Paolo on The Pivot podcast
Moderators: Knightro, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior, UCF
Re: Paolo on The Pivot podcast
- SOUL
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,753
- And1: 40,810
- Joined: Dec 11, 2006
- Location: █████████████
-
Re: Paolo on The Pivot podcast
In the same interview, Paolo is praising Fultz as being the most helpful and someone he leaned on the most being here. I remember arguing against people saying that Fultz was making Paolo want to leave and doing damage to the team by keeping him on it lol.
www.rareslums.com // please support my writing!
Re: Paolo on The Pivot podcast
- tiderulz
- RealGM
- Posts: 36,924
- And1: 14,850
- Joined: Jun 16, 2010
- Location: Atlanta
-
Re: Paolo on The Pivot podcast
Knightro wrote:I already know this is going to come off far more harsh than I am actually feeling, but who cares...
The fact of the matter is Paolo Banchero, while still super young and obviously loaded with potential, has simply not accomplished enough to justify complaining his way out of town at this point in his professional basketball career.
He's not a top 10 NBA player. He's probably not even a top 20 NBA player at this point. He's never even won a playoff series. He simply does not have the stroke right now to pull any sort of nonsense like that.
He's gonna agree to his designated player maximum contract extension just like Franz did and that's gonna be the end of the discussion for a while.
And he's gonna play out *at least* the next 3 years of his contract. And then at that point if things are still crappy? Ok sure, then we can talk.
not because of his play. And that is the issue, in that he is now asking for help for the 2nd time. And he isnt asking for crazy, unobtainable things.
Re: Paolo on The Pivot podcast
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,530
- And1: 1,004
- Joined: Dec 19, 2022
-
Re: Paolo on The Pivot podcast
eyriq wrote:I come down directly in your corner on this. I think the concerns are actually absurd and irrational.Knightro wrote:I already know this is going to come off far more harsh than I am actually feeling, but who cares...
The fact of the matter is Paolo Banchero, while still super young and obviously loaded with potential, has simply not accomplished enough to justify complaining his way out of town at this point in his professional basketball career.
He's not a top 10 NBA player. He's probably not even a top 20 NBA player at this point. He's never even won a playoff series. He simply does not have the stroke right now to pull any sort of nonsense like that.
He's gonna agree to his designated player maximum contract extension just like Franz did and that's gonna be the end of the discussion for a while.
And he's gonna play out *at least* the next 3 years of his contract. And then at that point if things are still crappy? Ok sure, then we can talk.
To me, this is just a simple case of 2 things can be true at the same time. Paolo is constructively vocal and has a desire to win. That's not the norm. Squandering that is bad.
I get it, when his bag o cash arrives, that buys us time and well have fun seeing him develop. At the same time, he is vocal around the pieces needed to win.
Why is this so aligning with "People" lol.
Re: Paolo on The Pivot podcast
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,385
- And1: 8,428
- Joined: Jan 21, 2017
-
Re: Paolo on The Pivot podcast
JoshuaPotter wrote:eyriq wrote:I come down directly in your corner on this. I think the concerns are actually absurd and irrational.Knightro wrote:I already know this is going to come off far more harsh than I am actually feeling, but who cares...
The fact of the matter is Paolo Banchero, while still super young and obviously loaded with potential, has simply not accomplished enough to justify complaining his way out of town at this point in his professional basketball career.
He's not a top 10 NBA player. He's probably not even a top 20 NBA player at this point. He's never even won a playoff series. He simply does not have the stroke right now to pull any sort of nonsense like that.
He's gonna agree to his designated player maximum contract extension just like Franz did and that's gonna be the end of the discussion for a while.
And he's gonna play out *at least* the next 3 years of his contract. And then at that point if things are still crappy? Ok sure, then we can talk.
To me, this is just a simple case of 2 things can be true at the same time. Paolo is constructively vocal and has a desire to win. That's not the norm. Squandering that is bad.
I get it, when his bag o cash arrives, that buys us time and well have fun seeing him develop. At the same time, he is vocal around the pieces needed to win.
