NoDopeOnSundays wrote:It is that simple, he's turning into the guy in the late stage of his career that can put up numbers but really can't impact winning as much as the numbers make you believe.
It's not a matter of just having winners, it's about having a group of players that are all roughly the same age. For all the complaining about KAT and Mikal, they are 28 and 30, you still have more time to figure things out. If you trade for KD and it turns into the Nets or Suns, you're done, completely done with no avenues out. Never mind the fact he's a free agent after next season.
This movie plays out all the time in the NBA, older star nearing the end that people still think can put a team over the top. For every LeBron & Curry, there's 10 Steve Nashes to the Lakers, or Lillards to the Bucks.
Sorry to keep dragging this on. But I think balance is important here. Teams like the 2011-2013 Lakers did not have balance. It was multiple guys in their twilight years with MDA as HC. On the Knicks, KD would be the only go over 31.
Lillard? There's no real comparison here to KD. Lillard was always an undersized + inefficient scoring guard.
As for extensions, it's likely KD extends prior to the trade.
BTW, I'm saying Knicks should only pursue KD if it means keeping KAT. I'm not advocating for a KAT <> KD swap.
If the criticism is wishful thinking on my part, I totally get that. All my arguments are moot if teams like Rockets, Wolves, and maybe OKC , Spurs, or Warriors make a strong push for KD.