redslastlaugh wrote:Since Danny Ainge resigned it seems like organizationally we've become a little much too dependent on some analytics that work great on paper, work very good in the regular season and just don't hold up that well in the playoffs. For us to lose two of the three Mazzulla years to teams that were huge underdogs is proof of that.
Honestly, I think we need to play some younger guys next year and let Tatum take his time to make sure he gets right so that we can have another 5 years of contention starting 2026-27. But I really think we're going to have these problems unless we can get a coach who isn't so beholden to some of the basketball concepts that have taken over in the analytics era.
For all the times we see teams have horrific shooting in the most clutch moments and the 25-35 year old statistians who report to Brad/Joe say "that's just shooting variance at the worst possible time" when really it's just heightened stress, pressure and fatigue making misses way more likely. And whether it's us shooting 30% in 2023 Miami, whether it's Harden Rockets missing 26 3pta in a row, whether its going 25-100 to lose game 1 and 2 at home in this series. To the analysts the bad shooting is always just interpreted as unforeseeable bad luck always seeming to happen randomly at the moment of the most pressure and exhaustion....
And so I'd hope we can revise our strategy internally this season, give Joe a chance to grow as a coach, and then next offseason bring in Jeff Van Gundy or somebody like that who is less prisoner of the moment about the 3pt shooting and a bunch of the other stuff
I would like to see some changes offensively but the reality is unless you have an all time great scorer the 3s these days are so integral to scoring.
Look at OKC. All time great regular season and on the void of elimination because they’re to hit many open 3s