Why is this so aligning with "People" lol.
yep
He's already rich and under contract...getting richer will not make him a hostage or complacent about winning. The team needs to respect the superstar - it's not even an adversarial situation, necessarily. Hopefully, it's completely on the same page as Weltman (finally)...it's not any kind of threat or "demand" - just reasonable thinking.
Re: Paolo on The Pivot podcast
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,594
- And1: 3,264
- Joined: Mar 21, 2013
-
Re: Paolo on The Pivot podcast
Not really concerned about Paolo, the podcast personality. I wanna see Paolo, the basketball player.
Re: Paolo on The Pivot podcast
- eyriq
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 33,510
- And1: 9,475
- Joined: Mar 25, 2008
- Location: #TheLab
- Contact:
-
Re: Paolo on The Pivot podcast
JoshuaPotter wrote:eyriq wrote:I come down directly in your corner on this. I think the concerns are actually absurd and irrational.Knightro wrote:I already know this is going to come off far more harsh than I am actually feeling, but who cares...
The fact of the matter is Paolo Banchero, while still super young and obviously loaded with potential, has simply not accomplished enough to justify complaining his way out of town at this point in his professional basketball career.
He's not a top 10 NBA player. He's probably not even a top 20 NBA player at this point. He's never even won a playoff series. He simply does not have the stroke right now to pull any sort of nonsense like that.
He's gonna agree to his designated player maximum contract extension just like Franz did and that's gonna be the end of the discussion for a while.
And he's gonna play out *at least* the next 3 years of his contract. And then at that point if things are still crappy? Ok sure, then we can talk.
To me, this is just a simple case of 2 things can be true at the same time. Paolo is constructively vocal and has a desire to win. That's not the norm. Squandering that is bad.
I get it, when his bag o cash arrives, that buys us time and well have fun seeing him develop. At the same time, he is vocal around the pieces needed to win.
Why is this so aligning with "People" lol.
Totally agree, Paolo’s “say-it-out-loud” competitiveness is a huge asset, not a problem, and it’s on the front office to harness that urgency while he’s under a fresh max deal. His voice keeps the standards high.
Re: Paolo on The Pivot podcast
- BadMofoPimp
- RealGM
- Posts: 49,032
- And1: 12,502
- Joined: Oct 12, 2003
- Location: In the Paint
Re: Paolo on The Pivot podcast
JoshuaPotter wrote:eyriq wrote:I come down directly in your corner on this. I think the concerns are actually absurd and irrational.Knightro wrote:I already know this is going to come off far more harsh than I am actually feeling, but who cares...
The fact of the matter is Paolo Banchero, while still super young and obviously loaded with potential, has simply not accomplished enough to justify complaining his way out of town at this point in his professional basketball career.
He's not a top 10 NBA player. He's probably not even a top 20 NBA player at this point. He's never even won a playoff series. He simply does not have the stroke right now to pull any sort of nonsense like that.
He's gonna agree to his designated player maximum contract extension just like Franz did and that's gonna be the end of the discussion for a while.
And he's gonna play out *at least* the next 3 years of his contract. And then at that point if things are still crappy? Ok sure, then we can talk.
To me, this is just a simple case of 2 things can be true at the same time. Paolo is constructively vocal and has a desire to win. That's not the norm. Squandering that is bad.
I get it, when his bag o cash arrives, that buys us time and well have fun seeing him develop. At the same time, he is vocal around the pieces needed to win.
Why is this so aligning with "People" lol.
Funny that every star player on every team says the same things.

Provin Ya'll Wrong!!!
Re: Paolo on The Pivot podcast
- BadMofoPimp
- RealGM
- Posts: 49,032
- And1: 12,502
- Joined: Oct 12, 2003
- Location: In the Paint
Re: Paolo on The Pivot podcast
If Paolo truly wants to win, then he would accept less money to help the "Team" out.

Provin Ya'll Wrong!!!
Re: Paolo on The Pivot podcast
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,530
- And1: 1,004
- Joined: Dec 19, 2022
-
Re: Paolo on The Pivot podcast
BadMofoPimp wrote:If Paolo truly wants to win, then he would accept less money to help the "Team" out.
