People were interested in these podcasts
Play Episode
53min
RealGM Radio
Thunder Win Championship, Haliburton's Injury, Kevin Durant Trade Fallout and NBA Draft "My Guys" With Adam Mares
Wes Goldberg and Adam Mares (DNVR Sports, All NBA Podcast) break down the Oklahoma City Thunder's championship victory, Sam Presti's roster construction and Shai Gilgeous-Alexander's superstar ascension. Then they talk about Tyrese Haliburton's injury and its impact on the Pacers future, Kevin Durant getting traded to the Houston Rockets and the Denver Nuggets' plan for the offseason before diving into their "My Guys" in the NBA Draft. Timestamps 0:00 Intro: OKC wins the Finals 20:15 Haliburton's injury 27:15 Kevin Durant traded 33:58 Denver Nuggets offseason changes 35:00 Favorite NBA Draft prospects RealGM Radio is powered in part by North Station Media (CLNS). For advertising or media inquiries, contact info@clnsmedia.com 🔔 Like, comment, and subscribe for more NBA insights and analysis! Follow RealGM Twitter: https://x.com/RealGM Follow Wes Goldberg Twitter: https://x.com/wcgoldberg PrizePicks: PrizePicks is the best place to get real money sports action. With over 10 million members and billions of dollars in awarded winnings, PrizePicks has made daily fantasy sports accessible to all. You just pick MORE or LESS on at least two players for a shot to win up to 1000x your cash! Run Your Game all season long on PrizePicks. Download the app today and use code CLNS to get $50 instantly after you play your first $5 lineup! Gametime: Take the guesswork out of buying tickets with Gametime. Download the Gametime app, create an account, and use code CLNS for $20 off your first purchase. #nba #shaigilgeousalexander #sga #okcthunder #denvernuggets #pacers #tyresehaliburton #kevindurant Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
RealGM Radio
NBA Finals X-Factors Draft with Mike Shearer
Will Tyrese Haliburton find answers against the OKLAHOMA CITY THUNDER's defense? Host Wes Goldberg and guest Mike Shearer break down the critical elements that could swing the NBA Finals with their X Factor draft. From Haliburton's jump pass to the Pacers' tendency to foul, no stone is left unturned. The duo analyzes the coaching chess match between Rick Carlisle and Mark Daigneault, explores the impact of physicality, and debates how mid-range shooting might shape the series outcome. Discover why the PACERS might have a better chance than many think. Timestamps 0:00 Intro: X Factor draft for NBA Finals preview 5:07 Halliburton's possession and Thunder's defense 10:12 Importance of Halliburton jump pass 15:09 Corner threes and half-court offense dynamics 20:18 Shai Gilgeous-Alexander's offensive impact and free throws 26:30 Turnover battle and possession advantage 31:19 Mid-range shooting prevalence in Finals matchup 37:29 Coaching strategies and staff contributions 43:08 Physicality and referee impact on series 48:49 Basketball lineage and celebrity factor 54:08 Closing thoughts on series competitiveness RealGM Radio is powered in part by North Station Media (CLNS). For advertising or media inquiries, contact info@clnsmedia.com 🔔 Like, comment, and subscribe for more NBA insights and analysis! Follow RealGM Twitter: https://x.com/RealGM Follow Wes Goldberg Twitter: https://x.com/wcgoldberg PrizePicks: PrizePicks is the best place to get real money sports action. With over 10 million members and billions of dollars in awarded winnings, PrizePicks has made daily fantasy sports accessible to all. You just pick MORE or LESS on at least two players for a shot to win up to 1000x your cash! Run Your Game all season long on PrizePicks. Download the app today and use code CLNS to get $50 instantly after you play your first $5 lineup! Gametime: Take the guesswork out of buying tickets with Gametime. Download the Gametime app, create an account, and use code CLNS f
RealGM Radio
Can the NBA Copy the OKC Thunder's Blueprint? (With Esfandiar Baraheni)
Is the Oklahoma City Thunder's defense the best we've ever seen in the NBA playoffs? With standout performances from Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and Chet Holmgren, the Thunder's defensive dominance fueled their run to the NBA Finals. This episode explores their strategic dominance, the Minnesota Timberwolves' future challenges, and intriguing off-season trade possibilities. Wes Goldberg and Esfandiar Baraheni dissect the Thunder's unique defensive tactics and speculate on potential trade targets like Jaren Jackson Jr. and Trae Young. The conversation also touches on the Timberwolves' need to adapt with aging stars like Rudy Gobert. Timestamps 0:00 Intro 1:00 Thunder's defensive dominance 18:30 Best defense we've ever seen? 29:00 Timberwolves offseason questions 40:00 Under-the-radar offseason trade targets RealGM Radio is powered in part by North Station Media (CLNS). For advertising or media inquiries, contact info@clnsmedia.com 🔔 Like, comment, and subscribe for more NBA insights and analysis! Follow RealGM Twitter: https://x.com/RealGM Follow Wes Goldberg Twitter: https://x.com/wcgoldberg PrizePicks: PrizePicks is the best place to get real money sports action. With over 10 million members and billions of dollars in awarded winnings, PrizePicks has made daily fantasy sports accessible to all. You just pick MORE or LESS on at least two players for a shot to win up to 1000x your cash! Run Your Game all season long on PrizePicks. Download the app today and use code CLNS to get $50 instantly after you play your first $5 lineup! Gametime: Take the guesswork out of buying tickets with Gametime. Download the Gametime app, create an account, and use code CLNS for $20 off your first purchase. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
RealGM Radio
Pacers Go Up 2-1 in NBA Finals
Wes Goldberg shares his takeaways and observations from the Indiana Pacers' win over the Oklahoma City Thunder in Game 3 of the NBA Finals, including Tyrese Haliburton's aggressiveness, the Pacers' defensive adjustments and where Shai Gilgeous-Alexander fell short. RealGM Radio is powered in part by North Station Media (CLNS). For advertising or media inquiries, contact info@clnsmedia.com 🔔 Like, comment, and subscribe for more NBA insights and analysis! Follow RealGM Twitter: https://x.com/RealGM Follow Wes Goldberg Twitter: https://x.com/wcgoldberg PrizePicks: PrizePicks is the best place to get real money sports action. With over 10 million members and billions of dollars in awarded winnings, PrizePicks has made daily fantasy sports accessible to all. You just pick MORE or LESS on at least two players for a shot to win up to 1000x your cash! Run Your Game all season long on PrizePicks. Download the app today and use code CLNS to get $50 instantly after you play your first $5 lineup! Gametime: Take the guesswork out of buying tickets with Gametime. Download the Gametime app, create an account, and use code CLNS for $20 off your first purchase. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
ImageImageImageImageImage

