ImageImageImageImageImage

2025 NBA Draft Discussion Part 7

Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford

grant101
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,468
And1: 1,077
Joined: Feb 04, 2022
 

Re: 2025 NBA Draft Discussion Part 7 

Post#1581 » by grant101 » Wed May 21, 2025 4:06 pm

Psubs wrote:
JCP11 wrote:
grant101 wrote:Not a fan of drafting CMB given our roster construction (and all the moaning from fans about a lack of spacing that would likely follow), but I’ll say this: if anyone in this draft has the potential to have a Kawhi-like outcome, it’s him. In college, kawhi was an elite defensive playmaker, rebounder, and a great on-ball driver for his size/role. Out of the grouping of forwards folks are talking about (Fleming, Bryant, Essengue), CMB is the only one that checks all those boxes. The stats back this up. Also, like Kawhi, His feel for the game is miles ahead of the others.

Bryant is a fine defender, Fleming is an overrated one, and Essengue is quite bad on defense. Bryant is also the only one that I trust will shoot it well enough to where defenses respect him. Nobody in this grouping has much on ball juice (Fleming is particularly bad here). I don’t buy the idea that any of these guys is a safe pick. IMO, we should be going for upside in the lottery.

For me it's simple, if he develops a shot he's a top 3 player in this draft, the rest of his game is already well advanced for a sophomore. Not a lot of people here wants to wait or bet on him developing his shot to a respectable level because of Scottie and I get it but I would take him regardless and do everything I can to improve his shot. At his size when he gets downhill He's like a mini Zion. He's simply just a very good basketball player.


to Grant

Did you watch him shoot at the combine? He won't become a better shooter from 3 than Draymond. Draymond is a 32% 3pt shooter, which is better than MJ and Kobe! :lol: Though in today's NBA if he's shooting more than a wide open catch and shoot it's hurting the team.

Fleming isn't overrated. He's being mocked in the teens and even in the 20's. Those that like him know that he can be on Bam's level who was drafted 14th. A taller lankier Bam that can shoot 3's might be his ceiling but damn, that's insane. Maybe a shorter Serge Ibaka that can guard 3-5?


Yeah, I watched him shoot, and it's not pretty. He's a decent ft shooter and has good touch down low, so I'm not ruling it out however. Kawhi and Draymond were also pretty poor shooters in college. I don't think it ever becomes a strength, but I see a world where it becomes respectable.

As for Fleming, I disagree. His jumper looks funky to me, and he shot meh on mostly catch-and shoot looks. On defence, his stats are OK, he moves his feet well enough, and he has the frame to be impactful, but he gets spacey off ball and I just don't see the high-level defender that folks keep suggesting. He'll be able to hang defensively, but players like CMB are legit disruptive. They read plays well and destroy actions. I don't see that with Rasheer. Most concerning with him though is his complete lack of playmaking. He can barely dribble, never passes and has a very bad AST/TO%. Very one dimensional on offence.

Bam and Draymond were both good ballhandlers for their size with a good feel for the game, and now serve as hubs for their respective offenses. I don't see any world where Rasheer does that.
Pericles
Pro Prospect
Posts: 883
And1: 116
Joined: Jun 22, 2002

Re: 2025 NBA Draft Discussion Part 7 

Post#1582 » by Pericles » Wed May 21, 2025 4:06 pm

I think we should look to move Dick at the draft.
We need to get a lockdown wing defender and a
big who can block shots in this draft. When you look
at the teams remaining in the playoffs-
Lu Dort, OG Anunoby, Alex Caruso, Cason Wallace,
Mikal Bridges, Pascal Siakam, Myles Turner, Chet Holmgren,
Mitch Robinson, Rudy Gobert, Jaden McDaniels, etc.
Certain themes become clear.

Jakobe Walter and Jamal Shead are a promising start to building a defensive perimeter.
Tripod
RealGM
Posts: 12,311
And1: 11,868
Joined: Aug 13, 2021
 

Re: 2025 NBA Draft Discussion Part 7 

Post#1583 » by Tripod » Wed May 21, 2025 4:16 pm

WuTang_OG wrote:

Not directing this just at you.

