KGdaBom wrote:BlacJacMac wrote:minimus wrote:Am I reading it right, that DAL traded Luka despite going into WCF last year. Does it mean that additional profit from playoffs game is not nearly enough to compensate luxury tax? I remember GSW were able to cover some costs of expensive roster by going deep in playoffs, but that was before new CBA
You also have to figure in the contract they would've had to sign Luka to, vs the ones that the Lakers can offer.
I believe Luka was eligible for 5/345 with Dallas, but only 5/229 with LA. That's a massive difference — a 23M/year difference.
 
I know this disparity was designed to help a team keep their own player, but something is wrong with the system. I don't know how to fix it though.
 
It was not well thought out. Or at least it didn't consider the upcoming aprons.
The only way I see it working like its intended is to make any "extra money" not count towards the cap or the tax.
So if the most another team can offer your player is 229, then you can still pay them 345, but it only counts as 229 towards the cap/tax. You're still going to pay the extra 116M to the player, but you won't get penalized because you're player qualified for more money only from you.
Its a mess how it is now. A 
team gets penalized because a player won an 
individual award.
If there is no change, I bet we start seeing upcoming Supermax players traded for each other to save teams money. Like a Banchero for Holmgren trade.