2025 NBA Draft Discussion Part 6

Moderators: Morris_Shatford, 7 Footer, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX

User avatar
WuTang_OG
RealGM
Posts: 40,315
And1: 50,633
Joined: Sep 26, 2017
   

Re: 2025 NBA Draft Discussion Part 6 

Post#1921 » by WuTang_OG » Wed May 14, 2025 12:19 am

As mentioned above, eight teams still had a chance to win the No. 1 pick before the last ball came out, but the Spurs had three potential outs. They had two extra because they won the Hawks’ pick this year from the Dejounte Murray trade. Here is the number, if it came out, that would have given each team the No. 1 pick:

Pelicans: 2; Nets: 3; Raptors: 4; Spurs: 5; Blazers: 6; Mavericks: 7; Bulls: 8; Kings: 9; Spurs (via the Hawks odds): 12 and 13.

Out came 7, and the Spurs had to settle for the second pick when another run of high numbers (12, 13, 11, 5) came out in their favor.
bboyskinnylegs
RealGM
Posts: 43,482
And1: 26,014
Joined: Jul 11, 2009

Re: 2025 NBA Draft Discussion Part 6 

Post#1922 » by bboyskinnylegs » Wed May 14, 2025 12:21 am

I think Tre is going to fun for whoever gets him.
User avatar
WuTang_OG
RealGM
Posts: 40,315
And1: 50,633
Joined: Sep 26, 2017
   

Re: 2025 NBA Draft Discussion Part 6 

Post#1923 » by WuTang_OG » Wed May 14, 2025 12:24 am

I hope Philly takes Ace and he busts
User avatar
nowayguy
Senior
Posts: 723
And1: 774
Joined: Apr 10, 2011

Re: 2025 NBA Draft Discussion Part 6 

Post#1924 » by nowayguy » Wed May 14, 2025 12:28 am

Tre Johnson went 7 for 11 dunking and 60% at the rim on lower volume. The vertical doesn't translate in any functional way offensively.

