HopelessKnick wrote:Gravy wrote:KnicksGadfly wrote:
You know, the Cavs actually lost the game by playing this style. Brunson is better at it than Mitchell, but yea...the Cavs lost doing this, so maybe the Knicks might not want to keep doing it. This might not be the best defense of Thibs. Maybe more of an indictment of both Mobley and Atkinson imo.
I'd say the main reason they lost is Garland is really good and he did not play. Style and scheme can only take you so far without enough talent.
I agree, like take Siakam or Turner out for a game against a healthy Cleveland team and Indy has no chance. Indiana must be one of the luckiest franchises recently---whoever they face in the playoffs has like a top player out.
Sure, but that’s not the point. The point is why it devolved to Ty Jerome and Mitchell combining for 50 shots. Does the blame fall on the coach or not for that? Is it sustainable or not?
I’m willing to give a coach a pass for one game but I don’t think that shot distribution is ideal for the Cavs, considering that they probably want Mobley involved.