cgf wrote:GiannisAnte34 wrote:This is the real 2vs3 seed series lol
Celtics more fitting to be #1 and Knicks more fitting to be #4
I have to admire your spunk
I feel this series will be closer than the Knicks Celtics series, we'll see
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
cgf wrote:GiannisAnte34 wrote:This is the real 2vs3 seed series lol
Celtics more fitting to be #1 and Knicks more fitting to be #4
I have to admire your spunk
GiannisAnte34 wrote:cgf wrote:GiannisAnte34 wrote:This is the real 2vs3 seed series lol
Celtics more fitting to be #1 and Knicks more fitting to be #4
I have to admire your spunk
I feel this series will be closer than the Knicks Celtics series, we'll see
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.
cgf wrote:xxSnEaKyPxx wrote:cgf wrote:
Yeah, I like Ben Shepherd off their bench as well…and Walker is super interesting. Their d sucked to start last season but since the lineup change they’ve been pretty tenacious, with a style that wears out teams with less depth, on both ends.
I get what you mean, but some of that is just that this team didn’t have a training camp together, so have had to figure things on the fly…which was complicated by all of the injuries to the limited depth we do have; Robinson ~60 games, Shamet ~30, Achiuwa ~20, McBride & Payne ~10 each; forcing the starters to play crazy minutes, which forced Thibs to cut back on practices.
Luckily that has turned around and we finally got to see our top 7 all healthy for the same game before the end of the regular season, and Brunson’s ankle is the only major health concern at the moment…and we’ve been beating the Pistons without busting some of the things so many of us are clamoring for, and giving Boston tape to pick apart.
But I also don’t think we’re 0-8 below the top 3. We got blown out by each of the top 3 once, but the other games were all close until we gassed in the 4th…despite only having our top 7 for one of those 8 games; the OT loss to Boston, which was the second time we faced them as our third game in four nights, and 3 of the Cleveland games being the second night of a b2b. With 7 guys Thibs trusts + the fringe guys + proper rest, we shouldn’t gas in the 4 like we did in most of the RS matchups…whether that’s enough for us to win or not.
We still smacked the Pacers, Nuggets, Grizzlies, Magic, etc. around the way the top 3 smacked us around. Which makes me think we’re a cut above most of the field…even health + rest isn’t enough to get us in that top tier
Well, the defense largely sucked because Nembhard and Nesmith, our two best perimeter defenders, both missed a lot of games, then both of our backup Centers got injured, so we had no one behind Turner. It was more of a health issue than anything.
I meant last season before the rotation shake up. This season yeah, it was all injuries that left you 10-15 to start the campaign.
cgf wrote:GiannisAnte34 wrote:cgf wrote:
I have to admire your spunk
I feel this series will be closer than the Knicks Celtics series, we'll see
I think both series will be closer than people expect and go 7.
The east has a really good top 4 this season. Now that Giannis & the two feisty up-n-comer's are out, it’s just the 4 teams I wouldn’t be shocked to see in the final.
GiannisAnte34 wrote:cgf wrote:GiannisAnte34 wrote:
I feel this series will be closer than the Knicks Celtics series, we'll see
I think both series will be closer than people expect and go 7.
The east has a really good top 4 this season. Now that Giannis & the two feisty up-n-comer's are out, it’s just the 4 teams I wouldn’t be shocked to see in the final.
I fully expect the Celtics in the Finals again, they’re just too stacked with that starting lineup and off the bench they’ve got PP and Big Al
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.
Wizop wrote:durden_tyler wrote:Series Odds:
Cavaliers -2.5 vs Pacers
Meaning you bet on the Cavaliers here you need to the series finished in six games (4-2). i would have thought this is going to be closer but Vegas does not think of it that way.
Wouldn't it have to be 4 - 1?
2 + 2.5 > 4
Kameleon wrote:Post from Realcavsfans and I couldnt agree more. But this is sport so we will see.
"Fun matchups!
1. We'll target Haliburton like we did Heiro--with the same success.
2. We'll treat Turner like Adabayo--double-teaming him and frustrating him with Jarrett and Mobley--with the same success.
3. We'll use a lot of Mobley, Wade, and Hunter on Siakim--and he'll get frustrated, especially trying to defend Mobley and Hunter. He may get in foul trouble.
4. Garland and Mitchell will be able to score at will.
5. If we keep our turnovers down, it'll be a 4 game sweep"
Kameleon wrote:Post from Realcavsfans and I couldnt agree more. But this is sport so we will see.
"Fun matchups!
1. We'll target Haliburton like we did Heiro--with the same success.
2. We'll treat Turner like Adabayo--double-teaming him and frustrating him with Jarrett and Mobley--with the same success.
