2025 nfl draft thread

Post #441 » by **Harry Palmer** » Fri Apr 25, 2025 1:11 am

Pattersonca65 wrote:
Harry Palmer wrote:
clyde21 wrote:Membou off the board

Well ****. Okay, trade back time please.

Edit: who is everyone’s lowest ranked ‘I’d be okay with him at 11’ guy? I think for me it’s probably Banks. Actually Banks has risen lately, must be someone lower…eh…maybe Nolan or even Campbell.

The 49ers tried to trade down and Lynch said there is little interest. More teams wanting to trade down than trade up

I know, but I’m giving myself grounds for griping later.

Samurai · Post #442 » by **Samurai** » Fri Apr 25, 2025 1:11 am

Thought the Saints would have gone for a QB; bummer....

CrimsonCrew · Post #443 » by **CrimsonCrew** » Fri Apr 25, 2025 1:12 am

Could still be Simmons. But other than that, got to be DL.

Two months ago I figured we'd be lucky for Banks to be there at 11. Recently, seemed like 11 would be high for him. Shows that OT is just so valued in the league.

RIPskaterdude · Post #444 » by **RIPskaterdude** » Fri Apr 25, 2025 1:12 am

Bears went TE, 49ers on the clock

clyde21 · Post #445 » by **clyde21** » Fri Apr 25, 2025 1:13 am

WOW, Loveland to Chicago

Pattersonca65 · Post #446 » by **Pattersonca65** » Fri Apr 25, 2025 1:13 am

CrimsonCrew wrote:Could still be Simmons. But other than that, got to be DL.

Two months ago I figured we'd be lucky for Banks to be there at 11. Recently, seemed like 11 would be high for him. Shows that OT is just so valued in the league.

Last year oline went fast too. Premium position in the NFL

CrimsonCrew · Post #447 » by **CrimsonCrew** » Fri Apr 25, 2025 1:14 am

Harry Palmer wrote:
Pattersonca65 wrote:
Harry Palmer wrote:

Well ****. Okay, trade back time please.

Edit: who is everyone’s lowest ranked ‘I’d be okay with him at 11’ guy? I think for me it’s probably Banks. Actually Banks has risen lately, must be someone lower…eh…maybe Nolan or even Campbell.

The 49ers tried to trade down and Lynch said there is little interest. More teams wanting to trade down than trade up

I know, but I’m giving myself grounds for griping later.

You can't generally trade back before the draft, unless it's into the top-5 and not for a specific player. Seems unlikely they'll do it, but the market develops now.

RIPskaterdude · Post #448 » by **RIPskaterdude** » Fri Apr 25, 2025 1:14 am

RIPskaterdude wrote:It's gonna be Williams or Nolen

Yep

CrimsonCrew · Post #449 » by **CrimsonCrew** » Fri Apr 25, 2025 1:14 am

How far does Sanders fall?

clyde21 · Post #450 » by **clyde21** » Fri Apr 25, 2025 1:15 am

our pick is already in, that was quick

clyde21 · Post #451 » by **clyde21** » Fri Apr 25, 2025 1:15 am

well, there it is

Spoiler:

CrimsonCrew · Post #452 » by **CrimsonCrew** » Fri Apr 25, 2025 1:15 am

No trade.

clyde21 · Post #453 » by **clyde21** » Fri Apr 25, 2025 1:16 am

I don't hate it, crazy potential if he hits his ceiling.

CrimsonCrew · Post #454 » by **CrimsonCrew** » Fri Apr 25, 2025 1:17 am

Mykel. I'm okay with it. High floor, high ceiling. Hope he blossoms when in a system that will let him pin back his ears.

RIPskaterdude · Post #455 » by **RIPskaterdude** » Fri Apr 25, 2025 1:17 am

CrimsonCrew wrote:No trade.

Too many DL available so no need to trade up to get one

clyde21 · Post #456 » by **clyde21** » Fri Apr 25, 2025 1:21 am

lol ridiculous, our pick has been in for 10 mins but ESPN wants to milk commercials

Pattersonca65 · Post #457 » by **Pattersonca65** » Fri Apr 25, 2025 1:21 am

Why is Mason Graham falling?

clyde21 · Post #458 » by **clyde21** » Fri Apr 25, 2025 1:22 am

oh ffs just announce the pick

clyde21 · Post #459 » by **clyde21** » Fri Apr 25, 2025 1:23 am

Pattersonca65 wrote:Why is Mason Graham falling?

?

Post #460 » by **Harry Palmer** » Fri Apr 25, 2025 1:23 am

Mykel? I’m okay-ish. Was more bullish a few weeks ago, read some less optimistic stuff recently though you never know how much of that is strategic propaganda at this stage. Of the Measurable Edges he’s probably the safest but maybe slightly lower ceiling than the other two.