Hou-Chi

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

pipfan
RealGM
Posts: 12,315
And1: 4,252
Joined: Aug 07, 2010

Hou-Chi 

Post#1 » by pipfan » Fri Apr 25, 2025 5:50 am

These two seem like good trading partners to me
JSmith for the #12?

Houston has too many young guys, and their salary structure will explode soon. This gives them 2 lotto picks to add more young guys who have 4 cheap years coming.

Bulls get bigger, I like Matas at the 3. We have a mostly clear slate for salaries moving forward, so we can extend Giddey and Smith this summer and go with
White/Ayo
Giddey/Ball
Matas/Huerter
Smith/PWill
Vuc (?)/Collins
deep bench of Carter, Phillips, JSmith, Terry
Could deal Vuc too, so our defense is much better. In theory, Vuc would make a great bench center, and Collins could start for defense, and play Smith too at the 4/5
Dez
General Manager
Posts: 7,675
And1: 9,233
Joined: Jul 23, 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
 

Re: Hou-Chi 

Post#2 » by Dez » Fri Apr 25, 2025 9:00 am

Houston can do a lot better than that for Jabari Smith Jr.
Frankie
Junior
Posts: 333
And1: 285
Joined: Oct 25, 2022
 

Re: Hou-Chi 

Post#3 » by Frankie » Fri Apr 25, 2025 10:26 am

Hard pass.
Kiss of Death
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,392
And1: 1,572
Joined: Jun 24, 2022
 

Re: Hou-Chi 

Post#4 » by Kiss of Death » Fri Apr 25, 2025 10:32 am

No from Houston.

They are more likely to trade the #9 pick than they are to trade for the #12.
jayjaysee
King of the Trade Board
Posts: 20,817
And1: 7,789
Joined: Aug 05, 2012

Re: Hou-Chi 

Post#5 » by jayjaysee » Fri Apr 25, 2025 10:49 am

I think Houston and Chicago are good trade partners. But it’s in a world where Chicago is selling, not Houston. Jalen, Ayo, Lonzo..

I don’t think Houston is ready to give up on Jabari unless it’s in a star package. Would take an overpay and I think some teams would pay more than OP.

Houston has 2-3 years before they’re in that tax crunch. They can afford to extend or match on Jabari if they want and see who is worth keeping once Amen’a contract is kicking in.
Godaddycurse
RealGM
Posts: 21,905
And1: 13,843
Joined: Nov 13, 2019
 

Re: Hou-Chi 

Post#6 » by Godaddycurse » Fri Apr 25, 2025 11:06 am

jayjaysee wrote:I think Houston and Chicago are good trade partners. But it’s in a world where Chicago is selling, not Houston. Jalen, Ayo, Lonzo..

I don’t think Houston is ready to give up on Jabari unless it’s in a star package. Would take an overpay and I think some teams would pay more than OP.

Houston has 2-3 years before they’re in that tax crunch. They can afford to extend or match on Jabari if they want and see who is worth keeping once Amen’a contract is kicking in.


Dont see how jabari is worth more than 12 at this point given how stagnant his numbers have been
User avatar
LarsV8
RealGM
Posts: 10,139
And1: 5,444
Joined: Dec 13, 2009
       

Re: Hou-Chi 

Post#7 » by LarsV8 » Fri Apr 25, 2025 12:40 pm

It would take multiple firsts to pry away Jabari Smith.

He is an awesome player and so so young.
Image
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,786
And1: 35,866
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Hou-Chi 

Post#8 » by jbk1234 » Fri Apr 25, 2025 1:00 pm

jayjaysee wrote:I think Houston and Chicago are good trade partners. But it’s in a world where Chicago is selling, not Houston. Jalen, Ayo, Lonzo..

I don’t think Houston is ready to give up on Jabari unless it’s in a star package. Would take an overpay and I think some teams would pay more than OP.

Houston has 2-3 years before they’re in that tax crunch. They can afford to extend or match on Jabari if they want and see who is worth keeping once Amen’a contract is kicking in.


I don't think extending, or matching, on Smith is an easy choice given the fact that Eason will be up after next season and Thompson will be up the following year. Setting aside PPP, which will make trades more difficult, he's one of those guys who you can't just hand a rookie max to and assume he'll have positive value.

I wouldn't extend FVV either. I'd pick up his option.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Frankie
Junior
Posts: 333
And1: 285
Joined: Oct 25, 2022
 

Re: Hou-Chi 

Post#9 » by Frankie » Fri Apr 25, 2025 1:21 pm

jbk1234 wrote:
jayjaysee wrote:I think Houston and Chicago are good trade partners. But it’s in a world where Chicago is selling, not Houston. Jalen, Ayo, Lonzo..

I don’t think Houston is ready to give up on Jabari unless it’s in a star package. Would take an overpay and I think some teams would pay more than OP.