I wish some people would give a brief recap of these if they watch...save everyone a lot of time...lol
User avatar
dohboy_24
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,864
And1: 578
Joined: Apr 04, 2002
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: 2025 NBA Draft Discussion Part 7 

Post#1584 » by dohboy_24 » Wed May 21, 2025 4:16 pm

WuTang_OG wrote:
dohboy_24 wrote:
WuTang_OG wrote:klutch does the best hype machine vids lol


Not sure I would agree, especially since it's a DraftExpress video...


This is klutch event, they take all the vids
givony doesnt have camera ppl following him lol


I'm not convinced that's the case. Much easier to have your own camera guy then wait for each agency to send you the footage, especially when they're all filmed and edited the same way...

Chaz Lanier Pro Day

Read on Twitter


Koby Brea Pro Day

Read on Twitter


Alex Condon Pro Day

Read on Twitter


Ryan Kalkbrenner Pro Day

Read on Twitter


Neoklis Avdalas Pro Day

Read on Twitter


Yaxel Lendeborg Pro Day

Read on Twitter
Raptors record prediction: 45-37 (6th place in the East)
billy_hoyle
Starter
Posts: 2,446
And1: 1,572
Joined: Jun 16, 2008

Re: 2025 NBA Draft Discussion Part 7 

Post#1585 » by billy_hoyle » Wed May 21, 2025 4:18 pm

earthtone wrote:
billy_hoyle wrote:
CazOnReal wrote:Then i'm very glad you're not making decisions for this FO because that is egregious asset management.


It doesn't take a genius to determine you can get better value for Gradey than the 16th pick in any draft. Like, i'm not advocating for trading Dick right now, but aim higher than that if you're going to make a proposal for getting another pick in this draft.


By that same logic, you have no idea whether the Magic wouldn't prefer using the 16th pick instead of trading for Dick when they quite literally passed over him in the 2023 NBA Draft. Hell, maybe they do rate him but they value him as the 24th pick - or they could very well prefer someone like Anfernee Simons. After all, you you have no idea whether or not the other team would have any interest.

For the Magic specifically, Orlando is notorious for not making phone calls to other FOs to make trades, they just pick it up the phone when someone calls them: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/ad-injury-impact-bold-quotes-from-dallas-james-harden/id293376147?i=1000690796818

But I guess considering Orlando might not even want Gradey Dick is Super Smug Bros. 2: The Lost Smugness. :lol:



It's very funny for someone to make a judgement call about my reading comprehension when they clearly are either unable or unwilling to grasp the simple concept of "We do not need to make this decision right now for the 16th pick in the draft so the best course of action is to evaluate who does/not fit and then move them once you get to see what this team looks like with a presumably healthy roster".

It is not that complicated, it shouldn't have to be spelled out and yet, here we are.

Also Ochai is an RFA in 2026 if he isn't extended so calling them a "1 year rental" is just straight up misleading. No team is trading for Agbaji and then letting him walk when they'll be cheap to retain and offers a useful skillset in the modern NBA, regardless of what they evaluate his value to be.



In no world should Jamison Battle be a factor in your team's decision-making for the future of 3 players who are better than him. KJ Simpson is not going to be a factor for the Hornets in figuring out what they do with LaMelo Ball and if they were, then that's just another example of Charlotte's management engaging in malpractice.

Do you know what the word "factually" means? Because not only is that not "factually true", it's ignoring context such as where Dick is in the pecking order for opposing team's scouting report vs. Battle.


KJ Simpson should be a consideration when determining what to do with Nick Smith Jr. Comparing bench players to all stars is silly.

Battle shot the 3 at an elite rate. Dick has been average at best. If that trend continues, Battle should definitely eat into Dicks minutes.

Should FVV been prioritized over Delon Wright? Of course. Production matters, not draft pedigree.

Battle has the ability to knock down open shots, which is valuable and will get him a long career in the league if he keeps that up. Dick has the ability to generate open shots for others, which is a much more valuable skill. He can run around a stagger screen, draw multiple defenders out past the 3pt line, hit a pump fake and create a paint touch. He can attack off the catch and get to the rim. He can grab a defensive rebound and hit a pull-up three in transition. He can also, like Jamison, hit open shots others have created.

Dick's role is so much harder and he's been very good at it for his age. If he was only asked to stand and hit open corner threes like Battle is, I'm sure their percentages would look very similar. I like Jamison and hope he carves out a long term role on this team/in the league, but him and Gradey aren't the same caliber of prospect at all.


I don't think Dick has been that good at it tbh.

