Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
AmIWrongDude wrote:My conclusion is bucket good because it’s inconclusive. Haven’t seen anything that proves it either way. Awesome game though especially when it was looking like a blowout.
dockingsched wrote:AmIWrongDude wrote:My conclusion is bucket good because it’s inconclusive. Haven’t seen anything that proves it either way. Awesome game though especially when it was looking like a blowout.
It’s not inconclusive. During the warriors rockets halftime they showed video that they say the referees relied on. It’s an overheard view and clearly shows Gordon’s hand off the ball at literally the frame the lights came on.
dockingsched wrote:AmIWrongDude wrote:My conclusion is bucket good because it’s inconclusive. Haven’t seen anything that proves it either way. Awesome game though especially when it was looking like a blowout.
It’s not inconclusive. During the warriors rockets halftime they showed video that they say the referees relied on. It’s an overheard view and clearly shows Gordon’s hand off the ball at literally the frame the lights came on.
LakerLegend wrote:LeBron was literally more athletic at 35 than he was at 20
Drakeem wrote:It was already a made basket though. It's not the same as a jumper. The basket already counted the moment it went past the rim. The fingertip stuff is irrelevant at that point.Roscoe Sheed wrote:Wolfgang630 wrote:The ball was through the net. That was an easy call
His hand was still touching the ball
dockingsched wrote:AmIWrongDude wrote:My conclusion is bucket good because it’s inconclusive. Haven’t seen anything that proves it either way. Awesome game though especially when it was looking like a blowout.
It’s not inconclusive. During the warriors rockets halftime they showed video that they say the referees relied on. It’s an overheard view and clearly shows Gordon’s hand off the ball at literally the frame the lights came on.
Iwasawitness wrote:dockingsched wrote:AmIWrongDude wrote:My conclusion is bucket good because it’s inconclusive. Haven’t seen anything that proves it either way. Awesome game though especially when it was looking like a blowout.
It’s not inconclusive. During the warriors rockets halftime they showed video that they say the referees relied on. It’s an overheard view and clearly shows Gordon’s hand off the ball at literally the frame the lights came on.
Yep, saw that too. This was the correct call guys. Stop with this nonsense.
is the Player-Coach who leads the team in points, rebounds and assistsGreen89 wrote:dockingsched wrote:AmIWrongDude wrote:My conclusion is bucket good because it’s inconclusive. Haven’t seen anything that proves it either way. Awesome game though especially when it was looking like a blowout.
It’s not inconclusive. During the warriors rockets halftime they showed video that they say the referees relied on. It’s an overheard view and clearly shows Gordon’s hand off the ball at literally the frame the lights came on.
TNT never showed that angle. When they showed the refs watching the court table monitor, it wasn't an overhead view either. Maybe the refs back in Secaucus saw it.
Optms wrote:Infinite Llamas wrote:Optms wrote:
Sorry that you don't like to hear a different opinion. Am I the only saying the shot wasn't good? No. But yeah, ban everyone for disagreeing with you.
Not ban everyone…
Just you.
Sorry that my opinion hurts you two so deeply. I would report you and him for backseat modderating but its not that serious to me.
Mamba Mentality wrote:MaliBrah wrote:Mamba Mentality wrote:Nuggets get spanked in game 5 is my prediction.
based on what though? for 3/4 games the clippers offense has been nasty. It's going to be another battle to the end like game 1/2/4
Idk what games you’ve been watching but the Clippers have looked like the far better team in this series. They’re deeper, aren’t reliant on one guy to generate all their offense, and have the personnel to dig down on defense when it matters (as evident in this 4th quarter). Should be a 3-1 series if not a sweep right now.
AmIWrongDude wrote:Green89 wrote:dockingsched wrote:It’s not inconclusive. During the warriors rockets halftime they showed video that they say the referees relied on. It’s an overheard view and clearly shows Gordon’s hand off the ball at literally the frame the lights came on.
TNT never showed that angle. When they showed the refs watching the court table monitor, it wasn't an overhead view either. Maybe the refs back in Secaucus saw it.
Ya we shouldn’t have to watch a separate broadcast to know if the right call was made
eyeatoma wrote:LOL Chokic!
Green89 wrote:dockingsched wrote:AmIWrongDude wrote:My conclusion is bucket good because it’s inconclusive. Haven’t seen anything that proves it either way. Awesome game though especially when it was looking like a blowout.
It’s not inconclusive. During the warriors rockets halftime they showed video that they say the referees relied on. It’s an overheard view and clearly shows Gordon’s hand off the ball at literally the frame the lights came on.
TNT never showed that angle. When they showed the refs watching the court table monitor, it wasn't an overhead view either. Maybe the refs back in Secaucus saw it.
LakerLegend wrote:LeBron was literally more athletic at 35 than he was at 20
Iwasawitness wrote:Green89 wrote:dockingsched wrote:It’s not inconclusive. During the warriors rockets halftime they showed video that they say the referees relied on. It’s an overheard view and clearly shows Gordon’s hand off the ball at literally the frame the lights came on.
TNT never showed that angle. When they showed the refs watching the court table monitor, it wasn't an overhead view either. Maybe the refs back in Secaucus saw it.
Um, yeah they did. They literally showed it during halftime.
EDIT: Wait I'm drunk af. I meant to say ABC showed it. But yes, they showed an overhead angle that they confirmed the refs themselves saw which is what made them decide the basket counted.
___Rand___ wrote:Marvel wrote:___Rand___ wrote:
His 2nd to last 3 attempt I would agree was dumb. His last 3 attempt he had little time left when he got the ball outside the 3 point line. He had to take a shot or get violation. It was a dumb play call.
He had 12 seconds to get a shot off. Plenty of time.
No. It was 13 seconds when Harden started the play. He tried to get around a defender then passed the ball to a wide open role player near the 3 point line who looked at the bucket and decided to pass the ball to Kawhi with 5 seconds left. Kawhi was outside the 3 line with a defender in his face and another nearby. He looked to drive and seeing defenders set up for it decided to take a jump shot 3. I remember thinking that's so dumb for Harden to run the clock down and do that. Go back and watch that possession.
Drakeem wrote:The ball was literally in the net.Marvel wrote:Fingers were literally on the ball. Ref's are trash.
Green89 wrote:AmIWrongDude wrote:Green89 wrote:
TNT never showed that angle. When they showed the refs watching the court table monitor, it wasn't an overhead view either. Maybe the refs back in Secaucus saw it.
Ya we shouldn’t have to watch a separate broadcast to know if the right call was made
Just awful video crew in the end of that game. They never showed the best angle (overhead) and they never even slowed down and paused the video angles they did have, to better see the moment the light went on. They kept letting it play right past it.
