ProcessDoctor wrote:I need to stop watching awesome Ace Bailey highlights.
Here's 2 hours of propaganda-cleansing Ace Bailey play. You can see the good and the bad.
Moderators: HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Foshan, Sixerscan, sixers hoops
ProcessDoctor wrote:I need to stop watching awesome Ace Bailey highlights.
Iverson Armband wrote:Will Flagg/Bailey be another Simmons/Ingram situation?
Negrodamus wrote:ProcessDoctor wrote:I need to stop watching awesome Ace Bailey highlights.
Here's 2 hours of propaganda-cleansing Ace Bailey play. You can see the good and the bad.
76ciology wrote:Negrodamus wrote:76ciology wrote:
It’s largely due to the role Duke asked him to play and the system they run.
His time at Duke highlighted his high floor as a mobile big who can step out, rebound, protect the paint, and rim run effectively on offense. In contrast, his pre Duke performances and workout showings revealed greater upside, suggesting he’s capable of more than what Duke’s scheme allowed.
His willingness to embrace a limited role for the sake of the team also reflects his maturity.
Dereck Lively had: 12.7 BLK%, 9.8 AST%, 1.5 STL%
Similar roles at Duke. I obviously wouldn't have taken him in the top 10, but the BLK% and AST% would both have to be >10 for me to even consider, especially on a guy playing limited minutes.
Lively wasn’t playing with Flagg and Kneuppel.
Rebounding:
Lively 12.8 OREB% 17.8DREB%
Maluach 16.5 OREB% 19.5DREB%
I’m also not evaluating him solely based on what he showed at Duke, but factoring in his performances outside the NCAA, where he flashed real upside with his ball handling and shooting. If he were just a rim runner, which is what I initially thought when Stormi brought him up months ago, I’d see him as more of a mid to late 1st round prospect.
Negrodamus wrote:You know Morey is looking at Harper thinking he's the next Harden.
ProcessDoctor wrote:Negrodamus wrote:You know Morey is looking at Harper thinking he's the next Harden.
Was actually looking at that comp yesterday. Harden really has been a FTA monster his whole playing career.
https://www.tankathon.com/players/compare?players=dylan-harper--james-harden
Negrodamus wrote:ProcessDoctor wrote:Negrodamus wrote:You know Morey is looking at Harper thinking he's the next Harden.
Was actually looking at that comp yesterday. Harden really has been a FTA monster his whole playing career.
https://www.tankathon.com/players/compare?players=dylan-harper--james-harden
I obviously like Harden's shot over the course of his career more so than what Harper's looks like, but Harper's form isn't a disaster or anything. It just doesn't look as effortless or high as Harden's. Harden also had winning teams in his two years at ASU with a bunch of no names back when the Pac-12 was actually good.
Not enough to drop Harper, but those concerns are real to me.
Negrodamus wrote:76ciology wrote:Negrodamus wrote:
Dereck Lively had: 12.7 BLK%, 9.8 AST%, 1.5 STL%
Similar roles at Duke. I obviously wouldn't have taken him in the top 10, but the BLK% and AST% would both have to be >10 for me to even consider, especially on a guy playing limited minutes.
Lively wasn’t playing with Flagg and Kneuppel.
Rebounding:
Lively 12.8 OREB% 17.8DREB%
Maluach 16.5 OREB% 19.5DREB%
I’m also not evaluating him solely based on what he showed at Duke, but factoring in his performances outside the NCAA, where he flashed real upside with his ball handling and shooting. If he were just a rim runner, which is what I initially thought when Stormi brought him up months ago, I’d see him as more of a mid to late 1st round prospect.
I actually think he'd be going back to school if he didn't go to Duke. I'm watching all of his shots this season and I'm still waiting for a moment like this:
There's no interest self creation on any of these highlights. It's a PnR alley oop/layup or he's getting an offensive rebound putback. Being 7'2 and being the beneficiary of passes from two 6'7+ massive gravity, top ten pick passing forwards really doesn't move the needle for me even if that is his "role". Kneuppel was able to put up some pretty gaudy numbers, particularly his advance stats, in a role he apparently hasn't play much (off ball shooter, secondary handler). If Maluach is an insta-bucket in the post, you'd think they would let him cook against a league of generally sub 7'ers. He looks like a Capela type big in what I'm seeing. There's value to that; but he's not Joel Embiid.
Negrodamus wrote:I think I'm currently at:
1. Flagg
2. Harper
3. Queen
4. Fears
5. Jakucionis
6. Edgecombe
7. Tre Johnson
8.Yaxel Lendebourg
9. Ace
10. Nique Clifford
Need to see the measurements of everyone to feel confident. Ace and Fears are the only ones who don't hit my BPM prerequisite. Sorber and probably that aforementioned Mega kid I posted earlier would be just outside. The tape on some of these guys are a little disqualifying on defense, but I don't know, I keep getting cooked by being turned off by poor defensive effort in college. Jakucionis and Tre do not hit the STL% mark that I'm usually looking for. Of the freshmen that hit everything I'm looking for statistically, it's: Flagg, Harper, Queen, Fears, Edgecombe.