In the context of this team, Ingram and RJ are flat out better at all the things you listed, and will be better defensively.

Can Dick be a great movement shooter one day. Sure, that's possible. Is he more likely to be Kevin Huerter? I would say so.

Who is more valuable Kevin Huerter (mediocre /inconsistent movement shooter with bad D) or Aaron Nesmith (elite standstill shooter with passable D)?

If Dick becomes Rip Hamilton or JJ Reddick, well that's a different discussion.

He's also competing with RJ, Ochai & Ja'kobe, so he's up against 3 lottery talent SG prospects.

If he's the bench gunner/situational shooter, he's directly competing with Battle. I know who I'd draw up a play for between those two.
Pointgod
RealGM
Posts: 24,066
And1: 24,400
Joined: Jun 28, 2014

Re: 2025 NBA Draft Discussion Part 7 

Post#1586 » by Pointgod » Wed May 21, 2025 4:27 pm

dohboy_24 wrote:Every year there is at least one player who rises up the draft boards between now and the day of the draft.

Last year, it was Tidjane Saluan. In 2023, it was Bilal Coulibaly. In 2022, it was Shaedon Sharpe. In 2021, it was Scottie Barnes. In 2020, it was Jalen Smith and Isaiah Stewart.

This year, who do you think is going to be the biggest draft riser?


Coward
User avatar
Psubs
RealGM
Posts: 20,785
And1: 11,885
Joined: Nov 20, 2004
Location: Toronto

Re: 2025 NBA Draft Discussion Part 7 

Post#1587 » by Psubs » Wed May 21, 2025 4:29 pm

JCP11 wrote:
Psubs wrote:
JCP11 wrote:For me it's simple, if he develops a shot he's a top 3 player in this draft, the rest of his game is already well advanced for a sophomore. Not a lot of people here wants to wait or bet on him developing his shot to a respectable level because of Scottie and I get it but I would take him regardless and do everything I can to improve his shot. At his size when he gets downhill He's like a mini Zion. He's simply just a very good basketball player.


to Grant

Did you watch him shoot at the combine? He won't become a better shooter from 3 than Draymond. Draymond is a 32% 3pt shooter, which is better than MJ and Kobe! :lol: Though in today's NBA if he's shooting more than a wide open catch and shoot it's hurting the team.

Fleming isn't overrated. He's being mocked in the teens and even in the 20's. Those that like him know that he can be on Bam's level who was drafted 14th. A taller lankier Bam that can shoot 3's might be his ceiling but damn, that's insane. Maybe a shorter Serge Ibaka that can guard 3-5?

So one bad combine performance is enough to say he won't be better than Draymond? He improved from 0 to 26% from freshman to sophomore, it's still bad but that shows he worked on it and got some results. I don't think his motion is as broken as Draymond's was coming out. In a few years I can see him making open 3s at a 35% clip.


Look at how terribly he misses. I have more faith that Maluach will be closer to league average at 3's than CMB. CMB would be lucky to shoot like Mogbo. Mogbo shoots FT's slightly better.
Image
User avatar
Psubs
RealGM
Posts: 20,785
And1: 11,885
Joined: Nov 20, 2004
Location: Toronto

Re: 2025 NBA Draft Discussion Part 7 

Post#1588 » by Psubs » Wed May 21, 2025 4:36 pm

dohboy_24 wrote:
WuTang_OG wrote:
dohboy_24 wrote:
Not sure I would agree, especially since it's a DraftExpress video...


This is klutch event, they take all the vids
givony doesnt have camera ppl following him lol


I'm not convinced that's the case. Much easier to have your own camera guy then wait for each agency to send you the footage, especially when they're all filmed and edited the same way...

Chaz Lanier Pro Day

Read on Twitter


Koby Brea Pro Day

Read on Twitter


Alex Condon Pro Day

Read on Twitter


Ryan Kalkbrenner Pro Day

Read on Twitter


Neoklis Avdalas Pro Day

Read on Twitter


Yaxel Lendeborg Pro Day

Read on Twitter


Condon did not look good in the Final Four. Though it looks like he changed his 3pt shooting form and looks better.
Image
User avatar
WuTang_CMB
RealGM
Posts: 41,169
And1: 51,633
Joined: Sep 26, 2017
   

Re: 2025 NBA Draft Discussion Part 7 

Post#1589 » by WuTang_CMB » Wed May 21, 2025 4:41 pm

dohboy_24 wrote:
WuTang_OG wrote:
dohboy_24 wrote:
Not sure I would agree, especially since it's a DraftExpress video...


