CptCrunch wrote:This guy just remind me of Aaron Brooks for some reason, probably with that floater they both like.
Small guard gonna peak at 20/5 in the best case without being able to play defense. Not gonna be that high impact of a player as I don't rate him as some cerebral passer.
As a high end outcome, he will be a low tier starter point guard, think 20th best point guard considering the defensive side of ball.
Realistically, he is probably closer to a 6th man bench point guard in a above median development case.
Teams rather sign a vet to play the point as opposed to hand reigns to a mediocre rookie PG prospect. There are not enough minutes for Pettiford to fail here in the league.
Come to think of it, which team in the league like to run undersized midget guards from their bench scorer position? Say aye if your team does.
If Pettiford was 4 inches taller and 40 lbs heavier. He would be a top 5 pick. Sad reality of life.
I really like this take as the yin to my yang view of him being a solid starting PG as a ceiling. And I don’t even think its a bad outlook for Tahaad, Brooks had a really good basketball career… 10 years in nba, couple hundred starts, but never a “good” starter consistently.
I still have him as a better prospect than Brooks, but thats a good comp in my opinion. And if he can fit even some of the roles that a Brooks, Schroder, Jennings, poor mans Conley (as the ceiling), etc have filled, I think thats worthy of a 1st round pick. One i’d love for my team (Warriors) to get in the mix for since they desperately need a PG off the bench and for the future.