Frank Nova wrote:I get that Flagg is the shiny new draft toy but ppl do realize he reclassified to avoid the 2026 draft because there was zero chance he was going to be the top prospect right? Dybansta, Peterson and Boozer were all rated higher as high school prospects than him. He wouldn’t even be a consensus top 3 pick next year let alone the top guy. Trading Giannis for him is absolutely crazy and short sighted at a minimum. You want draft picks for Giannis, load up on 2026 lotto tickets not 2025.
Flagg will be a good pro but a generational talent he’s something he is not.
This is all just not true. Flagg re-classified because he was so advanced he was scrimmaging w/ the senior US team, more than ready for college, & wanted to jump to the pros early. Then he won nat'l player of the yr as a re-classified hs senior. Only 3 frosh had ever done it period. All 3 are or would be All NBA players if they played enough games to qualify - Durant, AD, Zion.
As if there were 3 more guys in '25 that would have won nat'l player of the year in '24, let alone as hs seniors. In no draft would Flagg go not even third. That's absurd. He had a ton of advanced hype & he improved his stock because he showed the ability to be a #1 option due to passing & touch above a level that was believed before. Outside of LeBron & Wemby, nobody's clearly been a better prospect than him this century. If you want to call that generational or not is rather semantical. He projects to be an All NBA player is what matters.
What would be crazy would be to reject the quality of Flagg, a good player to match salaries/prospect & a few picks, maybe while absorbing a bad salary; instead choosing many random picks, possibly lower in the 1st rd where your hit rate for guys a tier or two below Flagg is <50%.