This is klutch event, they take all the vids
givony doesnt have camera ppl following him lol


I'm not convinced that's the case. Much easier to have your own camera guy then wait for each agency to send you the footage, especially when they're all filmed and edited the same way...

Chaz Lanier Pro Day

Read on Twitter


Koby Brea Pro Day

Read on Twitter


Alex Condon Pro Day

Read on Twitter


Ryan Kalkbrenner Pro Day

Read on Twitter


Neoklis Avdalas Pro Day

Read on Twitter


Yaxel Lendeborg Pro Day

Read on Twitter


Even if they were it dont matter. These are all hype videos. All these pro days have camera ppl likely from agency.
djsunyc
RealGM
Posts: 99,688
And1: 73,488
Joined: Dec 28, 2003

Re: 2025 NBA Draft Discussion Part 7 

Post#1590 » by djsunyc » Wed May 21, 2025 4:43 pm

my hope for this draft is that we take someone good enough that they can replace iq/rj/bi/scottie so we can move one of their high priced contracts for more pieces.
RoteSchroder
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,789
And1: 1,154
Joined: Jan 04, 2024

Re: 2025 NBA Draft Discussion Part 7 

Post#1591 » by RoteSchroder » Wed May 21, 2025 4:48 pm

There are 20+ players that I like, but my current targets are:

Essengue, Hansen Yang (another 1st), Bogoljub, Milos Uzan (another 2nd)

Get it done Masai, overpay if necessary
Yallbecrazy
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,790
And1: 5,461
Joined: Nov 25, 2013

Re: 2025 NBA Draft Discussion Part 7 

Post#1592 » by Yallbecrazy » Wed May 21, 2025 4:50 pm

Psubs wrote:
dohboy_24 wrote:
WuTang_OG wrote:
This is klutch event, they take all the vids
givony doesnt have camera ppl following him lol


I'm not convinced that's the case. Much easier to have your own camera guy then wait for each agency to send you the footage, especially when they're all filmed and edited the same way...

Chaz Lanier Pro Day

Read on Twitter


Koby Brea Pro Day

Read on Twitter


Alex Condon Pro Day

Read on Twitter


Ryan Kalkbrenner Pro Day

Read on Twitter


Neoklis Avdalas Pro Day

Read on Twitter


Yaxel Lendeborg Pro Day

Read on Twitter


Condon did not look good in the Final Four. Though it looks like he changed his 3pt shooting form and looks better.


He was hurt, but his really poor free throw shooting made me drop him out of my top 10. He's still new to the sport so there's hope, and I love his competitiveness and playmaking. He also is pretty quick laterally and times his shot blocking really well. I think he's gone in the 20s somewhere.
User avatar
WuTang_CMB
RealGM
Posts: 41,169
And1: 51,633
Joined: Sep 26, 2017
   

Re: 2025 NBA Draft Discussion Part 7 

Post#1593 » by WuTang_CMB » Wed May 21, 2025 4:52 pm

WuTang_OG wrote:I still also really like thomas sorber. solid measurements and a stock feen




Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=0YpMScWXY2zRUqR8fH-usg
JCP11
Junior
Posts: 420
And1: 278
Joined: Apr 29, 2025

Re: 2025 NBA Draft Discussion Part 7 

Post#1594 » by JCP11 » Wed May 21, 2025 4:59 pm

Yallbecrazy wrote:
JCP11 wrote:
dohboy_24 wrote:
These are the last ten (10) prospects drafted from South Carolina:

GG Jackson (2023 - #45 pick)
Sindarius Thornwell (2017 - #48 pick)
Renaldo Balkman (2006 - #20 pick)
Ryan Stack (1998 - #48 pick)
Jamie Watson (1994 - #47 pick)
Michael Foster (1987 - #144 pick)
Duan Kendall (1986 - #140 pick)
Mike Brittain (1985 - #29 pick)
Jim Foster (1984 - #102 pick)
Brad Jergenson (1984 - #182 pick)

Aside from his skills as a prospect and ability to improve his 3pt shooting rate, I'm not conceived the South Carolina Gamecocks can produce a lottery-level talent or even a solid rotational NBA player.

