RoteSchroder wrote:With the layout of this draft, you either want #1 or multiple picks throughout the 1st round
Not sure the order of 2-10 will matter that much in the long run
Thankfully after all this "rebuilding" we have neither of those.
Moderators: Morris_Shatford, 7 Footer, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX
RoteSchroder wrote:With the layout of this draft, you either want #1 or multiple picks throughout the 1st round
Not sure the order of 2-10 will matter that much in the long run


XTC wrote:It was a fun ride brothers.
Tired of arguing with these fake casuals who think it might be better to win fake games than tank properly.
I'm here for the ride, I'm here for mediocrity.

XTC wrote:It was a fun ride brothers.
Tired of arguing with these fake casuals who think it might be better to win fake games than tank properly.
I'm here for the ride, I'm here for mediocrity.
Duffman100 wrote:XTC wrote:It was a fun ride brothers.
Tired of arguing with these fake casuals who think it might be better to win fake games than tank properly.
I'm here for the ride, I'm here for mediocrity.
The teams that tanked properly aren't in the top 3.
So...



720 wrote:



720 wrote:Duffman100 wrote:XTC wrote:It was a fun ride brothers.
Tired of arguing with these fake casuals who think it might be better to win fake games than tank properly.
I'm here for the ride, I'm here for mediocrity.
The teams that tanked properly aren't in the top 3.
So...
Sixers tanked properly and are 3rd. All the other teams that tanked properly with worse records than us have higher picks than us (Wizards, Jazz, Hornets, Nets, all have higher picks than us). Spurs tanked properly and got down to 8th best odds to then move up.
Duffman100 wrote:720 wrote:Duffman100 wrote:
The teams that tanked properly aren't in the top 3.
So...
Sixers tanked properly and are 3rd. All the other teams that tanked properly with worse records than us have higher picks than us (Wizards, Jazz, Hornets, Nets, all have higher picks than us). Spurs tanked properly and got down to 8th best odds to then move up.
lol. The spurs tanked properly? And we didn't?
The teams that gutted their entire core now have 4-6th picks and this success?
Cmon man, even for you this is pretty bad.



720 wrote:Duffman100 wrote:720 wrote:Sixers tanked properly and are 3rd. All the other teams that tanked properly with worse records than us have higher picks than us (Wizards, Jazz, Hornets, Nets, all have higher picks than us). Spurs tanked properly and got down to 8th best odds to then move up.
lol. The spurs tanked properly? And we didn't?
The teams that gutted their entire core now have 4-6th picks and this success?
Cmon man, even for you this is pretty bad.
The spurs had no business being down where they were. They literally sat key guys and tanked down the stretch. They did the opposite of what we did.

Duffman100 wrote:720 wrote:Duffman100 wrote:
lol. The spurs tanked properly? And we didn't?
The teams that gutted their entire core now have 4-6th picks and this success?
Cmon man, even for you this is pretty bad.
The spurs had no business being down where they were. They literally sat key guys and tanked down the stretch. They did the opposite of what we did.
I'm relieved the tank thread is dead for this next year. This is just strange at this point.


720 wrote:Duffman100 wrote:XTC wrote:It was a fun ride brothers.
Tired of arguing with these fake casuals who think it might be better to win fake games than tank properly.
I'm here for the ride, I'm here for mediocrity.
The teams that tanked properly aren't in the top 3.
So...
Sixers tanked properly and are 3rd. All the other teams that tanked properly with worse records than us have higher picks than us (Wizards, Jazz, Hornets, Nets, all have higher picks than us). Spurs tanked properly and got down to 8th best odds (which they had to tank to get down to) to then move up.
PushDaRock wrote:720 wrote:Duffman100 wrote:
The teams that tanked properly aren't in the top 3.
So...
Sixers tanked properly and are 3rd. All the other teams that tanked properly with worse records than us have higher picks than us (Wizards, Jazz, Hornets, Nets, all have higher picks than us). Spurs tanked properly and got down to 8th best odds (which they had to tank to get down to) to then move up.
lmao are you seriously trying to tell me the Spurs were tanking harder than us?



720 wrote:Duffman100 wrote:XTC wrote:It was a fun ride brothers.
Tired of arguing with these fake casuals who think it might be better to win fake games than tank properly.
I'm here for the ride, I'm here for mediocrity.
The teams that tanked properly aren't in the top 3.
So...
Sixers tanked properly and are 3rd. All the other teams that tanked properly with worse records than us have higher picks than us (Wizards, Jazz, Hornets, Nets, all have higher picks than us). Spurs tanked properly and got down to 8th best odds (which they had to tank to get down to) to then move up.
