Post#23 » by Iwasawitness » Wed May 14, 2025 3:06 am
To the people saying they should move on from Garland... how?
Cleveland is now going to be a second apron team. Making trades, especially for a player like Garland, is going to be extremely difficult. Contracts have to match no matter what. And it's not like you want to get rid him entirely either, his playmaking and off ball play is extremely valuable. Mitchell can't run an offense the way he can.
So, if we can't make these kinds of moves then what do we do? Well, I have a few ideas...
1. We could put Hunter in the starting lineup. A trio of Hunter/Mobley/Allen is pretty deadly from a size standpoint. And it would be nice to have another player out there who can create their own shot opportunities like Hunter can. The obvious drawback with this is that you are killing your depth, as we are operating under the assumption that Jerome and Merrill both sign elsewhere this season (although if I'm Cleveland, I'm doing everything I can to retain their services).
2. A friend of mine actually suggested this to me, and I find it very intriguing. Start Mobley at center, have Allen be his backup, and create arguably the best center rotation in the NBA. The obvious issue with this is whether or not Mobley is ready to make that transition to being a full time center yet, and you are also taking away your two seven footers who can guard out at the perimeter to help make up for the two small guards. Even if you take Hunter and move him to the four, you are still creating a situation where the Cavaliers are pretty easy to pick apart at the perimeter.
3. I personally think this is the best route to go... you do the same thing as above but with Garland/Mitchell, where Mitchell starts and Garland is his backup, especially if you lose Jerome. Strus is better suited being your starting two guard anyways, and you can still go with Hunter as your starting SF if you wanted. And even if you manage to lose Jerome and Merrill, you are still left with a bench unit of Garland/Okoro/Tyson/Wade. The only issue with this is that Mitchell is simply not a natural PG. And while he may be a talented passer, he can't run an offense like Garland can. But we also can't deny that a Darius Garland coming off the bench would be pretty deadly, and that the Cavaliers are much better defensively when the two small guards don't play together.
LakerLegend wrote:LeBron was literally more athletic at 35 than he was at 20