Never forget Joe Wieskamp had a 42 inch max vertical.
User avatar
WuTang_OG
RealGM
Posts: 40,315
And1: 50,633
Joined: Sep 26, 2017
   

Re: 2025 NBA Draft Discussion Part 6 

Post#1925 » by WuTang_OG » Wed May 14, 2025 12:33 am

User avatar
Clutch0z24
General Manager
Posts: 9,713
And1: 9,790
Joined: May 08, 2014
   

Re: 2025 NBA Draft Discussion Part 6 

Post#1926 » by Clutch0z24 » Wed May 14, 2025 12:35 am

Grew wrote:
PushDaRock wrote:
Grew wrote:
Well combine just isn't all that important compared to actual playstyle. Queen only had something like 3 less dunks than Fleming despite fleming being a long athletic type. Queen can get himself to the hoop, Fleming needs you to spoonfeed him an easy closeout to attack or pass to him wide open in the dunkers spot.


Not sure why you're comparing him to Fleming or how it's relevant since they play nothing alike.

His play style is exactly why there is concern, it's questionable how it translates over. He doesn't shoot well, is a bit undersized, unathletic and is going to need to score over NBA athletes that are way more athletic and longer than him.


Comparing him to Fleming because he's the prototype long athlete. Queen has all these athletic concerns in the combine yet he dunks the ball as much as the long athlete type people think can play smallball 5.


Ppl get too hyped on Measurements/Atheltic Abilities way too much in the drafting process....These things are not as big of a deal when you realize these are basketball players and not Olympic athletes or high jumpers....They matter to a certain extent....

What matters more to scouts/gms are what translates on the basketball court....And how good they look in a 5 on 5 setting....Masai will see all these guys in workouts how good they are at the game of basketball....And a guy like Queen is not going to wow you as an athlete but as soon as you see him in games in a 5 vs 5 setting you realize he is 1 step better than the athletic types because of his basketball skills + IQ...

These measurments and athletic tests mean nothing to me personally....What matters is how they look on the court...Not in an open gym but in a 5 vs 5 setting...Thats all that really matters at the end of the day.
Image
User avatar
WuTang_OG
RealGM
Posts: 40,315
And1: 50,633
Joined: Sep 26, 2017
   

Re: 2025 NBA Draft Discussion Part 6 

Post#1927 » by WuTang_OG » Wed May 14, 2025 12:38 am

User avatar
niQ
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 15,970
And1: 29,813
Joined: Jun 14, 2011

Re: 2025 NBA Draft Discussion Part 6 

Post#1928 » by niQ » Wed May 14, 2025 12:43 am

Read on Twitter
?s=19
User avatar
Duffman100
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 47,465
And1: 71,659
Joined: Jun 27, 2002
   

Re: 2025 NBA Draft Discussion Part 6 

Post#1929 » by Duffman100 » Wed May 14, 2025 12:44 am

Jace is low key performing well. Guy is going to be good.
Tripod
RealGM
Posts: 11,249
And1: 10,988
Joined: Aug 13, 2021
 

Re: 2025 NBA Draft Discussion Part 6 

Post#1930 » by Tripod » Wed May 14, 2025 12:46 am

Duffman100 wrote:Jace is low key performing well. Guy is going to be good.

I am abeliever, despite his actual height being really low.
User avatar
Clutch0z24
General Manager
Posts: 9,713
And1: 9,790
Joined: May 08, 2014
   

Re: 2025 NBA Draft Discussion Part 6 

Post#1931 » by Clutch0z24 » Wed May 14, 2025 12:49 am

Duffman100 wrote:Jace is low key performing well. Guy is going to be good.


He has to become a legit PG and we would have to develop him to be able to run the team but i would not be mad if we pick him at 9th....His basketball skills are not a question at all....He is high up there on my board at 9 if no one falls to you that you like....Also NBA dad so you know he was taught to play the right way.
Image
User avatar
CazOnReal
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,989
And1: 1,554
Joined: Jan 13, 2024
 

Re: 2025 NBA Draft Discussion Part 6 

Post#1932 » by CazOnReal » Wed May 14, 2025 12:53 am

So thus far I guess this is where I stand on the guys who could be available at 9:

Happy with

Khaman Malauch: Poeltl replacement in the long-term, a feel-good story in the short-term given the f*cked up situation he's in. You can shout BPA over fit all you want but I think at 9 there's a very strong argument to be made it's either Queen or Malauch who are the best players on the board. It just depends on what skills you value that make one or the other the "best".