3. We'll use a lot of Mobley, Wade, and Hunter on Siakim--and he'll get frustrated, especially trying to defend Mobley and Hunter. He may get in foul trouble.
4. Garland and Mitchell will be able to score at will.
5. If we keep our turnovers down, it'll be a 4 game sweep"
I think some key differences is that they're not going to want to leave Turner open from 3 and dare him to shoot, like they did Bam. Turner will lace those in their eye. Cavs also used Hunter and Wade on Bam for stretches which i think would be an awful idea with Turner's size.Kameleon wrote:Post from Realcavsfans and I couldnt agree more. But this is sport so we will see.
"Fun matchups!
1. We'll target Haliburton like we did Heiro--with the same success.
2. We'll treat Turner like Adabayo--double-teaming him and frustrating him with Jarrett and Mobley--with the same success.
3. We'll use a lot of Mobley, Wade, and Hunter on Siakim--and he'll get frustrated, especially trying to defend Mobley and Hunter. He may get in foul trouble.
4. Garland and Mitchell will be able to score at will.
5. If we keep our turnovers down, it'll be a 4 game sweep"
Kameleon wrote:Post from Realcavsfans and I couldnt agree more. But this is sport so we will see.
"Fun matchups!
1. We'll target Haliburton like we did Heiro--with the same success.
2. We'll treat Turner like Adabayo--double-teaming him and frustrating him with Jarrett and Mobley--with the same success.
3. We'll use a lot of Mobley, Wade, and Hunter on Siakim--and he'll get frustrated, especially trying to defend Mobley and Hunter. He may get in foul trouble.
4. Garland and Mitchell will be able to score at will.
5. If we keep our turnovers down, it'll be a 4 game sweep"
Kameleon wrote:Post from Realcavsfans and I couldnt agree more. But this is sport so we will see.
"Fun matchups!
1. We'll target Haliburton like we did Heiro--with the same success.
2. We'll treat Turner like Adabayo--double-teaming him and frustrating him with Jarrett and Mobley--with the same success.
3. We'll use a lot of Mobley, Wade, and Hunter on Siakim--and he'll get frustrated, especially trying to defend Mobley and Hunter. He may get in foul trouble.
4. Garland and Mitchell will be able to score at will.
5. If we keep our turnovers down, it'll be a 4 game sweep"
That is sort of the D the Cavs played in the 1st round. But Kenny and Johnnie Bryant are not rigid in their approach, like bickerstaff was the 3 postseasons before them. I am sure they will have a defense tailored to the Pacers scheme and personnel.Wizop wrote:Kameleon wrote:Post from Realcavsfans and I couldnt agree more. But this is sport so we will see.
"Fun matchups!
1. We'll target Haliburton like we did Heiro--with the same success.
2. We'll treat Turner like Adabayo--double-teaming him and frustrating him with Jarrett and Mobley--with the same success.
3. We'll use a lot of Mobley, Wade, and Hunter on Siakim--and he'll get frustrated, especially trying to defend Mobley and Hunter. He may get in foul trouble.
4. Garland and Mitchell will be able to score at will.
5. If we keep our turnovers down, it'll be a 4 game sweep"
so you are going to double team Haliburton (your #1), Turner (your #2), and Siakam (your #3)?
JujitsuFlip wrote:Wizop wrote:so you are going to double team Haliburton (your #1), Turner (your #2), and Siakam (your #3)?
That is sort of the D the Cavs played in the 1st round. But Kenny and Johnnie Bryant are not rigid in their approach, like bickerstaff was the 3 postseasons before them. I am sure they will have a defense tailored to the Pacers scheme and personnel.
Wizop wrote:JujitsuFlip wrote:Wizop wrote:so you are going to double team Haliburton (your #1), Turner (your #2), and Siakam (your #3)?
That is sort of the D the Cavs played in the 1st round. But Kenny and Johnnie Bryant are not rigid in their approach, like bickerstaff was the 3 postseasons before them. I am sure they will have a defense tailored to the Pacers scheme and personnel.
But you can't do all three things at the same time. The Pacers are at our best when the ball moves. Passing out of double teams could be key.
oikosnomos wrote:IBut if they can get Turner to take mid-range shots, they'll probably be happy with that.
They weren't like true double teams. No Cav was really guarding any 1 guy.Wizop wrote:JujitsuFlip wrote:Wizop wrote:so you are going to double team Haliburton (your #1), Turner (your #2), and Siakam (your #3)?
That is sort of the D the Cavs played in the 1st round. But Kenny and Johnnie Bryant are not rigid in their approach, like bickerstaff was the 3 postseasons before them. I am sure they will have a defense tailored to the Pacers scheme and personnel.
But you can't do all three things at the same time. The Pacers are at our best when the ball moves. Passing out of double teams could be key.