Houston has 2-3 years before they’re in that tax crunch. They can afford to extend or match on Jabari if they want and see who is worth keeping once Amen’a contract is kicking in.


I don't think extending, or matching, on Smith is an easy choice given the fact that Eason will be up after next season and Thompson will be up the following year. Setting aside PPP, which will make trades more difficult, he's one of those guys who you can't just hand a rookie max to and assume he'll have positive value.

I wouldn't extend FVV either. I'd pick up his option.


Neither Eason or Jabari will get the max. Amen might, and even that depends on how he continues to develop the next 2 years.
pipfan
RealGM
Posts: 12,315
And1: 4,252
Joined: Aug 07, 2010

Re: Hou-Chi 

Post#10 » by pipfan » Fri Apr 25, 2025 1:22 pm

jbk1234 wrote:
jayjaysee wrote:I think Houston and Chicago are good trade partners. But it’s in a world where Chicago is selling, not Houston. Jalen, Ayo, Lonzo..

I don’t think Houston is ready to give up on Jabari unless it’s in a star package. Would take an overpay and I think some teams would pay more than OP.

Houston has 2-3 years before they’re in that tax crunch. They can afford to extend or match on Jabari if they want and see who is worth keeping once Amen’a contract is kicking in.


I don't think extending, or matching, on Smith is an easy choice given the fact that Eason will be up after next season and Thompson will be up the following year. Setting aside PPP, which will make trades more difficult, he's one of those guys who you can't just hand a rookie max to and assume he'll have positive value.

I wouldn't extend FVV either. I'd pick up his option.

I figure Hou saves about $8 million (difference in the #12 salary and JSmith next year) and buy years of a cheap deal. Hou has to make tough decisions-this is a move to sell high.

But, maybe they keep him and Chi just stays at 12. Thanks
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,786
And1: 35,866
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Hou-Chi 

Post#11 » by jbk1234 » Fri Apr 25, 2025 1:28 pm

Frankie wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
jayjaysee wrote:I think Houston and Chicago are good trade partners. But it’s in a world where Chicago is selling, not Houston. Jalen, Ayo, Lonzo..

I don’t think Houston is ready to give up on Jabari unless it’s in a star package. Would take an overpay and I think some teams would pay more than OP.

Houston has 2-3 years before they’re in that tax crunch. They can afford to extend or match on Jabari if they want and see who is worth keeping once Amen’a contract is kicking in.


I don't think extending, or matching, on Smith is an easy choice given the fact that Eason will be up after next season and Thompson will be up the following year. Setting aside PPP, which will make trades more difficult, he's one of those guys who you can't just hand a rookie max to and assume he'll have positive value.

I wouldn't extend FVV either. I'd pick up his option.


Neither Eason or Jabari will get the max. Amen might, and even that depends on how he continues to develop the next 2 years.


I agree that neither guy is worth even a rookie max, but we're now at a point where not everything is up to the Rockets. They can't control what Smith is offered by other teams. It's up to him whether to sign what's offered.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Frankie
Junior
Posts: 333
And1: 285
Joined: Oct 25, 2022
 

Re: Hou-Chi 

Post#12 » by Frankie » Fri Apr 25, 2025 1:35 pm

jbk1234 wrote:
Frankie wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
I don't think extending, or matching, on Smith is an easy choice given the fact that Eason will be up after next season and Thompson will be up the following year. Setting aside PPP, which will make trades more difficult, he's one of those guys who you can't just hand a rookie max to and assume he'll have positive value.

I wouldn't extend FVV either. I'd pick up his option.


Neither Eason or Jabari will get the max. Amen might, and even that depends on how he continues to develop the next 2 years.


I agree that neither guy is worth even a rookie max, but we're now at a point where not everything is up to the Rockets. They can't control what Smith is offered by other teams. It's up to him whether to sign what's offered.


That's true, and Jabari in particular lost his starting spot, so there's a decent he could get a better contract as well as the opportunity to be a starter on another team. I'm optimistic we can get him signed to a team friendly deal too, but if he spends all of next season coming off the bench, I could see a world where he wants to test the market.

Eason I think we'll have no problems signing to a team friendly deal. He suits his role on this team so perfectly.
Skybox
RealGM
Posts: 18,354
And1: 8,421
Joined: Jan 21, 2017
 

Re: Hou-Chi 

Post#13 » by Skybox » Fri Apr 25, 2025 3:55 pm

Interesting concept...not sure it's enough for HOU, but Tari's emergence and all of the bills coming due soon makes this really interesting. HOU can be careful with their money by resetting the rookie clock...but I think #12, specifically in this draft isn't enough, IMO...and I do like Jabari for CHI.
User avatar
Tetlak
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,276
And1: 2,355
Joined: Aug 16, 2010

Re: Hou-Chi 

Post#14 » by Tetlak » Fri Apr 25, 2025 4:00 pm

Jabari Smith Jr. is just not that good. Rather go for the unknown.
Astaluego
Starter
Posts: 2,394
And1: 907
Joined: May 02, 2020
   

Re: Hou-Chi 

Post#15 » by Astaluego » Fri Apr 25, 2025 4:08 pm

I think Smith will be part of the trade where Houston gets KD, the Bulls and their pick will be involved in the Zion trade
Old Mike Lorenzo
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,371
And1: 98,216
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: Hou-Chi 

Post#16 » by Texas Chuck » Fri Apr 25, 2025 4:50 pm

Godaddycurse wrote:
jayjaysee wrote:I think Houston and Chicago are good trade partners. But it’s in a world where Chicago is selling, not Houston. Jalen, Ayo, Lonzo..