Did Michael Jordan?
Did Kobe Bryant?
Did Lebron James?
Did Steph Curry?
Did Dwayne Wade?
Did Shaq?
Sorry. If anything the tippy top players are UNDER PAID. Your argument works for people in the Suggs tier, and yes if it keeps up, possibly in the Franz tier. But so far, at least offensively, Paolo is in his own tier and slowly improving.
Re: Paolo on The Pivot podcast
- BadMofoPimp
- RealGM
- Posts: 49,032
- And1: 12,502
- Joined: Oct 12, 2003
- Location: In the Paint
Re: Paolo on The Pivot podcast
JoshuaPotter wrote:BadMofoPimp wrote:If Paolo truly wants to win, then he would accept less money to help the "Team" out.
Did Michael Jordan?
Did Kobe Bryant?
Did Lebron James?
Did Steph Curry?
Did Dwayne Wade?
Did Shaq?
Sorry. If anything the tippy top players are UNDER PAID. Your argument works for people in the Suggs tier, and yes if it keeps up, possibly in the Franz tier. But so far, at least offensively, Paolo is in his own tier and slowly improving.
I don't see Paolo being in their category. He tries to be by jacking up too many shots this past year as he was trying to earn that Max payday which in effect hurt the team at times.

Provin Ya'll Wrong!!!
Re: Paolo on The Pivot podcast
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 36,916
- And1: 14,810
- Joined: May 05, 2014
-
Re: Paolo on The Pivot podcast
Wade and Jordan did. The player's union freaks out if you take less than your market value.JoshuaPotter wrote:BadMofoPimp wrote:If Paolo truly wants to win, then he would accept less money to help the "Team" out.
Did Michael Jordan?
Did Kobe Bryant?
Did Lebron James?
Did Steph Curry?
Did Dwayne Wade?
Did Shaq?
Sorry. If anything the tippy top players are UNDER PAID. Your argument works for people in the Suggs tier, and yes if it keeps up, possibly in the Franz tier. But so far, at least offensively, Paolo is in his own tier and slowly improving.
Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app
Re: Paolo on The Pivot podcast
- KillMonger
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,625
- And1: 11,158
- Joined: Oct 13, 2012
-
Re: Paolo on The Pivot podcast
basketballRob wrote:Wade and Jordan did. The player's union freaks out if you take less than your market value.JoshuaPotter wrote:BadMofoPimp wrote:If Paolo truly wants to win, then he would accept less money to help the "Team" out.
Did Michael Jordan?
Did Kobe Bryant?
Did Lebron James?
Did Steph Curry?
Did Dwayne Wade?
Did Shaq?
Sorry. If anything the tippy top players are UNDER PAID. Your argument works for people in the Suggs tier, and yes if it keeps up, possibly in the Franz tier. But so far, at least offensively, Paolo is in his own tier and slowly improving.
Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app
they took less money eventually but NOT on their first big contract.....or second for that matter iirc

Re: Paolo on The Pivot podcast
- Knightro
- Forum Mod - Magic
- Posts: 28,204
- And1: 29,391
- Joined: Dec 18, 2010
- Location: Jersey
-
Re: Paolo on The Pivot podcast
Paolo shouldn’t and will not take one cent less than his absolute maximum contract.
Re: Paolo on The Pivot podcast
- tiderulz
- RealGM
- Posts: 36,924
- And1: 14,850
- Joined: Jun 16, 2010
- Location: Atlanta
-
Re: Paolo on The Pivot podcast
Knightro wrote:Paolo shouldn’t and will not take one cent less than his absolute maximum contract.
then he shouldnt cry about not having enough around him.
Peyton Manning always had to be the highest paid QB, and lost most post seasons and complained he needed more help.
Brady took less, the team used the money to put a better team on the field and he won more.
different sport I know, but similar idea.
Re: Paolo on The Pivot podcast
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,385
- And1: 8,428
- Joined: Jan 21, 2017
-
Re: Paolo on The Pivot podcast
Knightro wrote:Paolo shouldn’t and will not take one cent less than his absolute maximum contract.