Derik Queen: The measurements more or less lock him into playing PF in my view which...probably for the best given his skillset. I like the fit with him and Scottie but that's under the basis that one or both develops an outside shot because while I think Queen's an underrated passer, I think there's only so much Barnes can do to cover up the presumed defensive issues Derik will have. Still, a bucket's a bucket and DQ can get those in droves on relatively decent efficiency.

Rasheer Fleming: That wingspan is fu*king ridiculous. Full stop. Almost as long as Malauch as a wing. His offense does leave me concerned, mind.

Top prospect that falls to us: A la Clingan last year, Gradey the year before or...do we still think Cam Whitmore is that great? Either way, BPA might just involve a few teams overthinking X or Y prospect. I'm personally skeptical Fears will fall to us (And frankly if you think Quickley isn't the future PG then I have news for you: Fears and Quickley have more or less the same AST/TO ratio with 1.2:1 and 1.19:1 respectively) but Dick Fears as a lineup is fun.

Neutral

Carter Bryant: Yup, that's a 3 & D wing alright...if you ignore the FT%. The turnovers are also really bad for someone who'd be on a pass-heavy team like Toronto. I think he's very much a "trade down" candidate rather than someone you take at 9 and feel good about but talking about trading up or down is a lot easier than, you know, making that deal. I'm pretty sure the Wizards moved up one spot and the Pacers only got 2 seconds out of it anyway so...big mileage may vary as to how likely this FO is to make such a move when they've literally never done that.

Kasparas Jakucionis: Turnovers, turnovers, turnovers. I get a lot of people aren't sold on Quickley as the team's future PG or feel he's better suited to SG but him and Fears both worry me when it comes to being the floor general.

Noa Essengue: Probably the one draftee where their youth worries me because I do wonder if they'll be able to contribute to the rotation in their first year. He's in that "Can't teach size" camp like Fleming where the measurements can make you overlook the big questions around them minus the absurd wingspan.

Asa Newell: Another "in the trade down" category. High floor but the ceiling is...I dunno, bigger Onyeka Okongwu i.e. "is he a center or a PF"?

Dislike
CMB: The shooting is a huge red flag, he's not an elite athlete and his defense is not so good that he's worth burning a Top 10 pick on.

Jase Richardson: PG-sized without much passing. Yeah, hard pass.

Egor Demin: It was between neutral and dislike and I guess i'm in a hating mood.

Going to do a deeper dive into each but that's how I feel at the moment.
User avatar
CazOnReal
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,989
And1: 1,554
Joined: Jan 13, 2024
 

Re: 2025 NBA Draft Discussion Part 6 

Post#1933 » by CazOnReal » Wed May 14, 2025 12:54 am

Duffman100 wrote:Jace is low key performing well. Guy is going to be good.

Did he learn to pass while I wasn't looking?
User avatar
Clutch0z24
General Manager
Posts: 9,713
And1: 9,790
Joined: May 08, 2014
   

Re: 2025 NBA Draft Discussion Part 6 

Post#1934 » by Clutch0z24 » Wed May 14, 2025 12:58 am

CazOnReal wrote:So thus far I guess this is where I stand on the guys who could be available at 9:

Happy with

Khaman Malauch: Poeltl replacement in the long-term, a feel-good story in the short-term given the f*cked up situation he's in. You can shout BPA over fit all you want but I think at 9 there's a very strong argument to be made it's either Queen or Malauch who are the best players on the board. It just depends on what skills you value that make one or the other the "best".

Derik Queen: The measurements more or less lock him into playing PF in my view which...probably for the best given his skillset. I like the fit with him and Scottie but that's under the basis that one or both develops an outside shot because while I think Queen's an underrated passer, I think there's only so much Barnes can do to cover up the presumed defensive issues Derik will have. Still, a bucket's a bucket and DQ can get those in droves on relatively decent efficiency.

Rasheer Fleming: That wingspan is fu*king ridiculous. Full stop. Almost as long as Malauch as a wing. His offense does leave me concerned, mind.

Top prospect that falls to us: A la Clingan last year, Gradey the year before or...do we still think Cam Whitmore is that great? Either way, BPA might just involve a few teams overthinking X or Y prospect. I'm personally skeptical Fears will fall to us (And frankly if you think Quickley isn't the future PG then I have news for you: Fears and Quickley have more or less the same AST/TO ratio with 1.2:1 and 1.19:1 respectively) but Dick Fears as a lineup is fun.

