's just logical long-term management of resources. Heck, as a fan, I'd rather pay to watch Bub, Bilal, George and Sarr lose by ten points than pay to watch Brogdon, Kispert, Gill and Holmes lose by 5 points. So it even makes sense from a financial standpoint.

There were a few tanking atrocities this season that were less structural and more situational. Toronto and Philly shamelessly tanked this year, not so much to improve their lottery odds, but to ensure they didn't lose out on a protected pick that they owed in 2025. Maybe they ought to do something about limiting pick protections. Just allow top 4 protection and that's it.

I'll also add that Utah seems to be violating the spirit of competition with their tanking too. I have no problem with them prioritizing the development of youth, but they are squandering Markkanen's prime by forcing him to stay on a tanking team and limiting his minutes so they don't accidentally win. It's been 3 years now for that guy and he has yet to play in a meaningful game for Utah.
The Consiglieri
Veteran
Posts: 2,823
And1: 1,013
Joined: May 09, 2007

Re: 2025 Draft Thread 

Post#1780 » by The Consiglieri » Fri Apr 18, 2025 3:39 pm

Kanyewest wrote:
It seems like the Suns are still in denial but we will see. They probably still see Booker as a primary piece to build around (I don't but people around the league seems to overrate him). Yes they could enter the tanking sweepstakes if they somehow manage to trade Durant to the Rockets who control their picks. The Rockets could be incentivized to see if the Suns fall apart given that they would have to give up a large part of their core to get Durant. It will be interesting to see. Still, it seems less likely that the Suns get below 30 wins next season although maybe they could pivot.


The big problem to me is that:
Durant is 37 when '25-'26 kicks off
Beal is 32 when '25-'26 kicks off (it does seem like they will just end up benching him though (for a good chunk of these last 2 years of his deal)
Booker is 29.


This isn't going up, the most likely scenario is that as is, they fall off from 36 wins to even fewer next year if they simply retain the core, the west is getting better, and they are just getting older.

Whose worse in the West? Utah, New Orleans, and then the maybes, Portland also treading water, while Dallas probably slips too, San Antonio rising, Sacramento I'm not sure.

It's hard to see them doing much more than 28-38 wins, somewhere between 5th and 12th in lottery slotted odds.

The lateral moves talked about for younger players with more upside and more floor risk, or high picks are the only things that really makes sense, but are they going to be stupidly stubborn and just drive it into the ditch or try to make win now trades for vets like Butler (which they tried in February?). Seems like it. In such a scenario I'd see them dropping off to 28-32 wins next year, 34-36 at most.

Return to Washington Wizards