These guys have nothing to do with him and his career. I remember in college football Jeff Tedford had the reputation that all his QBs flamed in the NFL and then Aaron Rodgers came along. CMB is his own man and his future is not tied to these guys and he'll probably be the one who breaks that streak.


It's an absolutely ridiculous comment, and actually goes against what he is trying to prove. If a player goes to a crap program with crap coaching and players and is incredibly impactful shouldn't that be worth more than doing it at Duke?
He went to USC because he's from Columbus and his dad was a huge Gamecock fan. GG Jackson had a negative BPM while on USC. CMB had one of the highest in all of college basketball and nearly 3x his closest teammate.

Well said.
SpezNc
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,582
And1: 938
Joined: May 28, 2023
Contact:
   

Re: 2025 NBA Draft Discussion Part 7 

Post#1595 » by SpezNc » Wed May 21, 2025 5:04 pm

CazOnReal wrote:
mademan wrote:I'd trade Dick for the 16th pick in a second.

Then i'm very glad you're not making decisions for this FO because that is egregious asset management.
PhilBlackson wrote:The only case in point is your continued smug arrogance like you know it all



I am definitely in the camp “keep Gradey”. But in my opinion it’s because I still believe in his progression. Development is not linear but there is nothing that makes me think that he is not going to develop into prime shooter .

Raptors drafted him for a reason.

But I think we are a bit overestimating the asset management part. First pick #13 and #16 is basically the same value . I don’t care that 13 is part of lottery and 16 is not, the difference is minimal.

One argument to trade Gradey for #16 is also the fact that pick 16 2025 going to cost less than Gradey over the next 4 years.

That argument is insufficient for me to consider trading Gradey
User avatar
Clutch0z24
General Manager
Posts: 9,801
And1: 9,878
Joined: May 08, 2014
   

Re: 2025 NBA Draft Discussion Part 7 

Post#1596 » by Clutch0z24 » Wed May 21, 2025 5:07 pm

If CMB could shoot he would be better than the majority of the players being discussed here.....CMB is a better defender and a better all around player than majority of the players in the 9th area....Problem is he can't shoot atm.....If we draft him its because Masai thinks his shot will be good one day....Because if he can shoot i like him alot more than Rasheer/Noa/Bryant because hes a better defender/playmaker/offensive versitility than them all....Just that shot man....Idk how it would fit with this current team...
Image
JCP11
Junior
Posts: 420
And1: 278
Joined: Apr 29, 2025

Re: 2025 NBA Draft Discussion Part 7 

Post#1597 » by JCP11 » Wed May 21, 2025 5:12 pm

Psubs wrote:
JCP11 wrote:
Psubs wrote:
to Grant

Did you watch him shoot at the combine? He won't become a better shooter from 3 than Draymond. Draymond is a 32% 3pt shooter, which is better than MJ and Kobe! :lol: Though in today's NBA if he's shooting more than a wide open catch and shoot it's hurting the team.

Fleming isn't overrated. He's being mocked in the teens and even in the 20's. Those that like him know that he can be on Bam's level who was drafted 14th. A taller lankier Bam that can shoot 3's might be his ceiling but damn, that's insane. Maybe a shorter Serge Ibaka that can guard 3-5?

So one bad combine performance is enough to say he won't be better than Draymond? He improved from 0 to 26% from freshman to sophomore, it's still bad but that shows he worked on it and got some results. I don't think his motion is as broken as Draymond's was coming out. In a few years I can see him making open 3s at a 35% clip.


Look at how terribly he misses. I have more faith that Maluach will be closer to league average at 3's than CMB. CMB would be lucky to shoot like Mogbo. Mogbo shoots FT's slightly better.

Mogbo barely attempted a 3pt shot in college at least CMB made 9 3s last season, that must count for something no? Also, although it was a bad showing in one setting that has nothing to do with a game, I wouldn't put too much stock on his combine 3 pt shooting failure. Who knows maybe he's still tweaking his shot and still doesn't have it down yet. I'm not saying he'll be a knock down shooter but he's made some improvements from freshman year to sophomore, why couldn't that continue? Maluach's 3 pt shot looks better, yet CMB had a better pct. Anyways I agree with all your concerns, I'm just not ready to claim he won't improve to a respectable level.
grant101
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,468
And1: 1,077
Joined: Feb 04, 2022
 

Re: 2025 NBA Draft Discussion Part 7 

Post#1598 » by grant101 » Wed May 21, 2025 5:17 pm

SpezNc wrote:
CazOnReal wrote:
mademan wrote:I'd trade Dick for the 16th pick in a second.

