mpharris36 wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:We have led the score in 9% of all minutes played in the series.
The Knicks being up 2-1 after 3 games in this series is a major upset and feels like a win. Yet, I feel less optimistic about the team's chances than I did before the series.
We've been thoroughly outclassed and outplayed so far. And it took some exceptionally bad shooting from the Celtics in games 1 and 2 for us to have a chance to mount a comeback.
The question is can we scrap two more wins like the Nuggets did against the Sonics in 1994?
I think it's quite easy and convenient to pile on KAT for his defense when Brunson has been a bigger liability defensively. The more significant issue to me is that, besides some clutch shots by Brunson in Boston, neither has played like a star offensively, and we need them to provide elite offense to stay in the game with Boston's 3-point machine. If neither steps their game up, we're likely toast.
5-18 FGAs from KAT is not going to cut it, especially as Mazzzula fouls Mitch out of the series. KAT was a mess on offense. Brunson's final boxscore numbers are misleading, he did not have a good game offensively either. Let's see if either one of them can have a big game on Monday or whenever game 4 is. We're gonna need a dominant performance, likely from JB.
I agree with a lot of your saying. And I ask why do you think Brunson and KAT are struggling? BOS has a very good defense so I will give them that. But it was the same struggles vs a much less talented defensive team in DET. Brunson wasn't overly EFF in that series even with a monster game 6 on the road.
KAT shot the ball decent but now in 3 games vs BOS and 6 games vs DET KAT is taking 3.5 3's per game, even then some of KATs make are crazy...he has to make some really difficult shots because nothing is schemed easy for us. That is dowright ubsurd. Under 4 attempts from 3 from our best shooter? How is that legit offense? How is our coach inable to scheme KAT to take more 3's...we have beeen guarded this was since Jan...no excuse now to just run the same "read and react" BS offense and just hope the talent level of Brunson/KAT bail us out.
Like you said...Brunson and KAT we already know aren't good defenders...they have to be on the top of there game offensively to really make this work. The fact both continue to struggle really only pts to one thing for me. Everything is a grind...everything is a struggle. We don't really try anything different. Its the same vanilla offense we have been running all year. Its just that early in the year KAT was being guarded by Centers and he kills those matchups.
Fully agree. I think it's a combination of factors.
Thibs prefers to run an isolation offense because it limits turnovers.
Brunson and KAT are not better than the sum of their parts. Brunson's mindset is focused on scoring rather than playmaking, and KAT's probably not an aggressive screen setter.
We can't run a 5-out offense with Hart on the court. Not a criticism of Hart, but his lack of shooting throws a wrench in the works. I agree with you Hart should be setting more off-ball screens for KAT.
And I think there's no excuse for the low 3-point shooting output, for which I think Thibs is largely responsible. It's a low-risk, low-reward offense. In a series where our defensive weak points can be exposed, I don't know if this safe approach to offense can produce enough points. It makes sense to use our qualities in the midrange down the stretch of a close game, but we need to take more 3s over the course of 48 minutes. Including our stars.