the_l_train wrote:His conditioning was vastly improved last year, and just by looking at him you could tell he lost a ton of weight. His conditioning clause in his contract will affect his money if he doesn't....so repeating the same "he's not motivated to fix it" talk track is just dated and wrong.
Conditioning and physical condition are not the same. He might be better conditioned, but the injury history is already extensive and it's here to stay.
He said multiple times publicly that he could play back to backs --- which would have bumped up his games played total a ton..., but the Pelicans were looking to protect the asset, knowing they are a **** franchise and that he's likely to be the next star to ask out of a bad situation. Their season and injury luck were awful from day 1, and holding him back to tank it out made more sense for their situation.
I don't buy that Zion would have played substantively more games in his career in that scenario, and if the Pelicans' medical staff judged that the availability of this endlessly injury-prone player was best served by not having him play back-to-backs, then that's that.
In any case, did they hold him out in the postseason as well? He's missed both of the Pelicans' appearances since he was drafted.
Sorry I used the term "hater", but everyone chiming in and hating on this insanely lopsided proposed deal is literally doing exactly what I predicted.
Instead of going in circles, let's agree to disagree on Zion, and we can all go back to talking about Jabari Smith and Lauri Markannen being our savior.
I think that nobody in NBA circles would deem this an "insanely lopsided" deal unless they're naming it that in favor of the Pelicans. Zion has very modest trade value because his long absences are inevitable and likelier to get more frequent rather than less.