Scizzup wrote:Nebuchadnezzar wrote:Scizzup wrote:
I do not care much for a 5 game sample size this on the season as a whole. he is been fine on defense but not elite.
but wait, did you just say Pascal is the best playmaker on the team and he is creating more for his teammates. A team that has Halliburton??? Not only is Siakam not the best shot creator, he is not even the 2nd best playmaker on the team. Also, Haliuburton gets doubled more than Siakam. Wtf are you even saying.
No need to get nasty.
This is not just a five-game sample size, it is a playoff series win in five games against Giannis. Pascal is proving he's an elite performer in the playoffs, something a ridiculous faction on this board always said that he couldn't do .
Pascal plays more of a Yak role for the Pacers, so gets a bunch of hockey assists operating at the top of the key. He then Passes really well out of any double teams - he has way more complexity in his approach than Hali who mostly gets counting stats including benefiting from Pascal getting him the ball in positions where Hali can make easy passes/assists.
I don't know how else to let you know, what you are saying is not backed by anything (regarding playmaking or creator).
Pascal is averaging 0.5 secondary assists this series with 5.3 potential assists. He is also getting doubled a lot less than Haliburton.
Haliburton for example is up to 17 potential assists (3rd behind Jokic and Cade) and 2.3 secondary assists (most in the playoffs). Pacers offense is 23p100 better without Siakam this series. Nehmard has been a better playmaker than Siakam this series.
Edit: I already said Pascal has been great, he just is not the engine to Pacers offense or their best player.
I think best player is debatable. Haliburton has been wildly inconsistent and/or injured since Pascal arrived in Indiana. Pascal is the leading scorer and is way more efficient then Tyrese... Never heard that a teams leading scorer isn't an engine to the offense...


