It's just not even a reasonable topic to discuss...at least until he's looking at his NEXT deal.
Guys are seeing he's 2 years away from "entering" his prime and already suggesting this kind of stuff that only happens with superstars late in their careers, when they care about NOTHING more than rings...even then, they're usually bigger headlines than actual cuts.
The reasoning might make some sense for LBJ, at 40, with probably a billion in the bank (mostly from endorsements) and booming enterprises...to play with his sons and stack a LAL team. Even then, it's unlikely and unreasonable to ask for.
Re: Paolo on The Pivot podcast
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,385
- And1: 8,428
- Joined: Jan 21, 2017
-
Re: Paolo on The Pivot podcast
SOUL wrote:
In the same interview, Paolo is praising Fultz as being the most helpful and someone he leaned on the most being here. I remember arguing against people saying that Fultz was making Paolo want to leave and doing damage to the team by keeping him on it lol.
Another line on Fultz' resume...
*excellent at deferring
*will stifle massive offensive potential because that's what coach wants from his Lead Guard
*will start shooting the 3 NEXT year
*gracious host and locker room buddy

Re: Paolo on The Pivot podcast
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 36,916
- And1: 14,810
- Joined: May 05, 2014
-
Re: Paolo on The Pivot podcast
Jordan took less early and refused to take less towards the end of his career.KillMonger wrote:basketballRob wrote:Wade and Jordan did. The player's union freaks out if you take less than your market value.JoshuaPotter wrote:
Did Michael Jordan?
Did Kobe Bryant?
Did Lebron James?
Did Steph Curry?
Did Dwayne Wade?
Did Shaq?
Sorry. If anything the tippy top players are UNDER PAID. Your argument works for people in the Suggs tier, and yes if it keeps up, possibly in the Franz tier. But so far, at least offensively, Paolo is in his own tier and slowly improving.
Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app
they took less money eventually but NOT on their first big contract.....or second for that matter iirc
Sent from my SM-G998U1 using RealGM mobile app
Re: Paolo on The Pivot podcast
- KillMonger
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,625
- And1: 11,158
- Joined: Oct 13, 2012
-
Re: Paolo on The Pivot podcast
Not on his first big deal, no shotbasketballRob wrote:Jordan took less early and refused to take less towards the end of his career.KillMonger wrote:basketballRob wrote:Wade and Jordan did. The player's union freaks out if you take less than your market value.
Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app
they took less money eventually but NOT on their first big contract.....or second for that matter iirc
Sent from my SM-G998U1 using RealGM mobile app
Sent from my [Sidekick 5G] using RealGM mobile app

Re: Paolo on The Pivot podcast
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,181
- And1: 7,338
- Joined: Apr 02, 2017
Re: Paolo on The Pivot podcast
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,053
- And1: 5,744
- Joined: Aug 03, 2010
-
Re: Paolo on The Pivot podcast
BadMofoPimp wrote:JoshuaPotter wrote:BadMofoPimp wrote:If Paolo truly wants to win, then he would accept less money to help the "Team" out.
Did Michael Jordan?
Did Kobe Bryant?
Did Lebron James?
Did Steph Curry?
Did Dwayne Wade?
Did Shaq?
Sorry. If anything the tippy top players are UNDER PAID. Your argument works for people in the Suggs tier, and yes if it keeps up, possibly in the Franz tier. But so far, at least offensively, Paolo is in his own tier and slowly improving.
I don't see Paolo being in their category. He tries to be by jacking up too many shots this past year as he was trying to earn that Max payday which in effect hurt the team at times.
Paolo was going to get that max contract since before his rookie year ended. He could have been out for the season and we’d still offer him the max. With that said, I cannot see him giving us a discount to get better players. Franz didn’t, Suggs didn’t and I can’t see Paolo doing it.
For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life.-John 3:16
Go Magic, Go Dwight, Go Vuc, Go Paolo, Go Keegan
Go Magic, Go Dwight, Go Vuc, Go Paolo, Go Keegan