Neutral

Carter Bryant: Yup, that's a 3 & D wing alright...if you ignore the FT%. The turnovers are also really bad for someone who'd be on a pass-heavy team like Toronto. I think he's very much a "trade down" candidate rather than someone you take at 9 and feel good about but talking about trading up or down is a lot easier than, you know, making that deal. I'm pretty sure the Wizards moved up one spot and the Pacers only got 2 seconds out of it anyway so...big mileage may vary as to how likely this FO is to make such a move when they've literally never done that.

Kasparas Jakucionis: Turnovers, turnovers, turnovers. I get a lot of people aren't sold on Quickley as the team's future PG or feel he's better suited to SG but him and Fears both worry me when it comes to being the floor general.

Noa Essengue: Probably the one draftee where their youth worries me because I do wonder if they'll be able to contribute to the rotation in their first year. He's in that "Can't teach size" camp like Fleming where the measurements can make you overlook the big questions around them minus the absurd wingspan.

Asa Newell: Another "in the trade down" category. High floor but the ceiling is...I dunno, bigger Onyeka Okongwu i.e. "is he a center or a PF"?

Dislike
CMB: The shooting is a huge red flag, he's not an elite athlete and his defense is not so good that he's worth burning a Top 10 pick on.

Jase Richardson: PG-sized without much passing. Yeah, hard pass.

Egor Demin: It was between neutral and dislike and I guess i'm in a hating mood.

Going to do a deeper dive into each but that's how I feel at the moment.


Good list but i have a feeling both Maluach/Queen have a chance to be gone by 9th....I think its possible they go 6/7th and Fears falls to 8th and we have to choose Jak/Kon Or go off board with another guy Masai likes like Flemming...But yeah one of the Bigs to fall to us would be ideal...
Image
User avatar
UnbelievablyRAW
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,581
And1: 4,372
Joined: Oct 29, 2011
     

Re: 2025 NBA Draft Discussion Part 6 

Post#1935 » by UnbelievablyRAW » Wed May 14, 2025 1:06 am

CazOnReal wrote:So thus far I guess this is where I stand on the guys who could be available at 9:

Happy with


Egor Demin: It was between neutral and dislike and I guess i'm in a hating mood.

Going to do a deeper dive into each but that's how I feel at the moment.


I feel like Kasp would be best utilized as a Derrick White/Nembhard type guard who can initiate sets but mostly plays with another ball handler. I think our offense is a bit more egalitarian and pass heavy than a traditional offense which is why we have so many assists in the last few years. I feel like you could argue if he didn't come back after the forearm injury in January, he'd still be mocked top 8

Demin I've felt the same way you have but his passing is real (with less turnovers) and he is much larger. If he can be developed he might have a pathway to be Giddey which allows for some lineup versatility. Not good enough to be taken 8, more of a guy that can be targeted around 20 if we can re enter the first round.
"Above average role player is now being paid like a superstar from one good playoff series. This will end up as one of the worst contracts in the league." paulbball on Pascal Siakam
PushDaRock
RealGM
Posts: 12,222
And1: 9,408
Joined: Jun 22, 2011

Re: 2025 NBA Draft Discussion Part 6 

Post#1936 » by PushDaRock » Wed May 14, 2025 1:06 am

Clutch0z24 wrote:
Grew wrote:
PushDaRock wrote:
Not sure why you're comparing him to Fleming or how it's relevant since they play nothing alike.

His play style is exactly why there is concern, it's questionable how it translates over. He doesn't shoot well, is a bit undersized, unathletic and is going to need to score over NBA athletes that are way more athletic and longer than him.


Comparing him to Fleming because he's the prototype long athlete. Queen has all these athletic concerns in the combine yet he dunks the ball as much as the long athlete type people think can play smallball 5.


Ppl get too hyped on Measurements/Atheltic Abilities way too much in the drafting process....These things are not as big of a deal when you realize these are basketball players and not Olympic athletes or high jumpers....They matter to a certain extent....

What matters more to scouts/gms are what translates on the basketball court....And how good they look in a 5 on 5 setting....Masai will see all these guys in workouts how good they are at the game of basketball....And a guy like Queen is not going to wow you as an athlete but as soon as you see him in games in a 5 vs 5 setting you realize he is 1 step better than the athletic types because of his basketball skills + IQ...

These measurments and athletic tests mean nothing to me personally....What matters is how they look on the court...Not in an open gym but in a 5 vs 5 setting...Thats all that really matters at the end of the day.


