Always remember, Tyrese Haliburton was my number one pick. I wrote this, over and over, many times BEFORE that Draft. I repeated the mantra. This board dismissed Hali.
Jase Richardson is our guy at number 12 (if he's available). But y'all are dismissing him anyway.
NBA DRAFT LOTTERY GT, 12 MAY 2025, 6 PM CT, CHICAGO, ESPN
Moderators: HomoSapien, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man
Re: NBA DRAFT LOTTERY GT, 12 MAY 2025, 6 PM CT, CHICAGO, ESPN
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,507
- And1: 1,451
- Joined: Jun 14, 2016
Re: NBA DRAFT LOTTERY GT, 12 MAY 2025, 6 PM CT, CHICAGO, ESPN
- Red Larrivee
- RealGM
- Posts: 42,228
- And1: 19,066
- Joined: Feb 15, 2007
- Location: Hogging Microphone Time From Tom Dore
Re: NBA DRAFT LOTTERY GT, 12 MAY 2025, 6 PM CT, CHICAGO, ESPN
nomorezorro wrote:sco wrote:I would love to have nabbed Hali instead, but I'm not mad at the PWill pick. They went for a high ceiling guy, but it was a high-risk/high-reward swing that missed. Those usually miss, but if you hit, it changes the franchise trajectory. I got more upset when the prior regime went for perceived high floor guys in Carter and Douggy.
the fact that williams busted and haliburton turned into a star kind of underscores how misguided the traditional framing of "high ceiling" prospects is. haliburton was the safe, solid high-floor/low-ceiling guy in that draft!
i'm fairly certain there are more stars in the league who fit into the haliburton mold of "well, they're good players at the college/international level, but there are physical/athletic limitations that will keep them from being a star in the NBA" than the williams mold of "nothing about their on-court play to this point suggests this person is a high-impact basketball player, but if you squint and look at their physical/athletic attributes you can envision how they could be if everything breaks right"
Finally someone said it. All this revisionist history about Haliburton is ridiculous. He was very much considered a safe, low ceiling prospect and people here were mocking the fact that Paxson would've taken him. There was a time where the criticism was that we didn't take enough high risk prospects.
Taking prospects with favorable median outcomes is a good thing. You can end up with Aldridge and Haliburton instead of Thomas and Williams.
Re: NBA DRAFT LOTTERY GT, 12 MAY 2025, 6 PM CT, CHICAGO, ESPN
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,318
- And1: 11,160
- Joined: Jul 31, 2003
- Location: chicago
Re: NBA DRAFT LOTTERY GT, 12 MAY 2025, 6 PM CT, CHICAGO, ESPN
I liked Hali a lot, too. He was safe with great ceiling imo. Dropping to 12 made no sense. Hard for me to not get behind a guy with high 3P/FT%, handles, elite vision, and crazy length for a PG.
For the record, I think “safe picks are bad picks” is just the goofiest draft cliche. There is nothing safe about drafting a McDermott, Redick or whatever your idea of a safe pick is (3-4Y all-american ncaa stat stuffer type? NBA body?). That’s called a waste of a lotto pick. There are certainly dangerous picks (Poku, Bennett, Wiseman… also LaMelo - until he proved he’s legit talent!).
Any GM who deliberately drafts a ceiling roleplayer in the top-14 should be relieved of his duties. TBF some people thought Doug might translate into a star scorer. Rich man’s Korver. I was not on board at all. I got behind him, being a Bulls fan and all, but him totally busting was no surprise. Truth is, he had PF sandbag feet with SF size, and a midpost game that classically suited the NCAA, not the NBA.
For the record, I think “safe picks are bad picks” is just the goofiest draft cliche. There is nothing safe about drafting a McDermott, Redick or whatever your idea of a safe pick is (3-4Y all-american ncaa stat stuffer type? NBA body?). That’s called a waste of a lotto pick. There are certainly dangerous picks (Poku, Bennett, Wiseman… also LaMelo - until he proved he’s legit talent!).
Any GM who deliberately drafts a ceiling roleplayer in the top-14 should be relieved of his duties. TBF some people thought Doug might translate into a star scorer. Rich man’s Korver. I was not on board at all. I got behind him, being a Bulls fan and all, but him totally busting was no surprise. Truth is, he had PF sandbag feet with SF size, and a midpost game that classically suited the NCAA, not the NBA.
Re: NBA DRAFT LOTTERY GT, 12 MAY 2025, 6 PM CT, CHICAGO, ESPN
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,326
- And1: 6,368
- Joined: Jul 11, 2001
- Location: Yelzenbah!
-
Re: NBA DRAFT LOTTERY GT, 12 MAY 2025, 6 PM CT, CHICAGO, ESPN
MrSparkle wrote:I liked Hali a lot, too. He was safe with great ceiling imo. Dropping to 12 made no sense. Hard for me to not get behind a guy with high 3P/FT%, handles, elite vision, and crazy length for a PG.
For the record, I think “safe picks are bad picks” is just the goofiest draft cliche. There is nothing safe about drafting a McDermott, Redick or whatever your idea of a safe pick is (3-4Y all-american ncaa stat stuffer type? NBA body?). That’s called a waste of a lotto pick. There are certainly dangerous picks (Poku, Bennett, Wiseman… also LaMelo - until he proved he’s legit talent!).
Any GM who deliberately drafts a ceiling roleplayer in the top-14 should be relieved of his duties. TBF some people thought Doug might translate into a star scorer. Rich man’s Korver. I was not on board at all. I got behind him, being a Bulls fan and all, but him totally busting was no surprise. Truth is, he had PF sandbag feet with SF size, and a midpost game that classically suited the NCAA, not the NBA.
You pick up those guys once you built your team.
I want someone who has motivation and a high ceiling.

Re: NBA DRAFT LOTTERY GT, 12 MAY 2025, 6 PM CT, CHICAGO, ESPN
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,698
- And1: 780
- Joined: Oct 29, 2001
Re: NBA DRAFT LOTTERY GT, 12 MAY 2025, 6 PM CT, CHICAGO, ESPN
I think at this point my ideal draft is a trade down to accumulate 2 firsts and get Yaxel and Maxime