hugepatsfan wrote:For me personally, I feel the new CBA is just furthering what has been the worst impact of the "player empowerment" era. I just don't FEEL IT with any of these matchups anymore. There's no sweat equity in them. There's not the same amount of teams meeting in the playoffs back to back years or three out of 4 years with mostly the same core. The players have been hopping team to team for a while now which was hurting that for me, and now the league basically gave the teams on the other side motivation to tear their teams apart too.
Like I can see why, in a basketball sense, OKC vs. MIN or NYK vs. IND should be fun series. But meh, it's just not compelling for me. And neither was BOS-DAL in the finals last year or BOS-IND/MIN-DAL either. Sure, I was interest because my team was in it, but for quite a while now once the Celtics have been eliminated, I simply don't find the rest of the playoffs compelling enough to really get into. I'll put it on in the background or at least catch highlights and watch a few breakdowns, but I just don't find it super interesting to watch unless I look up while doing other things and see it's close in the 4th quarter.
I don't agree with everything above but I agree with your general point that the NBA CBA is likely going to break up a lot of championship squads and contenders. The NBA isn't the NFL in which fans just root for the jersey and are indifferent to basically everyone on the club but the QB.
NBA fans identify with the players on the roster. I'm very skeptical in the aggregate it will help the NBA if in 2025 the Celtics have to trade core players. The evidence we do have supports the idea fans prefer dynasties in basketball not parity.
And the current CBA is going to lead to more "KG in Minnesota" situations in which an ATG is stuck on a **** team that can't fix itself. We have two of em already in Milwaukee and Denver. It sucks.