ProcessDoctor wrote:I'm really starting to think Essengue is gonna be that "LOL why did so many teams pass on him?" prospect.
Negrodamus wrote:76ciology wrote:Negrodamus wrote:
Dereck Lively had: 12.7 BLK%, 9.8 AST%, 1.5 STL%
Similar roles at Duke. I obviously wouldn't have taken him in the top 10, but the BLK% and AST% would both have to be >10 for me to even consider, especially on a guy playing limited minutes.
Lively wasn’t playing with Flagg and Kneuppel.
Rebounding:
Lively 12.8 OREB% 17.8DREB%
Maluach 16.5 OREB% 19.5DREB%
I’m also not evaluating him solely based on what he showed at Duke, but factoring in his performances outside the NCAA, where he flashed real upside with his ball handling and shooting. If he were just a rim runner, which is what I initially thought when Stormi brought him up months ago, I’d see him as more of a mid to late 1st round prospect.
I actually think he'd be going back to school if he didn't go to Duke. I'm watching all of his shots this season and I'm still waiting for a moment like this:
There's no interest self creation on any of these highlights. It's a PnR alley oop/layup or he's getting an offensive rebound putback. Being 7'2 and being the beneficiary of passes from two 6'7+ massive gravity, top ten pick passing forwards really doesn't move the needle for me even if that is his "role". Kneuppel was able to put up some pretty gaudy numbers, particularly his advance stats, in a role he apparently hasn't play much (off ball shooter, secondary handler). If Maluach is an insta-bucket in the post, you'd think they would let him cook against a league of generally sub 7'ers. He looks like a Capela type big in what I'm seeing. There's value to that; but he's not Joel Embiid.
PhillyFan11 wrote:I see very little talk about Maluach. Is that because he’s not a top 6 prospect? Or because we have Embiid?
If you only focus on his Duke data, you’ll see a Mark Williams or Clint Capela type. But if you consider his entire body of work, his floor might still be Mark Williams or Capela, while his ceiling could be closer to Kristaps Porzingis.
76ciology wrote:Negrodamus wrote:76ciology wrote:
Lively wasn’t playing with Flagg and Kneuppel.
Rebounding:
Lively 12.8 OREB% 17.8DREB%
Maluach 16.5 OREB% 19.5DREB%
I’m also not evaluating him solely based on what he showed at Duke, but factoring in his performances outside the NCAA, where he flashed real upside with his ball handling and shooting. If he were just a rim runner, which is what I initially thought when Stormi brought him up months ago, I’d see him as more of a mid to late 1st round prospect.
I actually think he'd be going back to school if he didn't go to Duke. I'm watching all of his shots this season and I'm still waiting for a moment like this:
There's no interest self creation on any of these highlights. It's a PnR alley oop/layup or he's getting an offensive rebound putback. Being 7'2 and being the beneficiary of passes from two 6'7+ massive gravity, top ten pick passing forwards really doesn't move the needle for me even if that is his "role". Kneuppel was able to put up some pretty gaudy numbers, particularly his advance stats, in a role he apparently hasn't play much (off ball shooter, secondary handler). If Maluach is an insta-bucket in the post, you'd think they would let him cook against a league of generally sub 7'ers. He looks like a Capela type big in what I'm seeing. There's value to that; but he's not Joel Embiid.
Yes, because he’s playing alongside Cooper Flagg and Knueppel, which naturally limits his usage into just a rim roller and has some effect on his blk numbers (his rim protection is still elite). And if I were to guess, the stint he has on Duke was to show that he can have a high floor playing a limited role as the typical rim roll, rim protection and rebounding big.
Plus, Embiid was 1 year and 6 months older than Maluach in those clips and far more raw at the same stage. At Maluach’s age, Embiid was still shooting from behind the basket. To really understand the upside people see in Maluach, you’ve got to check out his pre-Duke highlights.
If you only focus on his Duke data, you’ll see a Mark Williams or Clint Capela type. But if you consider his entire body of work, his floor might still be Mark Williams or Capela, while his ceiling could be closer to Kristaps Porzingis.
Reference
https://theswishtheory.com/scouting-reports/khaman-maluach/
https://floorandceiling.substack.com/p/2025-nba-draft-khaman-maluach-no-2-dylan-harper
Negrodamus wrote:
What’s your best video that reminds you of Porzingis when watching him? Not being facetious, I honestly want to see one video that inspires “top 10” for me while watching him.