GONYK wrote:Wildcat wrote:Worst_to_First wrote:
Agreed. I LOL every time an opposing player attempts to shoot a three over Mitch. Josh is good at extending leads (when we can run a team off the court) but in a dogfight I would trust Mitch more.
Bench needs a player like Hart. That's what championship teams need. The more I think about it, the more pissed I get that Josh isn't taking it upon himself to say, "You know what, Thibs? Put me on the bench. They need me more."
Other than the time he took it upon himself to suggest going back to the bench?Josh Hart suggested Friday night that a move back to the second unit could help him rediscover his do-it-all role, which he claims to presently have “no idea” what it is after starting four of the revamped Knicks’ five preseason games.
If Hart were to shift back to the bench — and there has been no indication from Tom Thibodeau that such a move is under consideration — the Knicks would have a couple of options to replace him in an overhauled starting five that features two new players in Karl-Anthony Towns and Mikal Bridges, along with returning point guard Jalen Brunson and two-way forward OG Anunoby.
https://nypost.com/2024/10/19/sports/knicks-ripe-for-choice-if-lost-josh-hart-lands-on-second-unit/
Josh Hart wrote:“I’m lost. I have no idea,” Hart said. “There’s a couple days before we have until Boston. So whether that’s trying to get a rhythm with that starting unit or we give somebody else a look and my role changes and comes off the bench and go with that unit. So just trying to figure out right now I pretty much have no idea. But we’ll see what happens in Boston (in the season opener Tuesday).”
Does that sound like someone asking to be put on the bench or someone who has no idea what his role is 2 weeks into the season? I'm going with the latter. And speaking out loud and telling Thibs put me on the bench aren't the same.