GelbeWand09 wrote:pepe1991 wrote:GelbeWand09 wrote:Aha, and the billionaire owners of the Wizards, Hornets & co just say every year take those Superstars, we are fine. We dont need star players like the last 2-4 decades before already.

It depends how you view those teams.
In past 40 years (lottery erea) Wizards nor Hornets ever made moves that were basketball moves, or that make any basketball sense.
Their owners aren't there to fight for titles, they are there to maximize profit. They
probably make more money when Lakers are champions than when they are in playoffs. Needless to say, they are fine with having terrible teams year in and year out.
Hornets are without playoffs for 9 years straight, on East. Wizards missed playoffs 6 out of last 7 times.
From NBA value, both teams are irrelevant, owners just fall in line, operate like it's another company and ignore sporting aspects of it. It's foolish to think those guys have much emotional investments in teams. Hornets owner used to be shareholder of Hawks. They are people heavily involved in politics, money flaws, transactions. It's just another investment. Like any multi million dollar job, you have rules to follow, don't ask questions, just stay in your line.
No team wants to be irrelevant for 20-40 years
- If they don't care about winning, they're still interested in money and stars bring money. Those guys dont watch other owners get more money because of success and stars just because they make still profit. They woudnt be billionaires if they think so.
- Teams like Sacramento, Indiana & co always want to win and they are still ok with never winning the lottery and those stars go to the other teams around them?
- Orlando was OK being the worst or 2nd worst team over a full decade record wise and never winning the lottery or even jumping in the top 3 despite them making win now moves and hiring win now coaches?
- Teams are ok that the Cavs win the lottery 3 times in 4 years after having the priviledge of having LeBron for 7-8 years?
- Then why does the NBA allow a 20 year conference imbalance when they could distribute the stars better per draft?
- How come that it never comes out with so many ex GMs and owners? completely unrealistic
- quasi-banned owners and GM's like Sterling & Morey don't say anything either?
- Other teams are ok with the fact that teams that had real superstars and then often lose them due to incompetence immediately get the next real superstar even though half of the remaining teams don't have a real superstar and some of them haven't had one for ages?
1) Wizards and Hornets have/had stars. Wall 1# pick, Beal 3# pick, Lamelo 3#, Miller 2#
It's not about having or not having star, it's about optimizing profit. Once you figure
everybody makes more money if major market team is champion, you not being champion (because, let's face it, you suck at basketball nor care too much ) becomes even less relevant to a point where it's not worth bothering.
2) Vivek ( Kings) used to own parts of Warriors. Pacers owner bought team in 1983, team was worthless, previous owner wanted to return team to nba. He bought team for $11M. Why would he care about conspiracies, that team is only serious incom he has.
3) Once again, League as it's best when best player(s) and biggest teams are doing fine. Go run math of probability of Cavs winning lottery
three times in 4 years.
Lebron's exit and Lebron's return both involved 1# picks. Coincidence?
4) why would nba care about conference imbalance? From competitive aspect it's talking point, from money making, it's irrelevant, Western teams are more popular & more watched & have more exclusive games = more competition in one conference = more high market games.
5) It's as unrealistic as every government & president telling 8 billion people to take vaccine that does next to nothing, or stay in home for 3 years, than start pretending it never happened?
What's there for former Gm to gain to say he was part of the show? He will get ridiculed and never work serious job in his life.
Just for sake of argument, Larry Bird told media in 1984 that Stern wanted game 7 of finals because league needed money, pretty much saying commisionair is part of game rigging for money.
6) feel free to find single interview with Sterling post 2014. That's what blacklisting means. Cutting your throat and platform to hear your voice.
7) what's more realistic? Option that in scripted league only 5 teams never won lottery OR that in time frame 1980-2024 - only 13 teams won title (less than half) , and among 44 title winners, 21 titles went to Celtics, LAL & Bulls ?
Look, i don't think everything is scripted, but i do think that league has shady ways to compensate on surface illogical, irrational trades.
League that allows nba player to have his own agency of players is all but regular league.
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon