cupcakesnake wrote:
I'd much rather beat this team with Curry playing, but he's injured and all we can do now is beat Jimmy.
Don't play the "Steph was torching the Wolves before he went out" card unless you're ready to agree with San Antonio fans that Kawhi was going to sweep you in 2017, if you know what I mean?13 minutes doesn't give us something to project in a series. Draymond went 4-5 from 3 during that span. Had he gotten hurt, would you be telling me Draymond was going to go 32-40 from 3 in a quick sweep? We came to this series with defensive resources to throw at Steph, but obviously Steph is a transformative offensive player and especially on this roster he's the be all end all. He's also 37 and being asked to play a massive role for a deep playoff run.
I'm not happy about the Steph injury at all. I was excited for this series and to get to watch Steph. Total bummer that he's out. Even purely from a Wolves perspective, if we win, nobody cares. If we lose, it will be humiliating. I'd much rather play (win or lose) the Warriors at full strength. I liked our advantages in this series when I project
I wasn't trying to denigrate winning who is in front of you, was saying it's not a series I would flex on winning. I'm not an asterisk guy, but I certainly didn't beat my chest after beating the Kawhi-less Spurs. Just found the Jimmy image confusing considering the Wolves in fact did not make the playoffs the next 3 seasons without him (and just beat the Curry-less Warriors), and the entire Wolves team is different now (there isn't 1 player left from that 17-18 team).
I do root for the Wolves so I don't have any negative feelings here, if the Wolves win (which seems likely) I'll continue to root for them.