Then i'm very glad you're not making decisions for this FO because that is egregious asset management.
PhilBlackson wrote:The only case in point is your continued smug arrogance like you know it all



I am definitely in the camp “keep Gradey”. But in my opinion it’s because I still believe in his progression. Development is not linear but there is nothing that makes me think that he is not going to develop into prime shooter .

Raptors drafted him for a reason.

But I think we are a bit overestimating the asset management part. First pick #13 and #16 is basically the same value . I don’t care that 13 is part of lottery and 16 is not, the difference is minimal.

One argument to trade Gradey for #16 is also the fact that pick 16 2025 going to cost less than Gradey over the next 4 years.

That argument is insufficient for me to consider trading Gradey


I think we'd regret trading Gradey now. He showed a hell of a lot those first few months. He has a lot more game than I thought when we drafted him, but it's going to take time to mature, and he still needs to put on strength. If those things happen, which I don't see why they wouldn't, watch out!

Point is, we'd be selling way too low if we moved him now. If he is to be moved this off-season I don't see it being for something as marginal as the 16th pick. Rather, it would be part of a larger package to bring in talent.
User avatar
Clutch0z24
General Manager
Posts: 9,801
And1: 9,878
Joined: May 08, 2014
   

Re: 2025 NBA Draft Discussion Part 7 

Post#1599 » by Clutch0z24 » Wed May 21, 2025 5:18 pm

Yallbecrazy wrote:
JCP11 wrote:
dohboy_24 wrote:
These are the last ten (10) prospects drafted from South Carolina:

GG Jackson (2023 - #45 pick)
Sindarius Thornwell (2017 - #48 pick)
Renaldo Balkman (2006 - #20 pick)
Ryan Stack (1998 - #48 pick)
Jamie Watson (1994 - #47 pick)
Michael Foster (1987 - #144 pick)
Duan Kendall (1986 - #140 pick)
Mike Brittain (1985 - #29 pick)
Jim Foster (1984 - #102 pick)
Brad Jergenson (1984 - #182 pick)

Aside from his skills as a prospect and ability to improve his 3pt shooting rate, I'm not conceived the South Carolina Gamecocks can produce a lottery-level talent or even a solid rotational NBA player.

These guys have nothing to do with him and his career. I remember in college football Jeff Tedford had the reputation that all his QBs flamed in the NFL and then Aaron Rodgers came along. CMB is his own man and his future is not tied to these guys and he'll probably be the one who breaks that streak.


It's an absolutely ridiculous comment, and actually goes against what he is trying to prove. If a player goes to a crap program with crap coaching and players and is incredibly impactful shouldn't that be worth more than doing it at Duke?
He went to USC because he's from Columbus and his dad was a huge Gamecock fan. GG Jackson had a negative BPM while on USC. CMB had one of the highest in all of college basketball and nearly 3x his closest teammate.


Im starting to come around on CMB Atm....Because looking at his package game overall hes better than the majority of the players in the 9th area at just about everything besides shooting....At 9 if someone really good doesn't fall to us i think CMB would be prolly the best pick available....But how much do you believe his shot getting better? Because his jumpshot is the key for him....Hes going to have to start to learn some wing skills imo due to his size as well...
Image
DG88
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 39,149
And1: 29,953
Joined: Jul 26, 2008
Location: You don't know my location but I know yours
     

Re: 2025 NBA Draft Discussion Part 7 

Post#1600 » by DG88 » Wed May 21, 2025 5:24 pm

Clutch0z24 wrote:If CMB could shoot he would be better than the majority of the players being discussed here.....CMB is a better defender and a better all around player than majority of the players in the 9th area....Problem is he can't shoot atm.....If we draft him its because Masai thinks his shot will be good one day....Because if he can shoot i like him alot more than Rasheer/Noa/Bryant because hes a better defender/playmaker/offensive versitility than them all....Just that shot man....Idk how it would fit with this current team...

I said in a previous draft thread that CMB could be a sleeper pick for us. He does everything you want and falls into that Masai type, but it's his shot that holds the rest of his game back.
Image

Return to Toronto Raptors