Bogyo wrote:sunsbum wrote:calling Booker a bad apple is so **** lame man. A few people on this board really need to stop straw maning book. It’s fine if you’re upset that we won’t trade him but to call him a bad player, empty stats, or attack his character is imaginary low hanging fruit.Bogyo wrote:
Funny that. I might just add quietly, that no matter who is the next coach, if we dont trade the bad apples (KD and Book) noone will listen to him. So whats the point? I could be the coach or the genetically modified lovechild of Auerbach/Jackson/Popovich/Kerr could be the coach, it wouldnt matter.
I just think that KD's character has done too much damage to him as well. We are on the 3rd coach in so many years, and these 2 don't seem to do / execute whatever the championship-pedigree head coach has figured out. Yet the coaches get fired (in KDs case he even had Atkinson fired from BKN - he is doing just fine in Cleveland), and these 2 remain unbothered shooting middys. Boring, frustrating, ineffecitve, and quite frankly just shameful.
I never rooted for KD (especially after he went to GSW), and by now I find it really hard to root for Book (once my favourite), as he just became the carbon copy of that attitude. He is not a bad player or even empty stats - I never said that.
I think you nailed a lot of it. Booker is a different player, it looks, attitude wise. He seems very comfortable losing - comments after games are basically the same. Monotone voice, no emotion "we just have to play better." And Booker and Durant are not complementary players - like you said. Just shooting middies and being good with that.
I think Booker without Durant will be a positive though the record may not show it. Personally, still shipping both off but maybe just moving on from Durant and Beal will get Booker back to where he was before. Granted, if he truly signs that 149/2 extension, he could possibly care even less about winning and just being happy scoring 27ppg and making the ASG.