I don’t think Houston is ready to give up on Jabari unless it’s in a star package. Would take an overpay and I think some teams would pay more than OP.

Houston has 2-3 years before they’re in that tax crunch. They can afford to extend or match on Jabari if they want and see who is worth keeping once Amen’a contract is kicking in.


Dont see how jabari is worth more than 12 at this point given how stagnant his numbers have been


So this is interesting to me. I think godaddy isn't wrong to suggest he hasn't shown what was hoped, is on an expensive rookie deal due to his draft spot and its time already to make an extension decision. I can't imagine he agrees to anything team friendly, so he either gets overpaid or plays out his last year, which could be fine but is never ideal.

So I don't think he's worth more than 12 either. But I don't see Houston punting him for that either. I think there is still too much talent there for that. So I would agree if he's dealt its as part of a package for a better player.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,786
And1: 35,866
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Hou-Chi 

Post#17 » by jbk1234 » Fri Apr 25, 2025 5:13 pm

Texas Chuck wrote:
Godaddycurse wrote:
jayjaysee wrote:I think Houston and Chicago are good trade partners. But it’s in a world where Chicago is selling, not Houston. Jalen, Ayo, Lonzo..

I don’t think Houston is ready to give up on Jabari unless it’s in a star package. Would take an overpay and I think some teams would pay more than OP.

Houston has 2-3 years before they’re in that tax crunch. They can afford to extend or match on Jabari if they want and see who is worth keeping once Amen’a contract is kicking in.


Dont see how jabari is worth more than 12 at this point given how stagnant his numbers have been


So this is interesting to me. I think godaddy isn't wrong to suggest he hasn't shown what was hoped, is on an expensive rookie deal due to his draft spot and its time already to make an extension decision. I can't imagine he agrees to anything team friendly, so he either gets overpaid or plays out his last year, which could be fine but is never ideal.

So I don't think he's worth more than 12 either. But I don't see Houston punting him for that either. I think there is still too much talent there for that. So I would agree if he's dealt its as part of a package for a better player.


If I'm the trade partner, I think I might rather have No. 12 than inherit the player coming off a rookie contract who is neither amenable to a team-friendly deal nor worthy of a rookie max extension. If I have a better fitting roster, future cap room, and he'll sign an extension that contemplates some future growth but is under max money, maybe you can thread that needle.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,371
And1: 98,216
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: Hou-Chi 

Post#18 » by Texas Chuck » Fri Apr 25, 2025 5:19 pm

jbk1234 wrote:If I'm the trade partner, I think I might rather have No. 12 than inherit the player coming off a rookie contract who is neither amenable to a team-friendly deal nor worthy of a rookie max extension. If I have a better fitting roster, future cap room, and he'll sign an extension that contemplates some future growth but is under max money, maybe you can thread that needle.


Sure, but Houston probably isn't going to be able to present them with that option. But as part of a package for a star? He's still an attractive piece.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
User avatar
LarsV8
RealGM
Posts: 10,139
And1: 5,444
Joined: Dec 13, 2009
       

Re: Hou-Chi 

Post#19 » by LarsV8 » Fri Apr 25, 2025 6:16 pm

Jabari is 21, probably the best basketball archetype you can ask for. Long, switchable, shooter, defensive oriented. Can play 3-5.

He didn't "lose" his starting spot, Amen Thompson, a freak of nature, filled in and was so unbelievable, and Houston was winning so many games, Jabari agreed to come off the bench.

I want MORE JBJrs on my team, not less. He is just a winning basketball player.
Image
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,371
And1: 98,216
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: Hou-Chi 

Post#20 » by Texas Chuck » Fri Apr 25, 2025 6:57 pm

I'd have Jokic as the ideal archetype. Or maybe Lebron. But in terms of having length and enough athleticism, sure. Of course the league isn't short of those guys. Smith doesn't jump off the table in that regard at all. At some point his actual play is going to matter more than his measurables.

And I say this as a guy who also thinks Houston should hold on to him unless he's needed in a deal for a real difference maker. But they can't pay everyone and probably not even just he and Eason. So while I might not do it, there is absolutely logic in moving one of them before the deadline where Smith's value is going to be a great deal less.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.

Return to Trades and Transactions