Houston/Kings continue with Blazers/Lakers

Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

Astaluego
Starter
Posts: 2,394
And1: 907
Joined: May 02, 2020
   

Houston/Kings continue with Blazers/Lakers 

Post#1 » by Astaluego » Wed May 21, 2025 5:53 pm

Trade 1

KINGS
In:Green/J.Smith
Out:Lavine

HOUSTON
In: Lavine
Out:Green/JSmith

Houston needs to consolidate before its prospects get paid. Zach has flaws but can score at stellar volume and efficiency. Lavine surrounded by elite defenders + Udoka could work.


Trade 2
KINGS
In: Clingan/Maxi/Vandervilt /Vincent/#12
Out: Sabonis

a young core..
Ellis/Green/Murray/Smith/Clingan
Carter/Monk/12/LaRavia

They were not even good enough to qualify for the Playoffs, they are rejuvenating and raising their long-term ceiling with pieces that in my opinion fit better,


BLAZERS
In:Sabonis/Knecht
Out:Ayton/Clingan

Simons/Sharpe/Avdija/Cámara/Sabonis
Henderson/Knecht/Thybulle/Grant/R.Williams

This team is a contender in my opinion, young and with a lot of room for growth,

LAKERS
In:Ayton
Out: Vandervilt/Vincent/Maxi/Knecht

They get the center they need, while still retaining their most important assets, for the post-LeBron era.
Old Mike Lorenzo
Tim Lehrbach
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,088
And1: 4,346
Joined: Jul 29, 2001
   

Re: Houston/Kings continue with Blazers/Lakers 

Post#2 » by Tim Lehrbach » Wed May 21, 2025 6:03 pm

That Blazers team is not a contender, which is why Sabonis is not the right investment. It's obviously an upgrade, so it gives pause, but I think Portland likes what they have in Clingan.
Clipsz 4 Life
January 20, 2002-May 17, 2006
Saxon
February 20, 2001-August 9, 2007
User avatar
codydaze
Forum Mod - Kings
Forum Mod - Kings
Posts: 6,469
And1: 5,024
Joined: Jul 06, 2013
Location: Sacramento, CA
     

Re: Houston/Kings continue with Blazers/Lakers 

Post#3 » by codydaze » Wed May 21, 2025 6:03 pm

Yeah, I don't see Houston or Portland being very happy about these deals even though I do think Sabonis would be a great fit with the personnel they have in Portland.
Astaluego
Starter
Posts: 2,394
And1: 907
Joined: May 02, 2020
   

Re: Houston/Kings continue with Blazers/Lakers 

Post#4 » by Astaluego » Wed May 21, 2025 6:16 pm

codydaze wrote:Yeah, I don't see Houston or Portland being very happy about these deals even though I do think Sabonis would be a great fit with the personnel they have in Portland.

I think Lavine is a clear improvement over Green or at least he is much more prepared. In the worst case scenario, they would gain future flexibility, since it expires earlier and if it worked, Lavine's next contract would surely be more coherent.Is J.Smith too valuable? Could he be replaced by Brooks/Whitmore?
Old Mike Lorenzo
User avatar
LarsV8
RealGM
Posts: 10,130
And1: 5,434
Joined: Dec 13, 2009
       

Re: Houston/Kings continue with Blazers/Lakers 

Post#5 » by LarsV8 » Wed May 21, 2025 6:16 pm

Lavine is not a positive impact player.
Image
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,499
And1: 13,852
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Houston/Kings continue with Blazers/Lakers 

Post#6 » by JRoy » Wed May 21, 2025 6:19 pm

Cut POR out of this, thanks.

That team has no future.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
DiegoChara
Junior
Posts: 466
And1: 532
Joined: Jun 09, 2023
       

Re: Houston/Kings continue with Blazers/Lakers 

Post#7 » by DiegoChara » Wed May 21, 2025 6:49 pm

At that asset cost for Sabonis, I personally would do it for Portland.

