ontnut wrote:SirKen wrote:billy_hoyle wrote:
This.
Do people not understand statistics?
To work backwards and re-create a specific outcome is going to look like astronomically small odds when you start with a 1.8% chance winning.
That's the hard part, but it's a possibility. We only had what? 5x the chance (or 6% more). Would it be rigged if we won? Collectively there was a ~15% chance that we were getting jumped by at least two teams above us in the standings.
Do people not understand how billion dollar businesses work?
The probability of the order of 3 teams being anything like WAS, UTA, CHA was a BIG FAT ZERO, does not matter what the math tells you. Talk about math focused stats people missing the context again...
The post below put it perfectly.
viewtopic.php?p=118539730#p118539730
So you're just saying it's rigged and the odds don't matter, right?
I wouldn't put it past them and this year's results def look sus AF.
Yes and they don't have to rig all the small things all the time, right? It is likely that they would intervene whenever there is a big risk or a massive profit opportunity for the league.
Just "follow the money"