Jeff Van Gully wrote:Buttah304 wrote:If these numbers don’t concern you then I feel as a group RealGM should get a collective lobotomy.
Brunson’s USG% on the year is around 28% and last night it was 39.4% - that represents a 40% increase.
NBA teams AVG time of possession in 24-25 was 14.4 seconds - Brunson himself was at 10.6 seconds in Game 2 in case you are wondering why we are never a hockey assist away from a functional possession. There is no mismatch hunting, transition oops, double screens, stagger screens, pin downs or curl plays. We don’t push the pace off a missed FG or FTA - it’s stuck in the mud.
As far as touches are concerned, Brunson had 104 last night when he was closer to 84 on the season.
In fact, if you look at game 2 as far as who Jalen passed the ball to, Bridges received 38, Hart 32 and KAT only had 12 passes delivered from JB.
This offense is an utter indictment of Thibs and it’s truly the worst coaching I’ve seen him do across 6 years as a Knick HC. He has no clue how to adapt to his player personnel or the opposing HC, he will never be proactive to seek a way to win on the margins. It’s laughable.
dr. buttah, context matters.
it's easy to look at those numbers and not think about why. that usage wasn't the gameplan. the variance you point out inherently says as much. they know we know we should be moving the ball. that's why they forced the ISOs and won.
if you listen to thibs talk, you often hear him agreeing with what posters complain about and trying to get the players to execute it. is it possible he can't? sure. different conversation. but to think a 2X COY doesn't know what you're saying makes me laugh out loud on this forum.
like, "oh snap. user X really thinks they not only 'know ball' more than a lifelong professional... they think said pro doesn't even conceptually know what we're talking about." it's insulting to the coach and readers.
Respectfully, it just sounds like you’re okay with making every excuse in the book for Thibs when we have seen this same movie play out over the course of his career.
We have the right as fans to criticize what we don’t like about the HC. To be clear what I don’t love is the following:
#22 in defense after time out
#16 in offense after time out
#26 in PACE this year and #30 last season
#26 defensive 3PT % and DIFF % this year
#13 in playoff front court touches (with KAT)
#1 in time of possession in playoffs yet we are #13 out of 16 in potential assists
In the words of Ric Flair, “Last year I spent more money on spilt liquor in bars from one side of the world to the other then you made” - with respect to Thibs I will fully acknowledge that he will forget more about basketball then all of us posters will ever learn.
Having said that, just because you are a 2x COTY does not mean that you can’t simultaneously have severe flaws. That you might not actually be a championship level HC in 2025. The lack of creativity in what we run quite literally pops off the screen. He just seems set in his ways.
It’s funny, over the years I have watched countless Spo coached playoff games and I’ve seen Strus, Vincent and Duncan have utterly horrific first halves. That still didn’t stop Spo from specifically running an action/designing a play to free them up in the 3rd/4th to instill confidence in his role players and catch the defense sleeping.
Yes, Payne and Shamet had a bad 3min sub pattern in the 2nd but good coaching isn’t banishing them to the damn underworld after one of them just won you a playoff game.
As a HC your literal job is to know when and where to press the right buttons strategically over the course of a game but Thibs treats it like an/off switch. I just expect better coaching across the board and quite frankly every die hard fan should as well.