I don't expect him to wow anyone with his athleticism but testing out bottom tier like this does not help his outlook in any way. I posted the list of his comparables in testing, it wasn't a list you want to be on. Maybe he's an outlier and can overcome the physical limitations but history tells us these things do tend to matter.
User avatar
niQ
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 15,970
And1: 29,813
Joined: Jun 14, 2011

Re: 2025 NBA Draft Discussion Part 6 

Post#1937 » by niQ » Wed May 14, 2025 1:06 am

Read on Twitter
?s=19
MoneyBall
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,313
And1: 3,686
Joined: May 02, 2009

Re: 2025 NBA Draft Discussion Part 6 

Post#1938 » by MoneyBall » Wed May 14, 2025 1:09 am

Dalek wrote:
TGM wrote:
Dalek wrote:I still am in awe of Jaku's numbers:
6’4 ¾ barefoot, 205.2 lbs with a 6’7 ¾" wingspan and 8’4" standing reach

Dylan's Harper by comparison:
6’4 1/2 barefoot, 213.2 lbs with a 6’10 ½" wingspan and 8’6" standing reach

Considering he shot similarly on threes and is likely a better passer it isn't a terrible fallback at 9.

My guy Will Riley gained weight since last year. Riley at 6’8 ¼ barefoot, 185.6 lbs with a 6’8 ¾" wingspan and 8’8” standing reach is gaining momentum for me. He has star upside if he can add the weight to his frame. If we trade out of 9 he is a worthy pick.


This guy is a baby Luka. The 3pt % are a bit deceiving, because he also had to take a lot of forced shots and was consistently the focal point of the offense. Key thing is he can create and break down defenses. Something IQ is not good at. As much as we have paid big money for IQ last off season, the dude needs to be traded. People will realize in two years that he is the bottleneck for this team.


I do see what you mean by "Baby Luka." I think many European guards idolize Luka because he is a superstar and try to emulate his signature moves. Jaku drives me a bit nuts with it, because he seems to only resort to step-back in game. It is a weird shot diet.

Still, if he irons out the shot, he can possibly be a starter. He is not a weak guard, has great footwork and shifty handle, and is not afraid of contact. He reminds me most of Goran Dragic but his downside is that of Greivis Vasquez.

Wow, Dragic is literally *the* guy I had in mind as my best comparison for Jaku... a taller version, of course.
User avatar
Clutch0z24
General Manager
Posts: 9,713
And1: 9,790
Joined: May 08, 2014
   

Re: 2025 NBA Draft Discussion Part 6 

Post#1939 » by Clutch0z24 » Wed May 14, 2025 1:09 am

PushDaRock wrote:
Clutch0z24 wrote:
Grew wrote:
Comparing him to Fleming because he's the prototype long athlete. Queen has all these athletic concerns in the combine yet he dunks the ball as much as the long athlete type people think can play smallball 5.


Ppl get too hyped on Measurements/Atheltic Abilities way too much in the drafting process....These things are not as big of a deal when you realize these are basketball players and not Olympic athletes or high jumpers....They matter to a certain extent....

What matters more to scouts/gms are what translates on the basketball court....And how good they look in a 5 on 5 setting....Masai will see all these guys in workouts how good they are at the game of basketball....And a guy like Queen is not going to wow you as an athlete but as soon as you see him in games in a 5 vs 5 setting you realize he is 1 step better than the athletic types because of his basketball skills + IQ...

These measurments and athletic tests mean nothing to me personally....What matters is how they look on the court...Not in an open gym but in a 5 vs 5 setting...Thats all that really matters at the end of the day.


I don't expect him to wow anyone with his athleticism but testing out bottom tier like this does not help his outlook in any way. I posted the list of his comparables in testing, it wasn't a list you want to be on. Maybe he's an outlier and can overcome the physical limitations but history tells us these things do tend to matter.


I judge the players with what they do on the court and how they look in a 5 vs 5 setting....That matters to me more than how high a player can jump....You don't need to be an athlete to be a good smart basketball player....Does it help to be athletic sure...But its not something that defines you as a basketball player...
Image
PushDaRock
RealGM
Posts: 12,222
And1: 9,408
Joined: Jun 22, 2011

Re: 2025 NBA Draft Discussion Part 6 

Post#1940 » by PushDaRock » Wed May 14, 2025 1:09 am

Duffman100 wrote:Jace is low key performing well. Guy is going to be good.


Was my fav prospect leading up to the combine, damn hard to overlook his height though unless Masai thinks he can be a PG or at the very least a combo guard. I do think he plays much bigger than his height out there.

Return to Toronto Raptors