Patsfan1081 wrote:eyeatoma wrote:AussieCeltic wrote:
Was he a cancer on a very bad Washington team? Kind of throws your theory out the window. But you don’t care. You just want to **** on the Celtics every chance you get no matter how little it makes sense.
The Mavs are the only place he had an issue and that’s because he was sick of Luka heliocentric ball.
Let me ask you this. If he was such an incredible player, big character guy, why was he being traded for peanuts?
From Dallas and from Washington. Injury concerns are not the only reason and you know that.
LOL at you telling me that I like to **** on the Celtics every chance I get when you are one of the biggest Embiid haters. The entire board hates on Embiid. Pot meet kettle.
Seems like the issues in Dallas had as much to do with Luca as it did with everything else. Taking a lot of L’s it seems recently with these “anti-Boston” takes.![]()
He starts the interview by saying he could have been more mature... How is that an L?
Luka raises players floors. He obvioulsy has superstar tendenceis, because he's you know a superstar. Far better than Porzingis.
That video shows how dysfunctional the Mavs were. Carlisle didn't do a good job utilising Porzingis, that obviously causes frustrations.
The benefit of being with the Celtics is top down they are an elite organization. I'm not sure about coaching but I've got great respect for Brad Stevens. When you move to an organisation that knows their **** it makes a difference.
Watch the video again and you'll see the first have he mentioned he had a lot of maturing to do. Luka is going to be Luka, but again that's what you get with stars. Fact of the matter is he matured, and he benefits form having a clearly defined role with the Celtics. They also explained the benefits of taking out certain parts of his game and emphasizing other parts. That's what good teams do.