I understand the hesitation that it makes them a treadmill team though.
MoreyWins
Senior
Posts: 724
And1: 673
Joined: Oct 17, 2018
 

Re: Houston/Kings continue with Blazers/Lakers 

Post#8 » by MoreyWins » Wed May 21, 2025 6:53 pm

Nope. The upgrade of Lavine over Green isn't worth Jabari. I don't think Lavine is worth trying to mold into a playoff caliber go-to scorer.
MoreyWins
Senior
Posts: 724
And1: 673
Joined: Oct 17, 2018
 

Re: Houston/Kings continue with Blazers/Lakers 

Post#9 » by MoreyWins » Wed May 21, 2025 6:55 pm

Astaluego wrote:
codydaze wrote:Is J.Smith too valuable? Could he be replaced by Brooks/Whitmore?

1. In this deal, yes.
2. Hell to the nah, to the nah, to the nah nah nahhh.
Astaluego
Starter
Posts: 2,394
And1: 907
Joined: May 02, 2020
   

Re: Houston/Kings continue with Blazers/Lakers 

Post#10 » by Astaluego » Wed May 21, 2025 6:58 pm

Because it limits them, they could still make future changes to improve. Sabonis is at his best and would fit perfectly alongside two top-level defensive wings. I think prospects develop much better surrounded by good players, and this trade leaves them with the option of one of Scott/Sharpe becoming their best version and becoming a very good team.
Old Mike Lorenzo
Xman
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,642
And1: 469
Joined: Jun 10, 2005

Re: Houston/Kings continue with Blazers/Lakers 

Post#11 » by Xman » Wed May 21, 2025 7:24 pm

$47 mil for aging LaVine?
Hopefully not Houston’s only option.
Green plus filler (team option guys).
No Jabari or prospects.
Pick ten is available but really don’t think it’s necessary.
LightTheBeam
RealGM
Posts: 18,872
And1: 12,009
Joined: Sep 17, 2010
     

Re: Houston/Kings continue with Blazers/Lakers 

Post#12 » by LightTheBeam » Wed May 21, 2025 7:35 pm

I love the fit in Portland I've been saying that should be the move for a few months now. I understand Portland fans are split on this, but It's a very low risk move. Sharpe, Scoot, Deni, Camara, Sabonis.

Can't see the Rockets trading for LaVine even if Green sucks. They should look at better options.
LightTheBeam
RealGM
Posts: 18,872
And1: 12,009
Joined: Sep 17, 2010
     

Re: Houston/Kings continue with Blazers/Lakers 

Post#13 » by LightTheBeam » Wed May 21, 2025 7:35 pm

Xman wrote:$47 mil for aging LaVine?
Hopefully not Houston’s only option.
Green plus filler (team option guys).
No Jabari or prospects.
Pick ten is available but really don’t think it’s necessary.


I'd be fine with LaVine for Green and whatever filler Houston wanted to offer. I want neither of these guys, but I assume the team could get away playing Green less than they will LaVine.
tester551
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,538
And1: 1,248
Joined: Jan 10, 2005
Location: Missing the Coast & Trees

Re: Houston/Kings continue with Blazers/Lakers 

Post#14 » by tester551 » Wed May 21, 2025 7:45 pm

Astaluego wrote:In:Ayton
Out: Vandervilt/Vincent/Maxi/Knecht

For Portland, I don't like the Sibonis/Clingan inclusion.

I might consider this portion of the trade where Ayton goes to Lakers for Vando/Vincent/Maxi/Knecht... IF Portland could find a team to give them value for Vando and Knecht.

Maybe a Blazer/Laker trade like this would be better:
Portland Out:Ayton
Lakers Out: Vanderbilt/Vincent/Finney-Smith

Although I guess it really depends on what type of value Knecht could bring back.
Apz
Head Coach
Posts: 6,751
And1: 2,492
Joined: Jan 18, 2019
 

Re: Houston/Kings continue with Blazers/Lakers 

Post#15 » by Apz » Wed May 21, 2025 8:10 pm

tester551 wrote:
Astaluego wrote:In:Ayton
Out: Vandervilt/Vincent/Maxi/Knecht

For Portland, I don't like the Sibonis/Clingan inclusion.

I might consider this portion of the trade where Ayton goes to Lakers for Vando/Vincent/Maxi/Knecht... IF Portland could find a team to give them value for Vando and Knecht.

Maybe a Blazer/Laker trade like this would be better:
Portland Out:Ayton
Lakers Out: Vanderbilt/Vincent/Finney-Smith

Although I guess it really depends on what type of value Knecht could bring back.


Why would lakers do that? Imo dfs is the best player in the deal

Return to Trades and Transactions