VFX wrote:This roster already has a lot of guys that are 2's that pretend to be 1's
I dont think we need more of those guys combined with the facts:
-KCP is solidly a "2".
-AB isn't a "point guard" 90% of the time.
-Suggs best year statistically was at "2"
If Orlando is actually looking at POINT GUARDS they need to be able to to POINT GUARD things.
I like Fears, but hes going top 10. A lot of his numbers dont WOW me, but he knows how to move the ball and operate a pnr.
Kasparas is great in theory, but Is he a starting nba point guard? Probably not. His A/TO ratio isn't appealing and he's known for passing. How is that good?
Demin has a extremely appealing A/TO at 7.3/3.8, but his shooting numbers are trash. Not interested really, but sounds like a Magician.
I know close to nothing about Traore other than he has good playmaking skills primarily in transition and uses his speed to do anything. Those guys dont last long if they dont have other elite qualities.
Ben Saraf is the opposite. He's a half court playmaker that uses pick and rolls and court vision. Unfortunately he is bad from 3. Another Magician.
Kam Jones and Walter Clayton are the same age as Franz. I'm going with Clayton over Jones because he's a better shooter and even though Kam has a better A/TO ratio by +2. Moving the ball is important, but we already have 3+ guys that only finish at the rim and have a difficult time stretching the floor.
I dont love a lot of the options this year at point guard. They all have glaring weaknesses. I'm more sold on moving the picks and acquiring Clayton later even though he has a limited potential ceiling. I also question if hes even a true point guard or if he's just a small shooting guard because he isnt a facilitator. We already have those guys.
Agree with all of this, except...
-I'd say Suggs ONLY (not just best) good statistical year was last season (as a SG)...he's scored a lot more this year, only 35 games, but far less efficiently.
Even a promising guy like Fears, IF he dropped, is probably years away from contributing as a true PG, and his 3pt shooting and ast/to ratio are very suspect...he's young and might deliver long-term, but I'd much prefer trading for a guy (even if he's got a lower ceiling overall) that could help now. I DO like the idea of grabbing prospects (at any spot) in the second and planting them in Osceola, unless they show out in camp and reveal themselves as undervalued gems. Bottom line, I don't see PGs for us at #16 and anyone at the DEN pick is probably a long-shot that shouldn't preclude us from making a separate deal, IMO.
There are three guys, just on WAS that might be ready to contribute at PG- even though two of them are just rookies...Poole, Bub, and AJJ. Not sure what Brogdon's physical status is...but, if he could play, I can't imagine why they let him expire rather than collect a pick or two for him. I keep coming back to WAS, because they are near the bottom of a rebuild and that's the right place for a team we want to make a deal with.