Michael Lucky wrote:SOUL wrote:Michael Lucky wrote:Small market teams represent 2/3rds of ownership while the remaining 1/3rd is responsible for most of the revenue. Doesn't take a genius to understand the politics of this.
This doesn't answer anything I said though lol. So you're saying that any trade/result can be called rigging if it makes sense?
 
If you have logical reason for explaining something that would happen in a vacuum in 1 of only 10 million scenarios, then it is common sense in following that reasoning. Again, this is the first time I've ever believed that the lottery is rigged but I can no longer ignore the obvious results that would lead any logical person to believe that it is. Again you never get 87% of people to believe something is rigged without clear and logical evidence that points to it. After all conspiracy theorists are again and again ignored for good reason by the majority. Point is i feel like I can no longer ignore it if the results keep slapping me in the face.
 
1 in 10 million scenarios? I just pressed the Tankathon sim button ONCE and guess who got the first pick? The Mavs  

 . Then Charlotte. 
Next time, Raptors moved up 6 and got 1st, Kings moved up 11 and got 2nd, 3rd spin was more "normal", 4th spin, Nets got first, Rockets moved up 7, Spurs moved up 6..
It takes just one drawing to get a wonky result. These aren't aggregates. People are getting what they wanted by flattening the odds of tanking because people hated bad teams being bad. 14% odds versus 2% odds isn't some crazy amount.
Hell, Utah had a 48% chance to get the 5th spot, barely less than their 1-4 spots combined.