LSWF wrote:Lakers are better than the Warriors.
Lakers *were* better than the Warriors. Then they traded away AD.
Moderators: bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake
LSWF wrote:Lakers are better than the Warriors.
LSWF wrote:Raonak wrote:LSWF wrote:Lakers are better than the Warriors.
Warriors have worse defense which is gonna make Ant pop open a lot more.
The Rockets made the Warriors look like certified snipers. The reality is that warriors offense can be shut down by good defense.
Are you ok? Nothing you write makes sense.
Warriors have a substantially better defense than the lakers.
Rockets shut down warriors because they are a #2 defense.
Warriors never looked like snipers til buddy hield went crazy.
I'm doing great. I'm just mocking your rather simplistic take.
Raonak wrote:LSWF wrote:Raonak wrote:
Are you ok? Nothing you write makes sense.
Warriors have a substantially better defense than the lakers.
Rockets shut down warriors because they are a #2 defense.
Warriors never looked like snipers til buddy hield went crazy.
I'm doing great. I'm just mocking your rather simplistic take.
If you're gonna make simplistic takes, atleast come up with a response that isn't filled with obvious lies.
Do you seriously believe that lakers have a better defense than the warriors.
Surely even you aren't that delusional?
floppymoose wrote:LSWF wrote:Lakers are better than the Warriors.
Lakers *were* better than the Warriors. Then they traded away AD.
Klomp wrote:nitric0 wrote:FWIW Warriors rae 3-1 against the Timberwolves and that's all without Jimmy.
Yeah and the Suns went 4-0 against the Timberwolves during the 2023-24 regular season.....and the Timberwolves went 3-1 against Dallas.
The postseason is a different game. All four matchups were a full month before the all-star game, there's not much to be taken from them.
“We were right there with them. We dominated for most of the game, but then Derrick Rose happened.” - Al Horford
LSWF wrote:Lakers are better than the Warriors.
TrueFan420 wrote:It's the first time Golden State has been an underdog in a postseason series since 2014, when the Warriors were +170 underdogs against the Los Angeles Clippers in Round 1 and lost in seven games (per Sports Odds History's database).
Twinkie defense wrote:LSWF wrote:Lakers are better than the Warriors.
IDK how this series will shake out but Lakers made a big mistake by swapping out their defensive anchor for a defensive turnstile. Especially for playoff games. And I've been saying this since the trade - people are not respecting the impact that Anthony Davis had for the Lakers.
Twinkie defense wrote:TrueFan420 wrote:It's the first time Golden State has been an underdog in a postseason series since 2014, when the Warriors were +170 underdogs against the Los Angeles Clippers in Round 1 and lost in seven games (per Sports Odds History's database).
You know we don't like to talk about the Mark Jackson era...
Optms wrote:floppymoose wrote:LSWF wrote:Lakers are better than the Warriors.
Lakers *were* better than the Warriors. Then they traded away AD.
Dubs became better before and after the moment Butler came on.
Warriors have been the most trojan horse contender since the trade deadline and everyone for some reason is acting like it isn't happening. Dismantled the 2nd seed Rockets on the road in a game 7.
Only OKC and Boston can stop them, and IMO, Dubs will beat OKC. Not sure about Boston.
LSWF wrote:Raonak wrote:Warriors in 6.
Rockets are better than the wolves.
Wolves have worse defense which is gonna make Steph pop open a lot more.
The Lakers made the wolves look like certified snipers. The reality is that wolves offense can be shut down by good defenses.
Lakers are better than the Warriors.
Warriors have worse defense which is gonna make Ant pop open a lot more.
The Rockets made the Warriors look like certified snipers. The reality is that warriors offense can be shut down by good defense.
Twinkie defense wrote:LSWF wrote:Lakers are better than the Warriors.
IDK how this series will shake out but Lakers made a big mistake by swapping out their defensive anchor for a defensive turnstile. Especially for playoff games. And I've been saying this since the trade - people are not respecting the impact that Anthony Davis had for the Lakers.
LSWF wrote:Raonak wrote:LSWF wrote:I'm doing great. I'm just mocking your rather simplistic take.
If you're gonna make simplistic takes, atleast come up with a response that isn't filled with obvious lies.
Do you seriously believe that lakers have a better defense than the warriors.
Surely even you aren't that delusional?
There is no world in which I think "The Rockets are better than the Wolves". They are a well coached, up and coming team with very little PO experience. They gave the Warriors a heck of a battle. Are they really a better defensive team than the Wolves? It's debatable. I think the depth of talented Wolves defenders is underrated.
The Warriors are smaller than the Lakers. Will it matter defensively against the Wolves? It might, we will see.
TrueFan420 wrote:LSWF wrote:Raonak wrote:
If you're gonna make simplistic takes, atleast come up with a response that isn't filled with obvious lies.
Do you seriously believe that lakers have a better defense than the warriors.
Surely even you aren't that delusional?
There is no world in which I think "The Rockets are better than the Wolves". They are a well coached, up and coming team with very little PO experience. They gave the Warriors a heck of a battle. Are they really a better defensive team than the Wolves? It's debatable. I think the depth of talented Wolves defenders is underrated.
The Warriors are smaller than the Lakers. Will it matter defensively against the Wolves? It might, we will see.
The Lakers don’t have anyone who can defend at the level that Dray and Jimmy do.
We don’t have much height that is true. It will be interesting to see if we can punish them while playing small or if they can punish us for our lack of size with Gobert/Randle/Naz.
LSWF wrote:TrueFan420 wrote:LSWF wrote:There is no world in which I think "The Rockets are better than the Wolves". They are a well coached, up and coming team with very little PO experience. They gave the Warriors a heck of a battle. Are they really a better defensive team than the Wolves? It's debatable. I think the depth of talented Wolves defenders is underrated.
The Warriors are smaller than the Lakers. Will it matter defensively against the Wolves? It might, we will see.
The Lakers don’t have anyone who can defend at the level that Dray and Jimmy do.
We don’t have much height that is true. It will be interesting to see if we can punish them while playing small or if they can punish us for our lack of size with Gobert/Randle/Naz.
Don't forget Jaden, nobody blocking his middy.
TrueFan420 wrote:LSWF wrote:TrueFan420 wrote:The Lakers don’t have anyone who can defend at the level that Dray and Jimmy do.
We don’t have much height that is true. It will be interesting to see if we can punish them while playing small or if they can punish us for our lack of size with Gobert/Randle/Naz.
Don't forget Jaden, nobody blocking his middy.
He’s not small but he’s more of a wing than a big so I didn’t include him with that group. He does add to their overall length though. Will certainly make for an interesting series.
TrueFan420 wrote:LSWF wrote:TrueFan420 wrote:The Lakers don’t have anyone who can defend at the level that Dray and Jimmy do.
We don’t have much height that is true. It will be interesting to see if we can punish them while playing small or if they can punish us for our lack of size with Gobert/Randle/Naz.
Don't forget Jaden, nobody blocking his middy.
He’s not small but he’s more of a wing than a big so I didn’t include him with that group. He does add to their overall length though. Will certainly make for an interesting series.